Guest Patrokles Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Personally I think Martins actually did quite well, given the circumstances. By circumstances, I mean, the rest of the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOPTOON 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Author Share Posted January 17, 2007 ROEDER -10000 FOR ORCHESTRATING THAT ABSOLUTE DOGSHITE PERFORMANCE!!! Dyer on the eye looked like one of our best players but he shoulden't play CM!!! Up top with Martins or on the RW!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 (edited) ROEDER -10000 FOR ORCHESTRATING THAT ABSOLUTE DOGSHITE PERFORMANCE!!! Dyer on the eye looked like one of our best players but he shoulden't play CM!!! Up top with Martins or on the RW!! And play who in central midfield, exactly? When we've had the players fit, Dyer has played exactly those positions you support. Edited January 17, 2007 by Patrokles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zico martin 84 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Given: 6 Solano: 2 - One of the worst right-back performances I've ever seen. He barely completed a pass all night. Shit. Taylor: 3 - Pathetic. Miles out of position, playing their forwards onside, stupid sending off Ramage: 3 - Dogshit. Huntington: 3 - Fucking rubbish. Milner: 6.5 - Best Newcastle player by a mile, cracking goal, never gave up Dyer: 5 - Rarely on the ball, ran out of steam, couldn't get a grip on the game at all. Tried lots of things that didn't quite come off. Butt: 5 - Very poor by his recent standard of play. Pattison: 3 - Barely a footballer. Slow and shit. Martins: 5.5 - Got close to magic but never quite got there. Support was poor from team-mates Sibs: 5 - for getting kicked in the head twice good goal for milner yeah but did he make a single good cross all game? Him and Butt were frustrating as hell again tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 (edited) Milner was one of the few players who actually managed to retain posession and find a b&w shirt. His crossing was poor, but it often is. He scored a blinder, worked hard, won tackles (unlike his defensive team-mates) and shouldn't get tarnished with the same shitty brush as his woeful colleagues. Edited January 17, 2007 by Keefaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 9 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Given - 5 Solano - 3 Huntington - 3 Taylor - 3 Ramage - 2 Milner - 4 Pattison - 3 (O'Brien - 3) Dyer - 5 Butt - 4 Sibierski - 4 Martins - 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 9 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 And over a run of 10-15 games, no way in the f*ck are Solano & Huntington better full-backs than Carr & Babayaro. 16 goals conceded in our last 6 games. What a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOPTOON 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Author Share Posted January 17, 2007 ROEDER -10000 FOR ORCHESTRATING THAT ABSOLUTE DOGSHITE PERFORMANCE!!! Dyer on the eye looked like one of our best players but he shoulden't play CM!!! Up top with Martins or on the RW!! And play who in central midfield, exactly? When we've had the players fit, Dyer has played exactly those positions you support. Le Slug! someone else !! even the Fat ginger Mong if desperate enough !!!!!! Just play dyer where he'd be more effective!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@yourservice 67 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Personally I think Martins actually did quite well, given the circumstances. By circumstances, I mean, the rest of the team. I agree,he was hungry tonight,tables have surely turned on who is the best of a bad bunch! Maybe the service of a man utd/arsenal would go to show how good a player Martins really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 4811 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 And over a run of 10-15 games, no way in the f*ck are Solano & Huntington better full-backs than Carr & Babayaro. 16 goals conceded in our last 6 games. What a joke. Neither are natural full backs though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 9 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 But for some reason people would still sooner them ahead of those two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 (edited) Let's make no bones about it: Carr and Babayaro are shit. Tonight hasn't erased my memory of some of the crap they've turned in themselves. Edited January 17, 2007 by Keefaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 9 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 I can never remember them playing as poorly as that. Solano & Huntington have done a job, but the fact we've been scoring goals has hidden the fact we've been leaking them for fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stevieintoon Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 I hate slagging toon players, but I've said it for a long time, Ramage will never be a footballer as long as he's got a hole in his arse. Every time he gets the ball I know the opposition are going to get it, it's as simple as that, if you can't pass you can't play football, I know fine well there are people on this forum who are technically more gifted than him. It's not just his passing it's his decision making as well, the first goal, what the fuck was he doing, if you're under any pressure at all in the box if you're technically shite, put the fuckin baal in the crowd, don't try measured fucking 10 yard passes when you know fine well you're a poor mans Darren Peacock. People that were sticking up for him when he was shite at left back "he's a great centre half, he's out of position at left back.", have a word with yourselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 I hate slagging toon players, but I've said it for a long time, Ramage will never be a footballer as long as he's got a hole in his arse. Every time he gets the ball I know the opposition are going to get it, it's as simple as that, if you can't pass you can't play football, I know fine well there are people on this forum who are technically more gifted than him. It's not