Guest CrimsonFault Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Don't know what this means for Stephen Carr, however. Result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Don't know what this means for Stephen Carr, however. Result. 49250[/snapback] A one match ban for Carr I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Hog 336 Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Read this means that Carr gets the yellow, making a red and he misses tomorrow's match. Which he was going to miss anyway as he had an injury. Thats what The Journal was saying this morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM4 0 Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 yeah coz of course, if Carr had been booked in the first half instead of Parker he would have make that tackle in the second half anyway ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChocChip 0 Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Don't know what this means for Stephen Carr, however. Result. 49250[/snapback] A one match ban for Carr I think. 49252[/snapback] The Headline could read 'Carr Parked for 1 game' go on, tell me i'm a wasted talent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Don't know what this means for Stephen Carr, however. Result. 49250[/snapback] A one match ban for Carr I think. 49252[/snapback] The Headline could read 'Carr Parked for 1 game' go on, tell me i'm a wasted talent 49257[/snapback] No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Definitely Maybe 0 Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Disgraceful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Disgraceful 49262[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Can they extend Carr's ban to erm, the whole season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zathras 234 Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Don't know what this means for Stephen Carr, however. Result. 49250[/snapback] A one match ban for Carr I think. 49252[/snapback] The Headline could read 'Carr Parked for 1 game' go on, tell me i'm a wasted talent 49257[/snapback] You're a waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 25, 2005 Share Posted October 25, 2005 Can they extend Carr's ban to erm, the whole season? 49268[/snapback] Racist tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul 0 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 From Football365: http://www.football365.com/teams/newcastle...ry_166893.shtml Refs angry with FA after Parker booking is rescindedWednesday October 26 2005 A row is brewing between the Premiership's referees and the FA after Scott Parker’s booking in the Tyne-Wear derby was overturned. Parker appealed that his yellow card was a case of mistaken identity, arguing that team-mate Steve Carr had in fact felled Andy Welsh. An independent three-man FA commission agreed with Parker and on Tuesday transferred his ban to Carr instead. However, match referee Rob Styles, who wasn't contacted by the commission, insists that he was right to book Parker and Keith Hackett, the head of the Premier League referees association, is 'concerned that the FA are undermining the authority of match officials', reports The Daily Telegraph. "The referee was adamant he did not caution the wrong player," Hackett told the newspaper. "He cautioned Parker for unsporting behaviour and did not consider what Carr did worthy of a yellow card." Hackett accused the commission, who are not believed to have any referring experience, of "re-refereeing" games. Rob Styles is a joke tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I'd love to see Styles in an interview state that he was right, whilst watching the footage. If he was right to book Parker for that, they'll be 44 yellow cards every match. Running = yellow card. Amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I'd love to see Styles in an interview state that he was right, whilst watching the footage. If he was right to book Parker for that, they'll be 44 yellow cards every match. Running = yellow card. Amazing. 49812[/snapback] The dissent seemed to come from Parker after he was booked. Which is understandable given it was a case of mistaken identity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now