Torres 0 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 What about Jamie Carragher who - on the pitch - threw a coin that hit and Arsenal fan in the head that could have put his eye out. How long should they have banned him for? Both Scousers too On 28th February 2008, Carragher was arrested and cautioned for assault outside a school near his home in Crosby. Liverpool F.C. refused to comment. How long for that then? Not exactly setting a good example... 'could have' is not the same thing 'did', Carra reacted to something being thrown at him and was of sober mind. He didn`t go on a drunken rampage and beat up a minor. How you could possibly compare the two is mindboggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 What about Jamie Carragher who - on the pitch - threw a coin that hit and Arsenal fan in the head that could have put his eye out. How long should they have banned him for? Both Scousers too On 28th February 2008, Carragher was arrested and cautioned for assault outside a school near his home in Crosby. Liverpool F.C. refused to comment. How long for that then? Not exactly setting a good example... It might be an idea to poison the water supply for Merseyside. The white cider supply would probably be more beneficial. Aye. No reply from Torres either Give him a break, 'laaah'. He's hiding behind the sofa at the moment because the 'bizzies' are calling at his door looking for 'scallies'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13836 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 What about Jamie Carragher who - on the pitch - threw a coin that hit and Arsenal fan in the head that could have put his eye out. How long should they have banned him for? Both Scousers too On 28th February 2008, Carragher was arrested and cautioned for assault outside a school near his home in Crosby. Liverpool F.C. refused to comment. How long for that then? Not exactly setting a good example... 'could have' is not the same thing 'did', Carra reacted to something being thrown at him and was of sober mind. He didn`t go on a drunken rampage and beat up a minor. How you could possibly compare the two is mindboggling. A 16 year old is not a minor, plus Barton didn't go on a rampage, people took the piss out of him - something probably very sensitive to his heart - he was drunk - he lashed out - and you say he should be banned for a season? Surely a sober professional football player taking a chunk out of a fans head is worse. And what about the assault incident, again when sober I presume... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 What about Jamie Carragher who - on the pitch - threw a coin that hit and Arsenal fan in the head that could have put his eye out. How long should they have banned him for? Both Scousers too On 28th February 2008, Carragher was arrested and cautioned for assault outside a school near his home in Crosby. Liverpool F.C. refused to comment. How long for that then? Not exactly setting a good example... 'could have' is not the same thing 'did', Carra reacted to something being thrown at him and was of sober mind. He didn`t go on a drunken rampage and beat up a minor. How you could possibly compare the two is mindboggling. A 16 year old is not a minor, plus Barton didn't go on a rampage, people took the piss out of him - something probably very sensitive to his heart - he was drunk - he lashed out - and you say he should be banned for a season? Surely a sober professional football player taking a chunk out of a fans head is worse. And what about the assault incident, again when sober I presume... A. A 16 year old is a minor. B. A chunk wasn`t taken out of anybody`s head. And the courts clearly don`t think it was worse than Barton`s offence and I fully agree. Only a nit-wit would think otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13836 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 What about Jamie Carragher who - on the pitch - threw a coin that hit and Arsenal fan in the head that could have put his eye out. How long should they have banned him for? Both Scousers too On 28th February 2008, Carragher was arrested and cautioned for assault outside a school near his home in Crosby. Liverpool F.C. refused to comment. How long for that then? Not exactly setting a good example... 'could have' is not the same thing 'did', Carra reacted to something being thrown at him and was of sober mind. He didn`t go on a drunken rampage and beat up a minor. How you could possibly compare the two is mindboggling. A 16 year old is not a minor, plus Barton didn't go on a rampage, people took the piss out of him - something probably very sensitive to his heart - he was drunk - he lashed out - and you say he should be banned for a season? Surely a sober professional football player taking a chunk out of a fans head is worse. And what about the assault incident, again when sober I presume... A. A 16 year old is a minor. B. A chunk wasn`t taken out of anybody`s head. And the courts clearly don`t think it was worse than Barton`s offence and I fully agree. Only a nit-wit would think otherwise. So assault outside a School is OK? That's how Carragher is allowed to behave? You were caught guilty of blatant double standards, now back in the bin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 You shouldn`t be so touchy about it...................Barton has hardly set the world alight as a footballer either, a spell in the nick will do him good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13836 