just his passing it's his decision making as well, the first goal, what the fuck was he doing, if you're under any pressure at all in the box if you're technically shite, put the fuckin baal in the crowd, don't try measured fucking 10 yard passes when you know fine well you're a poor mans Darren Peacock. People that were sticking up for him when he was shite at left back "he's a great centre half, he's out of position at left back.", have a word with yourselves. Tbf, he is actually even worse at left-back than he is at centre-half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInspiration 1 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Need Bramble tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stevieintoon Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 I hate slagging toon players, but I've said it for a long time, Ramage will never be a footballer as long as he's got a hole in his arse. Every time he gets the ball I know the opposition are going to get it, it's as simple as that, if you can't pass you can't play football, I know fine well there are people on this forum who are technically more gifted than him. It's not just his passing it's his decision making as well, the first goal, what the fuck was he doing, if you're under any pressure at all in the box if you're technically shite, put the fuckin baal in the crowd, don't try measured fucking 10 yard passes when you know fine well you're a poor mans Darren Peacock. People that were sticking up for him when he was shite at left back "he's a great centre half, he's out of position at left back.", have a word with yourselves. Tbf, he is actually even worse at left-back than he is at centre-half. I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pegasus Bridge 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 You can't really have a go at Huntington. Young lad, has got talent (i know for a fact), playing out of position (both full back positions), and has been thrown in at the deep end. Young players need to be worked into the squad, slowly. Due to the injury fiasco, he's been chucked reet in, and for the most part, he's been average out of position. No worse than Taylor tonight, apart from he didnt get sent off. Can't write off our players yet man. Ramage on the other hand, is a lost cause. 23 years of age, plenty of PL experience, and he's just fucking comical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 It's ridiculous, really, when you consider we're a wealthy club in the Premiership. The likes of Ramage, Huntington, Edgar will probably be lucky if they're playing League 2 football a couple of seasons down the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 9 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 To me Huntington just looks a pretty boy. Always gets outmuscled, doesn't put his body on the line, distribution is sh*t. Even at 19, he should have those 3 basic things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stevieintoon Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 You can't really have a go at Huntington. Young lad, has got talent (i know for a fact), playing out of position (both full back positions), and has been thrown in at the deep end. Young players need to be worked into the squad, slowly. Due to the injury fiasco, he's been chucked reet in, and for the most part, he's been average out of position. No worse than Taylor tonight, apart from he didnt get sent off. Can't write off our players yet man. Ramage on the other hand, is a lost cause. 23 years of age, plenty of PL experience, and he's just fucking comical. Those cunts in the East Stand deserve doing in. It's always them old bastards in their fuckin Pringle jumpers and fuckin Barbour jackets, with their fuckin cars parked in fuckin £10 a time car parks that are the biggest cunts. They got right stuck in to Huntingdon, he took a while to find an angle to give it wide to Pattison, and what do them bastards do? Cheer sarcastically. Fuckin moaning old wanks. It's always them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pegasus Bridge 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 To me Huntington just looks a pretty boy. Always gets outmuscled, doesn't put his body on the line, distribution is sh*t. Even at 19, he should have those 3 basic things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 I hate slagging toon players, but I've said it for a long time, Ramage will never be a footballer as long as he's got a hole in his arse. Every time he gets the ball I know the opposition are going to get it, it's as simple as that, if you can't pass you can't play football, I know fine well there are people on this forum who are technically more gifted than him. It's not just his passing it's his decision making as well, the first goal, what the fuck was he doing, if you're under any pressure at all in the box if you're technically shite, put the fuckin baal in the crowd, don't try measured fucking 10 yard passes when you know fine well you're a poor mans Darren Peacock. People that were sticking up for him when he was shite at left back "he's a great centre half, he's out of position at left back.", have a word with yourselves. Ditto Pattison. At least Ramage got away with it for a few games, cos when you're defending, you don't need much technical ability a lot of the time, but Pattison, Christ. I fail to see what he offers as a midfielder that is more than, for example, me. He can't even do the basics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missed Sticks 0 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 Steve Caldwell > Peter Ramage tbh. My mate renamed him 'Drainage' at HT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted January 17, 2007 Share Posted January 17, 2007 And over a run of 10-15 games, no way in the f*ck are Solano & Huntington better full-backs than Carr & Babayaro. 16 goals conceded in our last 6 games. What a joke. I still don't think I'd take Carr over Solano, we need a LB though without a doubt (and a good CB and a good striker with a bit of presence in the air and bit of genuine attacking quality in midfield). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now