Tom 13808 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 Don't flatter yourself or your club. Just because I wont defend your hooligans you go off in a strop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Owld Fecker 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 Don't flatter yourself or your club. Just because I wont defend your hooligans you go off in a strop Not at all, because I will never defend any hooligan either. What I do recognise is a keyboard warrior who is not fit to be a mod/administrator. Please combine sex with travel, in short jerky movements and (unless you have something constructive to add) please don't reply to my posts in future! I find you an embarrassment! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13808 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 You are a very poorly veiled wind up merchant and you in no way, opinion or otherwise will dictate which posts I reply to and which ones I will not. Keep fishing at your peril... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Owld Fecker 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 You are a very poorly veiled wind up merchant and you in no way, opinion or otherwise will dictate which posts I reply to and which ones I will not. Keep fishing at your peril... Me a "wind up" merchant? I don't think so. You, on the other hand, don't know when to stop! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentAxeman 82 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 FUCKIN HELL!! 6M Could have had Butt for half that!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teed 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 In Bent.........£10 million Campbell...£3.5 million Cana........£5 million Cattermole.£6 million Da Silva.....£500,000 Total = £25 million Out Halford.......£2.5 million Whitehead...£3 million Chopra.......£4 million Murphy.......£1.5 million (looking likely he is going) Total = £11 million Canny job Bruce, canny job! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smoggeordie 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 Out of interest, have you ever seen Cana or Da Silva play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teed 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 Out of interest, have you ever seen Cana or Da Silva play? TBH no,but they are both internationals,captains of their respective countrys,come highly rated and must be better than Whithead and the Noz,so onwards and upwards...slowly,slowly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 Out of interest, have you ever seen Cana or Da Silva play? TBH no,but they are both internationals,captains of their respective countrys,come highly rated and must be better than Whithead and the Noz,so onwards and upwards...slowly,slowly... Bruce had a decent record at Wigan for finding unheard-of's that settled straight away in the prem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The messenger 0 Posted August 12, 2009 Share Posted August 12, 2009 (edited) Darren Bent wasn't £ 10 Mill, he was £ 16.5 Mill. Just like Cattermole is reported at £ 8 Mill after clauses are paid. So unless you plan for both your signing to be shit and complete flops, your total expenditure is at £ 33.5 Mill, not £ 25 Mill. Edited. Got the Bent valuation wrong. Edited August 12, 2009 by The messenger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13808 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Cattermole is £8m + £2m in clauses and £60k a week . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 2929 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 More than anything Cattermole's fee is an example of how deluded Ashley and his cunt hook mates are that a club can be competitively run on no budget. Players cost and wanting good players to relocate to places that aren't London, Madrid, etc, cost more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 70 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 You are a very poorly veiled wind up merchant and you in no way, opinion or otherwise will dictate which posts I reply to and which ones I will not. Keep fishing at your peril... Kill him Tom!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinofbeans 86 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 i'm thinking quite a few people have missed the point here. a decent defensive midfielder is critical in the top flight and one of the reasons we got relegated last year is because our one or 2 players that played there were consistently not good enough.... cana and cattermole are both examples of the modern defensive midfielder come good , because without them their sides would not have done as well as they had (look at boro with and without for example, marseille went v close to the championship in france with cana playing). both are on inflated fees and both are card happy, but i get the feeling bruce will only play one or t'other. both can get it down and pass, something our own nicky butt has never really been able to do. in short he's addressed the most glaringly obvious problem in his side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 2929 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 i'm thinking quite a few people have missed the point here. a decent defensive midfielder is critical in the top flight and one of the reasons we got relegated last year is because our one or 2 players that played there were consistently not good enough.... cana and cattermole are both examples of the modern defensive midfielder come good , because without them their sides would not have done as well as they had (look at boro with and without for example, marseille went v close to the championship in france with cana playing). both are on inflated fees and both are card happy, but i get the feeling bruce will only play one or t'other. both can get it down and pass, something our own nicky butt has never really been able to do. in short he's addressed the most glaringly obvious problem in his side. And watch Malbranque flourish with a decent DM next to him. It's not rocket science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinofbeans 86 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 i'm thinking quite a few people have missed the point here. a decent defensive midfielder is critical in the top flight and one of the reasons we got relegated last year is because our one or 2 players that played there were consistently not good enough.... cana and cattermole are both examples of the modern defensive midfielder come good , because without them their sides would not have done as well as they had (look at boro with and without for example, marseille went v close to the championship in france with cana playing). both are on inflated fees and both are card happy, but i get the feeling bruce will only play one or t'other. both can get it down and pass, something our own nicky butt has never really been able to do. in short he's addressed the most glaringly obvious problem in his side. And watch Malbranque flourish with a decent DM next to him. It's not rocket science. exactly.