Jump to content

Smokers suck


Kevin Carr's Gloves
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 561
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't even know what I'm protesting against tbh

 

Funny smells, I think.

 

discrimination in the workplace actually

 

Hehe yes, now that every other "argument" has been shot down in flames you seem to have settled on that (except for miners for which "discrimination" is clearly fine you believe ;)).

 

Via the revolution, the workers should not be stinky!!! ;)

 

any progress on researching 'smoking clubs' yet? perfectly legal, despite the nasty government and their wicked sneaky ways

 

Again, nope. Not unless it's simply a group of people in someones house, there could have been an exemption but they rejected it IIRC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even know what I'm protesting against tbh

 

Funny smells, I think.

 

discrimination in the workplace actually

 

Hehe yes, now that every other "argument" has been shot down in flames you seem to have settled on that (except for miners for which "discrimination" is clearly fine you believe ;)).

 

Via the revolution, the workers should not be stinky!!! ;)

 

any progress on researching 'smoking clubs' yet? perfectly legal, despite the nasty government and their wicked sneaky ways

 

Again, nope. Not unless it's simply a group of people in someones house, there could have been an exemption but they rejected it IIRC.

 

what other definition have you got for a smokers club then? I think you'll find a private party for smokers is perfectly legal. Anything that precludes say hiring a hall for a 'smoking club', will be down to pre-existing bans by the establishment in question, and not the nasty government

 

and I haven't 'settled' on discrimination, it's been the whole point since the start, go back and re-read

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even know what I'm protesting against tbh

 

Funny smells, I think.

 

discrimination in the workplace actually

 

Hehe yes, now that every other "argument" has been shot down in flames you seem to have settled on that (except for miners for which "discrimination" is clearly fine you believe ;)).

 

Via the revolution, the workers should not be stinky!!! :icon_lol:

 

any progress on researching 'smoking clubs' yet? perfectly legal, despite the nasty government and their wicked sneaky ways

 

Again, nope. Not unless it's simply a group of people in someones house, there could have been an exemption but they rejected it IIRC.

 

what other definition have you got for a smokers club then?

 

You must have lead a sheltered life if you don't know what I'm talking about.

 

 

I think you'll find a private party for smokers is perfectly legal.

 

A personal private party in ones own home, yes. But that isn't what I'm talking about.

 

Anything that precludes say hiring a hall for a 'smoking club', will be down to pre-existing bans by the establishment in question, and not the nasty government

 

Nope even in premises owned by said club.

 

and I haven't 'settled' on discrimination, it's been the whole point since the start, go back and re-read

 

Yes that'd be why your comment after my first comment would be:

 

and how much is that compared to the budget for the care of lung cancer/emphesema/bronchitis/mouth cancer/heart disease/tumor patients ?

 

Dissemble all you like, we both know your crusade ain't about workplace discrimination. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even know what I'm protesting against tbh

 

Funny smells, I think.

 

discrimination in the workplace actually

 

Hehe yes, now that every other "argument" has been shot down in flames you seem to have settled on that (except for miners for which "discrimination" is clearly fine you believe ;)).

 

Via the revolution, the workers should not be stinky!!! :icon_lol:

 

any progress on researching 'smoking clubs' yet? perfectly legal, despite the nasty government and their wicked sneaky ways

 

Again, nope. Not unless it's simply a group of people in someones house, there could have been an exemption but they rejected it IIRC.

 

what other definition have you got for a smokers club then?

 

You must have lead a sheltered life if you don't know what I'm talking about.

 

 

I think you'll find a private party for smokers is perfectly legal.

 

A personal private party in ones own home, yes. But that isn't what I'm talking about.

 

Anything that precludes say hiring a hall for a 'smoking club', will be down to pre-existing bans by the establishment in question, and not the nasty government

 

Nope even in premises owned by said club.

 

and I haven't 'settled' on discrimination, it's been the whole point since the start, go back and re-read

 

Yes that'd be why your comment after my first comment would be:

 

and how much is that compared to the budget for the care of lung cancer/emphesema/bronchitis/mouth cancer/heart disease/tumor patients ?

 

Dissemble all you like, we both know your crusade ain't about workplace discrimination. ;)

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even know what I'm protesting against tbh

 

Funny smells, I think.

 

discrimination in the workplace actually

 

Hehe yes, now that every other "argument" has been shot down in flames you seem to have settled on that (except for miners for which "discrimination" is clearly fine you believe ;)).

 

Via the revolution, the workers should not be stinky!!! :icon_lol:

 

any progress on researching 'smoking clubs' yet? perfectly legal, despite the nasty government and their wicked sneaky ways

 

Again, nope. Not unless it's simply a group of people in someones house, there could have been an exemption but they rejected it IIRC.

 

what other definition have you got for a smokers club then?

 

You must have lead a sheltered life if you don't know what I'm talking about.

 

 

I think you'll find a private party for smokers is perfectly legal.

 

A personal private party in ones own home, yes. But that isn't what I'm talking about.

 

Anything that precludes say hiring a hall for a 'smoking club', will be down to pre-existing bans by the establishment in question, and not the nasty government

 

Nope even in premises owned by said club.

 

and I haven't 'settled' on discrimination, it's been the whole point since the start, go back and re-read

 

Yes that'd be why your comment after my first comment would be:

 

and how much is that compared to the budget for the care of lung cancer/emphesema/bronchitis/mouth cancer/heart disease/tumor patients ?

 

Dissemble all you like, we both know your crusade ain't about workplace discrimination. ;)

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

A classic Vicduka quote style post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps).

 

 

find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps).

 

 

find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then

 

Alex%20Wilson%20-%20Bum_by_AlexWilson.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps).

 

 

find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then

 

Find me the relevant passage that exempts them first and I will.... oh wait. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps).

