Jump to content

Welcome to Toontastic

Welcome to Toontastic, like most online communities you must register to post, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of Toontastic by signing in or creating an account.

  • Start new topics and reply to others as well as comment on articles.
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and connect with other fans
  • Participate in the Toontastic Prediction League
  • Upload Images to the Gallery
  • Use the Calendar feeds
  • You can even use your Twitter or Facebook accounts to make the signup even less painless!

Create Your Account Now By Visiting The Links Above or Clicking Here


Photo

Shearer or Beardsley?Who was the greatest?


  • Please log in to reply
103 replies to this topic

Poll: Who was the greatest?

Who was the greatest?

You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Vote Guests cannot vote

#1
Dr Gloom

Dr Gloom
  • Zany hoverboard king

  • 23,123 posts
Two of the great players of my lifetime. Who was the greatest?

Business as usual


#2
Rayvin

Rayvin
  • Club Captain

  • 8,908 posts
I'd say Shearer but only saw the tail end of Beardsley's career so not sure I can compare fully.

Edited by Rayvin, 16 March 2017 - 11:26 PM.

Idealistic Fuckwit.


#3
zico martin

zico martin
  • First Team Regular

  • 2,407 posts
Beardsley easily. We had him when he at his best, twice! We only got a drawn out swan song with Alan.
hey im @stevecharlton on twitter, chase me ;)

#4
Noelie

Noelie
  • First Team Regular

  • 2,398 posts

Seeing games at St. James' Park and odd ones elsewhere have been few and far between for me, most of my watching has been on screen. However, although I lean towards Shearer I have voted for Quasimodo as I thought he was more exciting to watch and had that aggression you see in a little man playing against the big lads.

Was introduced to him once in Los Angeles when England were playing Mexico at the LA Coliseum in a warm-up game before the World Cup being held in Mexico.



#5
TheGingerQuiff

TheGingerQuiff
  • First Team Regular

  • 2,908 posts
Shearer by some distance. It'd have been closer if Pedro wasn't a Fat Mike kissarse

#6
RobinRobin

RobinRobin
  • YTS Contract

  • 169 posts

Pedro - despite the kissarse.  Ball seemed stuck to his foot



#7
Andrew

Andrew
  • Commanding centre-back

  • 16,718 posts

Shearer for me, possibly age related.

Like Rayvin I only saw the tail of Pedros career while Shearer was my favourite player even before playing for us.



#8
Dr Gloom

Dr Gloom
  • Zany hoverboard king

  • 23,123 posts
it's neck and neck so far. pedro for me, but i was having this chat with a mate the other day and there's a rizla paper between them

Business as usual


#9
Howmanheyman

Howmanheyman
  • Corner Graduate.

  • 14,237 posts

Beardsley easily. We had him when he at his best, twice! We only got a drawn out swan song with Alan.

He was brilliant for us but he was no worse playing for Liverpool albeit in a far better side.

#10
Howmanheyman

Howmanheyman
  • Corner Graduate.

  • 14,237 posts
I sometimes think some take Shearer for granted, (guilty m'lud), he was on another planet goalscoring wise even with such a bad injury behind him which definitely took something away from him. I grew up on Beardsley though and he pips it for me.

#11
Tooj

Tooj
  • Adi Dassler

  • 24,950 posts
Don't see how you can really compare them in all honesty.

  • ▒▓██ N █ U █ F █ C ██▓▒


#12
Dr Gloom

Dr Gloom
  • Zany hoverboard king

  • 23,123 posts

well obviously they were different types of player, with different strengths, but it's a pretty simple question - who was the greater player for us? who had the bigger impact on the club? 


Business as usual


#13
Alex

Alex
  • Football Genius

  • 58,614 posts

I sometimes think some take Shearer for granted, (guilty m'lud), he was on another planet goalscoring wise even with such a bad injury behind him which definitely took something away from him. I grew up on Beardsley though and he pips it for me.

Think the fact that Shearer was 75% of the player he had been after the injury at Everton makes his achievements even greater. Although I would have to go with Pedro as a personal preference. As Tooj says it's difficult to compare different types of player.