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2188 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 i'm thinking quite a few people have missed the point here. a decent defensive midfielder is critical in the top flight and one of the reasons we got relegated last year is because our one or 2 players that played there were consistently not good enough.... cana and cattermole are both examples of the modern defensive midfielder come good , because without them their sides would not have done as well as they had (look at boro with and without for example, marseille went v close to the championship in france with cana playing). both are on inflated fees and both are card happy, but i get the feeling bruce will only play one or t'other. both can get it down and pass, something our own nicky butt has never really been able to do. in short he's addressed the most glaringly obvious problem in his side. And watch Malbranque flourish with a decent DM next to him. It's not rocket science. Unless you're a 62 year old bullshitting lickspittle with a dodgy ticker who doesn't bother turning up to training? I'm not thinking of anyone in particular....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Lazaru 0 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 i'm thinking quite a few people have missed the point here. a decent defensive midfielder is critical in the top flight and one of the reasons we got relegated last year is because our one or 2 players that played there were consistently not good enough.... cana and cattermole are both examples of the modern defensive midfielder come good , because without them their sides would not have done as well as they had (look at boro with and without for example, marseille went v close to the championship in france with cana playing). both are on inflated fees and both are card happy, but i get the feeling bruce will only play one or t'other. both can get it down and pass, something our own nicky butt has never really been able to do. in short he's addressed the most glaringly obvious problem in his side. I agree, he's not a world beater, but he does that job well and will be a big improvement for them. The fee is too big but thats the way of things, you have to pay that these days. He is however a dirty little bastard who deliberately sets out to injure players no matter how much he and Bruce have denied it, but the mackems will be more than happy with him since he injured two of our players in his Wigan days! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teed 0 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Cattermole is £8m + £2m in clauses and £60k a week . Cattermole is £6 mil rising to £8 mil,as to the 60k a week.. I dont think so Bent £10 rising to £14. but when and if we reach the stage where add on`s were to be paid for these players,I`m sure we`d only be to happy pay up,the triggers that bring these clauses into place would mean silverware in the cupboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The messenger 0 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 (edited) Cattermole is £8m + £2m in clauses and £60k a week . Cattermole is £6 mil rising to £8 mil,as to the 60k a week.. I dont think so Bent £10 rising to £14. but when and if we reach the stage where add on`s were to be paid for these players,I`m sure we`d only be to happy pay up,the triggers that bring these clauses into place would mean silverware in the cupboard. No that's wrong. Bent is rising to £ 16.5 Mill according to spurz stock exchange that can hardly lie. So stop telling porkies. Edited August 13, 2009 by The messenger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Cattermole is £8m + £2m in clauses and £60k a week . Cattermole is £6 mil rising to £8 mil,as to the 60k a week.. I dont think so Bent £10 rising to £14. but when and if we reach the stage where add on`s were to be paid for these players,I`m sure we`d only be to happy pay up,the triggers that bring these clauses into place would mean silverware in the cupboard. I quite like these thinly veiled brags. No, I really do. Still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teed 0 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Cattermole is £8m + £2m in clauses and £60k a week . Cattermole is £6 mil rising to £8 mil,as to the 60k a week.. I dont think so Bent £10 rising to £14. but when and if we reach the stage where add on`s were to be paid for these players,I`m sure we`d only be to happy pay up,the triggers that bring these clauses into place would mean silverware in the cupboard. No that's wrong. Bent is rising to £ 16.5 Mill according to spurz stock exchange that can hardly lie. So stop telling porkies. For the fee to rise to £16.5 we`d have to win the world cup (England) Bent playing and scoring a bucket full and Sunderland winning the CL,though that would be nice,I can`t see either of those happening can you? Levys face saving clauses,If and it`s a very,very big if! the fee rises to 14 mil the club would be happy to pay the extra I`m sure. thinly veiled brags Not really,just fact I`m looking at a mid table finish TBH that would do fine.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 8949 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 It's a sad state of play, when a team like sunderaland looks like a midtable Premiership club. Hull, Birmingham, Burnley, Stoke, Bolton, Wigan, are all shit. My thoughts on the table, fwiw 1 Chelsea 2 Manchester United 3 Liverpool 4 Manchester City 5 Arsenal 6 Aston Villa 7 Everton 8 Tottenham 9 Fulham 10 West Ham 11 Wigan 12 Sunderland 13 Bolton 14 Blackburn 15 Stoke 16 Birmingham 17 Wolves 18 Hull 19 Portsmouth 20 Burnley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Lazaru 0 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 Cattermole is £8m + £2m in clauses and £60k a week . Cattermole is £6 mil rising to £8 mil,as to the 60k a week.. I dont think so Bent £10 rising to £14. but when and if we reach the stage where add on`s were to be paid for these players,I`m sure we`d only be to happy pay up,the triggers that bring these clauses into place would mean silverware in the cupboard. No that's wrong. Bent is rising to £ 16.5 Mill according to spurz stock exchange that can hardly lie. So stop telling porkies. For the fee to rise to £16.5 we`d have to win the world cup (England) Bent playing and scoring a bucket full and Sunderland winning the CL,though that would be nice,I can`t see either of those happening can you? Levys face saving clauses,If and it`s a very,very big if! the fee rises to 14 mil the club would be happy to pay the extra I`m sure. thinly veiled brags Not really,just fact I`m looking at a mid table finish TBH that would do fine.. And i think you'll get it, Bruce is a solid prem manager, Bent is a proven scorer in the prem when he's given a chance, Cattermole will be effective and Bruce seems to have the knack of finding unknown foreign players who go on to do well. Hope i'm wrong tho! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinofbeans 86 Posted August 13, 2009 Share Posted August 13, 2009 nearly there fish... this is what i see... 1 Chelsea 2 Manchester United 3 Liverpool 4 Arsenal 5 Manchester City 6 Aston Villa 7 Everton 8 Tottenham 9 Fulham 10 West Ham 11 Bolton 12 Sunderland 13 Wigan 14 Blackburn 15 Stoke 16 Burnley 17 Birmingham 18 Hull 19 Portsmouth 20 Wolves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now