Jump to content

Local press meeting with Llambias


stevietoon
 Share

Recommended Posts

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

 

Ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair he's hardly the chirpiest person in the world. On some sort of 3 day binge moan

 

http://www.toontastic.net/board/index.php?...sult_type=posts

 

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

 

Ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

:lol: sounds like you're the clueless one pal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

 

Derg? Pukka?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

:lol: sounds like you're the clueless one pal.

 

did you read one of their statements recently published on the TF site? unfortunately i can't find the link on the site, but it pretty much gave the impression that it was typed by a bloke who has no idea how to turn off the caps lock and use the spell checker. statement pretty much consisted of, "ASHLEY WHY WON'T YOU SPEAK TO US?" "I DEMAND YOU SPEAK TO NUSC".

 

who the fuck are they to DEMAND that they are spoken to?

why won't nusc realise that it's ashleys club, and he'll do what he wants with it?..

 

thank fuck they have a march organised though, i could have came up with that idea without charge a fee of £10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

:suicide: sounds like you're the clueless one pal.

 

did you read one of their statements recently published on the TF site? unfortunately i can't find the link on the site, but it pretty much gave the impression that it was typed by a bloke who has no idea how to turn off the caps lock and use the spell checker. statement pretty much consisted of, "ASHLEY WHY WON'T YOU SPEAK TO US?" "I DEMAND YOU SPEAK TO NUSC".

 

who the fuck are they to DEMAND that they are spoken to?

why won't nusc realise that it's ashleys club, and he'll do what he wants with it?..

 

thank fuck they have a march organised though, i could have came up with that idea without charge a fee of £10

 

 

What's your point? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

:suicide: sounds like you're the clueless one pal.

 

did you read one of their statements recently published on the TF site? unfortunately i can't find the link on the site, but it pretty much gave the impression that it was typed by a bloke who has no idea how to turn off the caps lock and use the spell checker. statement pretty much consisted of, "ASHLEY WHY WON'T YOU SPEAK TO US?" "I DEMAND YOU SPEAK TO NUSC".

 

who the fuck are they to DEMAND that they are spoken to?

why won't nusc realise that it's ashleys club, and he'll do what he wants with it?..

 

thank fuck they have a march organised though, i could have came up with that idea without charge a fee of £10

 

 

What's your point? :lol:

 

that they're clueless, deluded, money grabbing cunts with their heads up their arse..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

:suicide: sounds like you're the clueless one pal.

 

did you read one of their statements recently published on the TF site? unfortunately i can't find the link on the site, but it pretty much gave the impression that it was typed by a bloke who has no idea how to turn off the caps lock and use the spell checker. statement pretty much consisted of, "ASHLEY WHY WON'T YOU SPEAK TO US?" "I DEMAND YOU SPEAK TO NUSC".

 

who the fuck are they to DEMAND that they are spoken to?

why won't nusc realise that it's ashleys club, and he'll do what he wants with it?..

 

thank fuck they have a march organised though, i could have came up with that idea without charge a fee of £10

 

 

What's your point? :lol:

 

that they're clueless, deluded, money grabbing cunts with their heads up their arse..

 

Have you met any of them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

 

Is that right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no doubt the 'meeting' will reveal fuck all , and the most damning questions were binned / unanswered

 

However the "clueless cunts" that you so highly speak of had a selection of questions agreed with the reporter, all of which were with the proviso that if they arent answered then it will be made clear in the article thats what happened.

 

So you'll know if any of those damning ones were refused because it will say "No Comment" or the like.

 

NUSC are money grabbing attention seeking arseholes , the idea is right but it's ran by whinging old cunts who have published nothing but cringeworthy statements through TF.

:lol:

 

:suicide:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.