News of the WorldShocking
#41
Posted 05 July 2011 - 06:46 PM
#42
Posted 05 July 2011 - 07:05 PM
#43
Posted 05 July 2011 - 07:16 PM
peasepud, on Jul 5 2011, 08:05 PM, said:
....and then deleting them so you get a false impression they're still alive and leave some more.
Cunts want locking up. And the very least that should happen is that bint Brooks should get the boot. Fucking disgrace!

Change is inevitable, unless you're dealing with a vending machine.
#44
Posted 05 July 2011 - 07:26 PM
#45
Posted 05 July 2011 - 07:28 PM


#46
Posted 05 July 2011 - 07:28 PM
#47
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:05 PM
http://www.guardian....ord-advertising
#48
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:07 PM
ChezGiven, on Jul 5 2011, 08:28 PM, said:
http://www.guardian....nterview-quotes
I have a lot of time for Hari, for all his flaws, but he has acted like a bit of a divvy throughout this one.
#49
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:12 PM
If I was Murdoch, I'd close down the NotW, sack every journalist involved and launch a replacement Sunday tabloid with a whole new crew. The paper is too badly damaged.
*=It's OK as when domestic violence is a woman attacking a man, it is hilarious and only minor. It's only wrong if it is the other way round
#50
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:12 PM
ChezGiven, on Jul 5 2011, 09:05 PM, said:
http://www.guardian....ord-advertising
Quote
#51
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:40 PM
I would love it if we were witnessing the beginning of a slow death of this meaningless rag.
Maybe some day we will find out how many of the other 'papers' were happily going along with this fone hacking business. Until we do, the NOTW will have to be the sole focus of my detest.
Edited by snakehips, 05 July 2011 - 08:41 PM.
#52
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:45 PM
snakehips, on Jul 5 2011, 09:40 PM, said:
Aren't they dying a slow death anyway? I think circulation has been dwindling, or perhaps worse. Hopefully we will see due process and the prosecution of the criminals involved.
#53
Posted 05 July 2011 - 08:47 PM
Billy Castell, on Jul 5 2011, 09:12 PM, said:
If I was Murdoch, I'd close down the NotW, sack every journalist involved and launch a replacement Sunday tabloid with a whole new crew. The paper is too badly damaged.
*=It's OK as when domestic violence is a woman attacking a man, it is hilarious and only minor. It's only wrong if it is the other way round
Even more hilarious when you consider that her paper was running a campaign against domestic violence at the time.
#54
Posted 05 July 2011 - 10:10 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk...agazinemonitor/
http://www.newstates...cameron-murdoch
Here's a key excerpt used in the beeb piece:
Quote
Paul McMullan: "Yeah. Yeah. It's more than likely. Yeah...It was quite routine. Yeah - friends and family is something that's not as easy to justify as the other things."
#55
Posted 06 July 2011 - 02:07 AM
Quote
The revelation that bereaved family members may have had their mobile phone messages intercepted by Glenn Mulcaire, a private investigator employed by the paper, in the days following the 2005 London bombings will heap further pressure on the title's owner, News International, part of Rupert Murdoch's media empire.
#56
Posted 06 July 2011 - 06:39 AM
Craig, on Jul 5 2011, 08:16 PM, said:
peasepud, on Jul 5 2011, 08:05 PM, said:
....and then deleting them so you get a false impression they're still alive and leave some more.
Cunts want locking up. And the very least that should happen is that bint Brooks should get the boot. Fucking disgrace!
Don't they delete automatically after a period of time?
Not defending them or anything.
Edited by StevenL, 06 July 2011 - 06:39 AM.
#57
Posted 06 July 2011 - 08:18 AM
A functioning media are supposed to shine a light on the actions of the most powerful to inform and empower the electorate.
At the rags, I knew they ignored anything and everything of real importance to the country and the electorate in order to protect the elites, but to see the extent they'll go to to fuck over some of the most unfortunate people on the one hand while protecting those in power on the other is both staggering and depressingly unsurprising.
Let's let the BSkyB deal go through though, and hand over 90% of the media to the evil scum.
Edited by Happy Face, 06 July 2011 - 08:18 AM.
happyface@toontastic.net
#58
Guest_alex_*
Posted 06 July 2011 - 08:18 AM
Guest_alex_*
#59
Posted 06 July 2011 - 08:21 AM
alex, on Jul 6 2011, 09:18 AM, said:
Normally when there's revelation after revelation it's the gutter press I blame for drip-feeding to squeeze every last drop out of it.
Who exactly is drip-feeding these stories though? Every day there's more.
happyface@toontastic.net
#60
Posted 06 July 2011 - 08:24 AM
StevenL, on Jul 6 2011, 07:39 AM, said:
Craig, on Jul 5 2011, 08:16 PM, said:
peasepud, on Jul 5 2011, 08:05 PM, said:
....and then deleting them so you get a false impression they're still alive and leave some more.
Cunts want locking up. And the very least that should happen is that bint Brooks should get the boot. Fucking disgrace!
Don't they delete automatically after a period of time?
Not defending them or anything.
Depends on the provider.
Anyway by the sounds of it they weren't giving it chance to fall off naturally. Providers should be able to determine whether they were deleted and who by.
This needs a a public enquiry ASAP.

Change is inevitable, unless you're dealing with a vending machine.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account