Pardew is a good manager

 


#14
trooper

trooper
  • Number 9

  • 4,039 posts
Big Al for me there'll never be another player like him to play for NUFC . As we all know he could have signed for the red side of Manchester but came home instead. Not say Beardsley wasn't a good player but I'd pick Shearer.
"And the best day will come when someone buys it from him and runs it the way Newcastle should be run. The club can never go anywhere under Mike Ashley. I promise you that"- KEVIN KEEGAN


"Look son, this is the club who got taken to court by the legendary Kevin Keegan and proven guilty.

Look daughter, this is the man who disrespected the greatest goalscorer in our history.

#15
Dr Gloom

Dr Gloom
  • Zany hoverboard king

  • 23,123 posts

i suppose it's also down to what type of player gets you most wet - a clinical goal machine, or a wizard of dribble with magic in his boots.


Business as usual


#16
Park Life

Park Life
  • Legend

  • 33,654 posts

In modern money Shearer would be worth 80/90m and if you look at the likes of Silva then Pedro 40/50m.


Art destroys ideas.

#17
The Fish

The Fish
  • Pimms Drinking Sh!thouse

  • 45,548 posts

Beardsley's the better footballer, Shearer the greater player. Lead a team to a title, nearly did the same with us. Unbelievable scoring record in a team that was bang average more often than not. Did that after coming back from a career threatening injury that forced him to change his game.

 

Beardsley is incredibly gifted and had the right mentality to go with his wonderful skill, but Shearer wins it for me.



#18
David Kelly

David Kelly
  • Manager

  • 11,160 posts

Beardsley's the better footballer, Shearer the greater player. Lead a team to a title, nearly did the same with us. Unbelievable scoring record in a team that was bang average more often than not. Did that after coming back from a career threatening injury that forced him to change his game.

 

Beardsley is incredibly gifted and had the right mentality to go with his wonderful skill, but Shearer wins it for me.

I agree with the choice of Shearer but I disagree that Pedro is a better footballer.  He may have been more skillful, but Shearer was the better all round player.  I still maintain that Shearer could have played for England in any position that he put his mind to playing.

 

Of course David Kelly shits on them both for importance.


goonies, on 12 May 2016 - 2:39 PM, said:

Might live in a shit town but when I'm sat in the Stadium of light next season I'll think of you all, you poor poor people. These forums are fuelled by the oxygen of attention and you've all been so obliging. Thankyou!

#19
Howay

Howay
  • Club Captain

  • 9,392 posts

I'm similar to others in that I only really saw Beardsley at the end of his career, so I went with Shearer. Agree with Tooj that it's really difficult to compare them. Shearer was just so perfect for his position though, he had pace (until the injuries), power, two feet, great in the air, brilliant holding up the ball, etc. He also moved to us when I was young which always creates an attachment to quality players.

We also seemed to get an immense number of indirect free kicks inside the area when Shearer played for us, I can't remember seeing one since. Have they changed the rule or do they just not really get called anymore? Imagine having to be one of the players attempting to block a Shearer shot from one of them man :lol: .



#20
Dickie

Dickie
  • Reserve Team

  • 395 posts

I'd say I have fonder memories watching Pedro, partly cos I was a bit younger and partly because of his style of playing - all that invention and enthusiasm, some of the things he did genuinely took your breath away. I remember that goal he scored against Norwich at home from near the touchline (95?) - there really was a split second between the ball hitting the net and the start of the celebrations - in my memory it seems like it took 36,000 people a moment to think "did he really just score from THERE?" before realising that he did.

 

However, thinking objectively I think I'd say Shearer was the better footballer. You could say he was in the top 3 centre forwards in the world in his position when he signed for us (probably along with Batistuta and Ronaldo) and I'm not sure you could ever have said that Beardsley was quite in that class for support strikers. Also, what Shearer achieved while still being a shadow of his former self after the first and subsequent injuries is basically incredible. The stats speak for themselves, but as DK says he never gets the credit for his all round play - his hold-up play was better than anyone I've ever seen, thanks to a brilliant first touch (be it on his chest, thighs or feet) under pressure, he was a beast in the air and was one of the best crossers I've ever seen. Add to that lot, he was proper hard and I never, ever saw him shirk a challenge or take a backward step.  






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users