Right, who was it?
#81
Posted 04 April 2006 - 03:15 PM
#82
Posted 04 April 2006 - 03:29 PM
Gemmill, on Apr 4 2006, 04:15 PM, said:
You could rearrange those words into a rather unfortunate request.
Or fortunate, whichever
This is fantastic. I'm in heaven"
#83
Posted 04 April 2006 - 03:44 PM
geordieshandy, on Apr 4 2006, 04:29 PM, said:
Definitely fortunate in the case of the ginger bum lover.
Sounds like something Arthur Conan Doyle wrote.
Glenn Roeder on Glenn Roeder.
I came for the banter, I stayed for deadman's line attenuation
#84
Posted 04 April 2006 - 05:47 PM
#85
Posted 04 April 2006 - 05:56 PM
Taylor27, on Apr 4 2006, 09:45 AM, said:
1. How do you know he wasn't there, do you scrutinise everyone who gets inside SJP?
2. What the fuck are you gonna do about it if someone has made it up?

Change is inevitable, unless you're dealing with a vending machine.
#86
Posted 05 April 2006 - 02:11 PM
Craig, on Apr 4 2006, 05:56 PM, said:
Taylor27, on Apr 4 2006, 09:45 AM, said:
1. How do you know he wasn't there, do you scrutinise everyone who gets inside SJP?
2. What the fuck are you gonna do about it if someone has made it up?
1. Yes
2. I'm gonna make them look foolish.
#87
Posted 05 April 2006 - 02:13 PM
Taylor27, on Apr 5 2006, 03:11 PM, said:
Unless 3 involves pitying them, I really don't see the point of 2.
Glenn Roeder on Glenn Roeder.
I came for the banter, I stayed for deadman's line attenuation
#88
Guest_Sima_*
Posted 05 April 2006 - 04:48 PM
Guest_Sima_*
#89
Posted 06 April 2006 - 10:29 AM
#90
Guest_alex_*
Posted 06 April 2006 - 10:39 AM
Guest_alex_*
#91
Posted 06 April 2006 - 11:05 AM

#92
Guest_alex_*
Posted 06 April 2006 - 11:32 AM
Guest_alex_*
#93
Posted 06 April 2006 - 12:35 PM
Taylor27, on Apr 5 2006, 03:11 PM, said:
Craig, on Apr 4 2006, 05:56 PM, said:
Taylor27, on Apr 4 2006, 09:45 AM, said:
1. How do you know he wasn't there, do you scrutinise everyone who gets inside SJP?
2. What the fuck are you gonna do about it if someone has made it up?
1. Yes
2. I'm gonna make them look foolish.
What, you're gonna set up a hoax Look North website and ask them for an interview?
#94
Posted 06 April 2006 - 12:37 PM
DotBum, on Apr 5 2006, 03:13 PM, said:
#95
Posted 06 April 2006 - 06:09 PM
Taylor27, on Apr 5 2006, 02:11 PM, said:
Craig, on Apr 4 2006, 05:56 PM, said:
Taylor27, on Apr 4 2006, 09:45 AM, said:
1. How do you know he wasn't there, do you scrutinise everyone who gets inside SJP?
2. What the fuck are you gonna do about it if someone has made it up?
1. Yes
2. I'm gonna make them look foolish.
I think I may ask to accept the blame on this one, Id hate to miss what tomfoolery he has planned. Shittin mesel tbh
#96
Posted 06 April 2006 - 06:15 PM
peasepud, on Apr 6 2006, 06:09 PM, said:
Taylor27, on Apr 5 2006, 02:11 PM, said:
Craig, on Apr 4 2006, 05:56 PM, said:
Taylor27, on Apr 4 2006, 09:45 AM, said:
1. How do you know he wasn't there, do you scrutinise everyone who gets inside SJP?
2. What the fuck are you gonna do about it if someone has made it up?
1. Yes
2. I'm gonna make them look foolish.
I think I may ask to accept the blame on this one, Id hate to miss what tomfoolery he has planned. Shittin mesel tbh
You probably already have his number from 1471
#97
Posted 06 April 2006 - 06:23 PM
#98
Posted 14 August 2008 - 05:27 PM
- ▒▓██ N █ U █ F █ C ██▓▒
#99
Posted 14 August 2008 - 05:36 PM
#100
Posted 14 August 2008 - 05:39 PM
Gemmill, on Apr 4 2006, 09:09 AM, said:
Taylor27, on Apr 4 2006, 09:00 AM, said:
It has to either be someone wanting to derail the campaign, or an idiot who thinks that the best way to gget hitzfeld appointed is to create a false rumour.
Explain how this makes any difference to anything, you massive tool? The campaign couldn't be made to look any more stupid than it already has by conducting interviews with itself.
The thought still makes me giggle.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


Sign In
Create Account