 

 

find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then

 

Find me the relevant passage that exempts them first and I will.... oh wait. ;)

 

no exemption required it's the whole point of the bill

 

but that would make it a bill protecting workers and not an anti smoking human rights issue wouldn't it, so that can't be right surely.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps).

 

 

find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then

 

Find me the relevant passage that exempts them first and I will.... oh wait. ;)

 

no exemption required it's the whole point of the bill

 

 

No exemption exists, although it would have done under the original proposed ban.

 

but that would make it a bill protecting workers and not an anti smoking human rights issue wouldn't it, so that can't be right surely.....

 

Out of interest why was it only food serving pubs then in the first place? (before the scare and lies got into it) and not non-food pubs and private members club? Or do they just not count like miners and motorcyclists (and the senile and blind?) ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest alex

Vic and Fop (assuming it is Vic). Two posters utterly relentless in their single-minded assaults on these sort of arguments. Mint ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vic and Fop (assuming it is Vic). Two posters utterly relentless in their single-minded assaults on these sort of arguments. Mint ;)

 

I'm just wondering when he'll give up tbh. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest alex

Vic and Fop (assuming it is Vic). Two posters utterly relentless in their single-minded assaults on these sort of arguments. Mint ;)

 

I'm just wondering when he'll give up tbh. ;)

I wasn't having a pop like. I'm genuinely amused :icon_lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps).

 

 

find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then

 

Find me the relevant passage that exempts them first and I will.... oh wait. ;)

 

no exemption required it's the whole point of the bill

 

 

No exemption exists, although it would have done under the original proposed ban.

 

but that would make it a bill protecting workers and not an anti smoking human rights issue wouldn't it, so that can't be right surely.....

 

Out of interest why was it only food serving pubs then in the first place? (before the scare and lies got into it) and not non-food pubs and private members club? Or do they just not count like miners and motorcyclists (and the senile and blind?) ;)

 

once again you lose me with your irrelevant throwbacks to long gone references. seriously, what have the miners got to do with this point? I'm expecting you to just say, it's your point and a stupid smiley, but you've seriously lost me tbh

 

 

the excemption was for working mens clubs, which have STAFF, so again, what's your point? how is the fact that wmc's were eventually included make this a bill not about workers?

 

go and gather a group of smokers together and call yourselves a club. perfectly legal

 

have an employee present, illegal

 

but you still insist this bill is not about worker protection?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vic and Fop (assuming it is Vic). Two posters utterly relentless in their single-minded assaults on these sort of arguments. Mint ;)

 

I'm just wondering when he'll give up tbh. :icon_lol:

I wasn't having a pop like. I'm genuinely amused :icon_lol:

 

This is what shaping bandwith is all about. ;)

 

 

I beleive Fop is cleaning house mind.

 

I'm worried though that sooner or later Vic's criminal insanity and plain grudge match elbow techniques might wiegh down the elequent Fopster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps).

 

 

find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then

 

Find me the relevant passage that exempts them first and I will.... oh wait. ;)

 

no exemption required it's the whole point of the bill

 

 

No exemption exists, although it would have done under the original proposed ban.

 

but that would make it a bill protecting workers and not an anti smoking human rights issue wouldn't it, so that can't be right surely.....

 

Out of interest why was it only food serving pubs then in the first place? (before the scare and lies got into it) and not non-food pubs and private members club? Or do they just not count like miners and motorcyclists (and the senile and blind?) ;)

 

once again you lose me with your irrelevant throwbacks to long gone references. seriously, what have the miners got to do with this point? I'm expecting you to just say, it's your point and a stupid smiley, but you've seriously lost me tbh

 

I'm beginning to think you have something again miners tbh.

 

 

the excemption was for working mens clubs, which have STAFF, so again, what's your point? how is the fact that wmc's were eventually included make this a bill not about workers?

 

More by accident (and propaganda) than design.

 

 

go and gather a group of smokers together and call yourselves a club. perfectly legal

 

Not what I'm talking about.

 

have an employee present, illegal

 

Still not quite.

 

but you still insist this bill is not about worker protection?

 

Actually what I insist is that second hand smoke is a non-issue, but you agreed with me on that ages ago. :icon_lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

christ you don't even know the law that you are arguing about

 

I suggest you go read it, a private smoking club is perfectly legal

 

Again I do, you just don't seem to know what I am talking about (no great surprise though perhaps).

 

 

find me the relevant passage that bans private smoking clubs then

 

Find me the relevant passage that exempts them first and I will.... oh wait. ;)

 

no exemption required it's the whole point of the bill

 

 

No exemption exists, although it would have done under the original proposed ban.

 

but that would make it a bill protecting workers and not an anti smoking human rights issue wouldn't it, so that can't be right surely.....

 

Out of interest why was it only food serving pubs then in the first place? (before the scare and lies got into it) and not non-food pubs and private members club? Or do they just not count like miners and motorcyclists (and the senile and blind?) ;)

 

once again you lose me with your irrelevant throwbacks to long gone references. seriously, what have the miners got to do with this point? I'm expecting you to just say, it's your point and a stupid smiley, but you've seriously lost me tbh

 

I'm beginning to think you have something again miners tbh.

 

 

the excemption was for working mens clubs, which have STAFF, so again, what's your point? how is the fact that wmc's were eventually included make this a bill not about workers?

 

More by accident (and propaganda) than design.

 

 

go and gather a group of smokers together and call yourselves a club. perfectly legal

 

Not what I'm talking about.

 

have an employee present, illegal

 

Still not quite.

 

but you still insist this bill is not about worker protection?

 

Actually what I insist is that second hand smoke is a non-issue, but you agreed with me on that ages ago. :icon_lol:

 

where did I do that then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.