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 I'm not touchy, I'm right. Now Back in the bin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 You shouldn`t be so touchy about it...................Barton has hardly set the world alight as a footballer either, a spell in the nick will do him good. Lets hope so. Could actually sort him out imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Sorry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 You shouldn`t be so touchy about it...................Barton has hardly set the world alight as a footballer either, a spell in the nick will do him good. Lets hope so. Could actually sort him out imo. I agree. Hope he sorts himself out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Edit: thought that was a reply to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Sorry? It was a reply to a daft post by T-Keith, where he claims to be right without any ground whatsoever to back it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13836 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Sorry? It was a reply to a daft post by T-Keith, where he claims to be right without any ground whatsoever to back it up. An assault outside a school is just as bad as what Barton did, given the circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Sorry? It was a reply to a daft post by T-Keith, where he claims to be right without any ground whatsoever to back it up. An assault outside a school is just as bad as what Barton did, given the circumstances. No it fucking isn't man. If it was as bad as Barton's would he have only been cautioned? Of course not. Barton's offence is in a completely different league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Sorry? It was a reply to a daft post by T-Keith, where he claims to be right without any ground whatsoever to back it up. An assault outside a school is just as bad as what Barton did, given the circumstances. No it fucking isn't man. If it was as bad as Barton's would he have only been cautioned? Of course not. Barton's offence is in a completely different league. Agree 100%. A voice of reason at last. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Sorry? It was a reply to a daft post by T-Keith, where he claims to be right without any ground whatsoever to back it up. An assault outside a school is just as bad as what Barton did, given the circumstances. No it fucking isn't man. If it was as bad as Barton's would he have only been cautioned? Of course not. Barton's offence is in a completely different league. Who knows, I know someone that quite literally got away with murder, or at least only served 12-18 months on a much lesser charge for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Sorry? It was a reply to a daft post by T-Keith, where he claims to be right without any ground whatsoever to back it up. An assault outside a school is just as bad as what Barton did, given the circumstances. No it fucking isn't man. If it was as bad as Barton's would he have only been cautioned? Of course not. Barton's offence is in a completely different league. Who knows, I know someone that quite literally got away with murder, or at least only served 12-18 months on a much lesser charge for it. Whatever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Not according to the legal system..........hehehe Sorry? It was a reply to a daft post by T-Keith, where he claims to be right without any ground whatsoever to back it up. An assault outside a school is just as bad as what Barton did, given the circumstances. No it fucking isn't man. If it was as bad as Barton's would he have only been cautioned? Of course not. Barton's offence is in a completely different league. Who knows, I know someone that quite literally got away with murder, or at least only served 12-18 months on a much lesser charge for it. Whatever But completely true, I've even mentioned it before here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 And largely irrelevent to this discussion. Do you really think what Carragher did was anything like what Barton did? If not, what's your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13836 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 There is never any point once Torres enters a thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 There is never any point once Torres enters a thread. Talking more sense than you in this one T. The Carragher comparison was laughable imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13836 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 Punching a 16 year old! He has problems. Should be banned for at least a season. There is never any point once Torres enters a thread. Talking more sense than you in this one T. The Carragher comparison was laughable imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torres 0 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 There is never any point once Torres enters a thread. I think you`d miss me if I didn`t............................and I couldn`t have that on my conscience now could I. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted May 29, 2008 Share Posted May 29, 2008 And largely irrelevent to this discussion. Do you really think what Carragher did was anything like what Barton did? If not, what's your point? That you can get away with anything in the right circumstances, or conversely get reamed. The law is an ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now