Jump to content

New Numbers


geordieshandy
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 - Shay GIVEN

2 - Stephen CARR

3 -

4 - David ROZEHNAL

5 - EMRE

6 -

7 - Joey BARTON

8 - Kieron DYER

9 - Obafemi MARTINS

10 - Michael OWEN

11 - Damien DUFF

12

13 - Steve HARPER

14 - Charles N'ZOGBIA

15 - Nolberto SOLANO

16 - James MILNER

17 -

18 -

19 - Albert LUQUE

20 - GEREMI

21 -

22 - Nicky BUTT

23 - Shola AMEOBI

24 -

25 -

26 - Peter RAMAGE

27 - Steven TAYLOR

28 -

29 -

30 - David EDGAR

31 -

32 - Paul HUNTINGTON

33 - Celestine BABAYARO

34 - Fraser FORSTER

35 - Matthew PATTISON

36 - Mark VIDUKA

37 - James TROISI

38 -

39 - Andy CARROLL

40 - Tim KRUL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Nobby was to relinquish the (holy) number 4, would have hoped Taylor would get it :crying:

 

... some odd re-arangements, like Harper changing his mind again on which one he prefers, 12 or 13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is Viduka 36???

 

 

His weight in stones.

Watch it Ken will get upset at you!

Give you a hint.

3+6=?

 

Oh, is this like the raided thread?

 

Cystic Fibrosis?

Edited by Barney
Link to comment
Share on other sites

weird that nobby has lost his number 4 shirt. i would have thought butt would have fancied that one but why was it up for grabs in the first place i wonder?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is Viduka 36???

 

 

His weight in stones.

Watch it Ken will get upset at you!

Give you a hint.

3+6=?

 

Oh, is this like the raided thread?

 

Cystic Fibrosis?

No, no, no Barney the answer is a prince albert piercing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is Viduka 36???

 

 

His weight in stones.

Watch it Ken will get upset at you!

Give you a hint.

3+6=?

 

Why not 18 then?

 

Why not 54 then? :crying:

 

Because 54 is a rubbish number. So is 36. People normally want numbers in the 1-11 because it makes them seem like first teamers. (18 is closer to 11 (and 9) than 36 or 54!)

 

I remember when Zamorano hat 1+8 on his shirt after someone (Ronaldo?) stole his #9 shirt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is Viduka 36???

 

 

His weight in stones.

Watch it Ken will get upset at you!

Give you a hint.

3+6=?

 

Why not 18 then?

 

It's been retired in honour of Zico Hughes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is Viduka 36???

 

 

His weight in stones.

Watch it Ken will get upset at you!

Give you a hint.

3+6=?

 

Why not 18 then?

 

Why not 54 then? :crying:

 

Because 54 is a rubbish number. So is 36. People normally want numbers in the 1-11 because it makes them seem like first teamers. (18 is closer to 11 (and 9) than 36 or 54!)

 

I remember when Zamorano hat 1+8 on his shirt after someone (Ronaldo?) stole his #9 shirt.

 

When Zamorano had that for Inter it was brilliant. The little plus sign in between the number was sensational and should be part of football these days. More of it = greater the game. We could include minus, divide symbols etc.

 

What about Vitor Baia and the infamous number 99?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is Viduka 36???

 

 

His weight in stones.

Watch it Ken will get upset at you!

Give you a hint.

3+6=?

 

Why not 18 then?

 

Why not 54 then? :crying:

 

Because 54 is a rubbish number. So is 36. People normally want numbers in the 1-11 because it makes them seem like first teamers. (18 is closer to 11 (and 9) than 36 or 54!)

 

I remember when Zamorano hat 1+8 on his shirt after someone (Ronaldo?) stole his #9 shirt.

:jesuswept:

3+3=6

3+6=9

or

3+3+3=9

We know his arse maybe wide but 333 would truly make him a laughing stock.

People normally want numbers in the 1-11 because it makes them seem like first teamers.

It's not 1984 any more, when was the last time you saw a team take to the field with 1-11 for their players numbers???

Edited by sammynb
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is Viduka 36???

 

 

His weight in stones.

Watch it Ken will get upset at you!

Give you a hint.

3+6=?

 

Why not 18 then?

 

Why not 54 then? :jesuswept:

 

Because 54 is a rubbish number. So is 36. People normally want numbers in the 1-11 because it makes them seem like first teamers. (18 is closer to 11 (and 9) than 36 or 54!)

 

I remember when Zamorano hat 1+8 on his shirt after someone (Ronaldo?) stole his #9 shirt.

:PMT:

3+3=6

3+6=9

or

3+3+3=9

We know his arse maybe wide but 333 would truly make him a laughing stock.

People normally want numbers in the 1-11 because it makes them seem like first teamers.

It's not 1984 any more, when was the last time you saw a team take to the field with 1-11 for their players numbers???

 

Last time I watched Elgin. :crying:

 

Nearly always, the best players in every squad will be in the 1-11 range. Obviously there will be exceptions but the majority will have a low number.

 

Do not use Stephen Carr as an example if you reply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.