Fop 1 Posted November 10, 2008 Share Posted November 10, 2008 what can I add? :D The woman just goes out and proves me right........................ Gold Bars or Gold Medal ?? Easy choice for the People's Paula - plus she got a free ticket to Beijing at our expense no doubt by the time of London 2012 she'll be living in New Zealand Legend I can never ever disagree with you regarding this matter Rob! I actually feel sad at being proved right - much the same as the cycling drug fiends - you really want them to be nice, and good and honest but ...... it never works out Really? Because imo despite not being proven to be correct you're still smug as fuck about thinking you have been. Lot of it going around. It's contagious. No known cure or vaccine either. Well actually..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted November 12, 2008 Share Posted November 12, 2008 (edited) I think I'll vote for her in the Sports Review of the Year - she's sure to be on the list - the Beeb have too much invested in her.............. and she deserves something to make up for the disappointment of only getting $$$$$$$$$$$$ and not a Gold Medal Edited November 12, 2008 by Rob W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay 8 Posted November 12, 2008 Share Posted November 12, 2008 http://www.foddy.net/Athletics.html Managed 4 meters so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shakermaker 0 Posted November 12, 2008 Share Posted November 12, 2008 (edited) what can I add? The woman just goes out and proves me right........................ Gold Bars or Gold Medal ?? Easy choice for the People's Paula - plus she got a free ticket to Beijing at our expense no doubt by the time of London 2012 she'll be living in New Zealand too right,she obviously doesn't give a shit about all the extra advertising revenue she could have earned as an olympic gold medal winner. conversly all the cyclists,rebecca adlington etc only tried so hard as it is their only shot at the limelight hence only chance to make a bit of cash with endorsments etc. Edited November 12, 2008 by shakermaker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted November 12, 2008 Share Posted November 12, 2008 Apparently if you keep saying the same thing again and again it eventually becomes true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay 8 Posted November 12, 2008 Share Posted November 12, 2008 Apparently if you keep saying the same thing again and again it eventually becomes true. I find my mum saying it also helps. "He is such a nice and handsome boy." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16628 Posted November 12, 2008 Author Share Posted November 12, 2008 what can I add? The woman just goes out and proves me right........................ Gold Bars or Gold Medal ?? Easy choice for the People's Paula - plus she got a free ticket to Beijing at our expense no doubt by the time of London 2012 she'll be living in New Zealand too right,she obviously doesn't give a shit about all the extra advertising revenue she could have earned as an olympic gold medal winner. conversly all the cyclists,rebecca adlington etc only tried so hard as it is their only shot at the limelight hence only chance to make a bit of cash with endorsments etc. She is already an advertisers wet dream though? How much more will she make winning gold? Not a lot I would think. I sort of get what youre saying about the cycling. Yes the audiance is massive compared to the World Cycle games, the world biking world cups etc, but for these the Olympics ISNT the top of their sport! It is for media coverage etc, but sponsership etc, not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 38739 Posted November 12, 2008 Share Posted November 12, 2008 Paula's just signed a £3million ad deal with Tena lady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16628 Posted October 15, 2012 Author Share Posted October 15, 2012 http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/19946927 WTF She was Lottery funded! Disgrace! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16628 Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 Several rumours going around that Radcliffe is the one who tested positive Linky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClubSpinDoctor 0 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 You'd think she'd be make her urine less readily available if she had something to hide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16628 Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 You'd think she'd be make her urine less readily available if she had something to hide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30382 Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Fop :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3194 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 She was pregnant during the time it is claimed the tests were done. I may be wrong but pregnancy could give false readings couldn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34422 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I can't imagine Radcliffe was up to no good. She won't shut her face whenever anyone else is done for cheating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16628 Posted December 17, 2014 Author Share Posted December 17, 2014 She was pregnant during the time it is claimed the tests were done. I may be wrong but pregnancy could give false readings couldn't it? Aye, apparently it drops your hematocrit level. But, it doesn't answer why her martahon times in ridiculously fast...... If and a big IF it is her then she and British Athletics will have massive egg on their face. Considering how anti doping she is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30382 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 She was a world class marathon runner though, so the times aren't that big a mystery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16628 Posted December 17, 2014 Author Share Posted December 17, 2014 She was a world class marathon runner though, so the times aren't that big a mystery. Compared to the other world class marathons runners...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16628 Posted December 17, 2014 Author Share Posted December 17, 2014 This says it all to me. Same with cycling. Let the big fish carry on swimming and only catch the little fish. Her Marthons times are similar to a 35min ascent of Alpe d'Uhez! (See link note that most have been done for doping or implicated in doping). She has the top 3 times in History, 3rd best is still; a min better than the rest in history, The difference between her best and the nest is 10 years and Keitani later at 3mins 12. Its about as dominant as Armstrong was! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 14031 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 I wouldn't call Jeptoo a "little fish" from a world athletics POV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 14031 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Besides which, I would hardly say that athletics is generally scared of banning high-profile names, just look at the recent history of doping bans in the sport. Obviously there's a credibility gap because they're then free to come back and compete despite (like Gatlin) clearly still being dodgy as fuck, but that's a different matter... Possibly different standards in distance (non-stadium/-Olympic) running though, dunno? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30382 Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 Compared to the other world class marathons runners...... In the past the world record had been broken by bigger margins. Also, because each course can be so different and the conditions play such a large role you can't easily compare performances like you can for track events. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16628 Posted December 17, 2014 Author Share Posted December 17, 2014 Time will tell, I dont think the name will ever make the public domain, but then again nobody thought Lance would be caught. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now