Edited by Zathras, 26 July 2005 - 05:44 PM.
Gemmill hung like Chinese Mouse--Girlfriend
Started by
Zathras
, Jul 26 2005 01:42 PM
#1
Posted 26 July 2005 - 01:42 PM
Thought we'd need this thread on the new forum.
-- Though I think I got the title slightly wrong; anyone care to correct me?
#2
Posted 26 July 2005 - 04:44 PM
Aye, it was just plain old Chinese Mouse, you cheeky twat.
Gator's bitches better be using jimmies!
#3
Posted 26 July 2005 - 04:50 PM
#4
Posted 26 July 2005 - 04:53 PM
#5
Posted 26 July 2005 - 04:58 PM
#6
Posted 26 July 2005 - 07:08 PM
Here, I don't have to lend my considerable posting skills to this board you know!
Gator's bitches better be using jimmies!
#7
Posted 26 July 2005 - 07:09 PM
#8
Posted 26 July 2005 - 07:26 PM
peasepud, on Jul 26 2005, 01:09 PM, said:
He's right, you know. Did you read through all of the license agreements, Gemmill?
#9
Posted 26 July 2005 - 07:29 PM
#10
Posted 26 July 2005 - 07:43 PM
i wondered when this thread would be resurrected
#11
Posted 26 July 2005 - 07:44 PM
peasepud, on Jul 26 2005, 08:29 PM, said:
It's actually true. When I took my last job all I looked for in the contract was:
a) Salary
The rest was irrelevant.
Gator's bitches better be using jimmies!
#12
Posted 01 September 2005 - 05:23 PM
*cough*
#13
Guest_Sima_*
Posted 05 September 2005 - 02:51 PM
Guest_Sima_*
Gemmill, on Jul 26 2005, 08:44 PM, said:
peasepud, on Jul 26 2005, 08:29 PM, said:
It's actually true. When I took my last job all I looked for in the contract was:
a) Salary
The rest was irrelevant.
You say that like it is wrong.
#14
Posted 05 September 2005 - 05:47 PM
Sima, on Sep 5 2005, 03:51 PM, said:
Gemmill, on Jul 26 2005, 08:44 PM, said:
peasepud, on Jul 26 2005, 08:29 PM, said:
It's actually true. When I took my last job all I looked for in the contract was:
a) Salary
The rest was irrelevant.
You say that like it is wrong.
Not at all. What else is there to be bothered about?
Gator's bitches better be using jimmies!
#15
Guest_Sima_*
Posted 05 September 2005 - 07:57 PM
Guest_Sima_*
indeed....
#16
Posted 05 September 2005 - 08:19 PM
Gemmill, on Sep 5 2005, 06:47 PM, said:
Sima, on Sep 5 2005, 03:51 PM, said:
Gemmill, on Jul 26 2005, 08:44 PM, said:
peasepud, on Jul 26 2005, 08:29 PM, said:
It's actually true. When I took my last job all I looked for in the contract was:
a) Salary
The rest was irrelevant.
You say that like it is wrong.
Not at all. What else is there to be bothered about?
You never know, they might slip something in like "we reserve the right to bugger you senseless whenever we feel like it".
I wouldn't want to overlook that in a contract.
Again.
That was different. The towering inferno was a big building that caught fire. You can't apply the same criteria to a priest trapped on an explosive milkfloat.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account












