Isegrim 8868 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 So do you lot reckon Bobby Robson should have walked away when we signed Kluivert and Butt and then sued the club for the rest of his contract? Why didn't he? Because he actually does love the club? It's Sir Bobby Robson to you That's what it says Would've been more impressive if you'd edited it in your quote as well. Hey ho. Any answer to the question, btw? We would probably have been far better off if Robson had taken a harder stance with the board room and got the players he wanted. On the other hand we were lucky that Fat Fred and Co. didn't let him go when he wanted to bugger off to manage England again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2188 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 So do you lot reckon Bobby Robson should have walked away when we signed Kluivert and Butt and then sued the club for the rest of his contract? Why didn't he? Because he actually does love the club? It's Sir Bobby Robson to you That's what it says Would've been more impressive if you'd edited it in your quote as well. Hey ho. Any answer to the question, btw? Is there a question worth answering? You're speculating about why Keegan left by speculating what Sir Bobby may have thought if you could draw a parallel between his and Keegan's situations, which you really can't. From which you conclude that Sir Bobby loved the club and Keegan doesn't. Good luck with that one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 So do you lot reckon Bobby Robson should have walked away when we signed Kluivert and Butt and then sued the club for the rest of his contract? Why didn't he? Because he actually does love the club? It's Sir Bobby Robson to you That's what it says Would've been more impressive if you'd edited it in your quote as well. Hey ho. Any answer to the question, btw? We would probably have been far better off if Robson had taken a harder stance with the board room and got the players he wanted. On the other hand we were lucky that Fat Fred and Co. didn't let him go when he wanted to bugger off to manage England again... My point is that Keegan didn't do this and just saw the opportunity to walk away and claim constructive dismissal. We wouldn't be in this league now if Keegan had actually put up a fight for transfer control instead of just throwing the towel (dummy) in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giraffidae 0 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 and Sir Bobby didn’t take any compensation from NUFC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 and Sir Bobby didn’t take any compensation from NUFC? Why does Keegan need compensation? He fucking walked! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giraffidae 0 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 his tribunal hearing is for constructive dismissal = sacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 his tribunal hearing is for constructive dismissal = sacked. Legally right isn't always morally right. He could purposefully lose every game so that he gets sacked and his contract paid up and he'd be legally entitled to it, but he wouldn't deserve it. Just like he doesn't deserve 3 years wages after throwing his toys out of the pram 8 months in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 The irony of Thompers having a pop at someone for throwing their toys out of the pram is exquisite, I must say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giraffidae 0 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 his tribunal hearing is for constructive dismissal = sacked. Legally right isn't always morally right. He could purposefully lose every game so that he gets sacked and his contract paid up and he'd be legally entitled to it, but he wouldn't deserve it. Just like he doesn't deserve 3 years wages after throwing his toys out of the pram 8 months in. so you know what has been going on behind the scenes and the non disclosure? Or just a blind, ill-informed judgement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! So you're naive enough to buy Ashley's patter (which is what these leaked stories are imo) and think that (assuming he has been offered £4m already) another £4m will be the difference between the club going into administration or not? You couldn't make this shit up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! So you're naive enough to buy Ashley's patter (which is what these leaked stories are imo) and think that (assuming he has been offered £4m already) another £4m will be the difference between the club going into administration or not? You couldn't make this shit up I was exaggerating, clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! So you're naive enough to buy Ashley's patter (which is what these leaked stories are imo) and think that (assuming he has been offered £4m already) another £4m will be the difference between the club going into administration or not? You couldn't make this shit up I was exaggerating, clearly. So what was your point then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8868 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 his tribunal hearing is for constructive dismissal = sacked. Legally right isn't always morally right. He could purposefully lose every game so that he gets sacked and his contract paid up and he'd be legally entitled to it, but he wouldn't deserve it. Just like he doesn't deserve 3 years wages after throwing his toys out of the pram 8 months in. Constructive dismissal means that the employer has behaved like a total w*nker. I can't see anything morally wrong in an employer then being entitled to his money - and that is why he gets it legally. On the other hand an employer who totally neglects his working duties would be entitled to f*ck all in case he gets sacked because of it - morally and legally. Actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! So you're naive enough to buy Ashley's patter (which is what these leaked stories are imo) and think that (assuming he has been offered £4m already) another £4m will be the difference between the club going into administration or not? You couldn't make this shit up I was exaggerating, clearly. So what was your point then? That Keegan winning will have only negative effects on the club and the club cannot benefit from it in any way, shape, or form? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! So you're naive enough to buy Ashley's patter (which is what these leaked stories are imo) and think that (assuming he has been offered £4m already) another £4m will be the difference between the club going into administration or not? You couldn't make this shit up I was exaggerating, clearly. So what was your point then? That Keegan winning will have only negative effects on the club and the club cannot benefit from it in any way, shape, or form? Just repeating yourself then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 his tribunal hearing is for constructive dismissal = sacked. Legally right isn't always morally right. He could purposefully lose every game so that he gets sacked and his contract paid up and he'd be legally entitled to it, but he wouldn't deserve it. Just like he doesn't deserve 3 years wages after throwing his toys out of the pram 8 months in. Constructive dismissal means that the employer has behaved like a total w*nker. I can't see anything morally wrong in an employer then being entitled to his money - and that is why he gets it legally. On the other hand an employer who totally neglects his working duties would be entitled to f*ck all in case he gets sacked because of it - morally and legally. Actually. I can't understand this until you recongise the difference between and employer and an employee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! So you're naive enough to buy Ashley's patter (which is what these leaked stories are imo) and think that (assuming he has been offered £4m already) another £4m will be the difference between the club going into administration or not? You couldn't make this shit up I was exaggerating, clearly. So what was your point then? That Keegan winning will have only negative effects on the club and the club cannot benefit from it in any way, shape, or form? Just repeating yourself then? Until it gets through Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 More chance of convincing me James Blunt is the best thing since sliced bread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 38571 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 More chance of convincing me James Blunt is the best thing since sliced bread. Erm... riiiiiighto... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! Keegan walking away now and saying keep the cash mike I love the club too much would teach Ashley that he could do what he liked. I believe personally that the future of this club will be darker if KK loses than it would if he gets £8 mill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! Keegan walking away now and saying keep the cash mike I love the club too much would teach Ashley that he could do what he liked. I believe personally that the future of this club will be darker if KK loses than it would if he gets £8 mill. I'd go along with that. £4m is really neither here nor there in the grand scheme of things. There's more at stake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonatine 9941 Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 The only resentment I feel is towards myself for taking the time to read all this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Hova Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Keegan, bankrupt the club and wipe it off the face of the planettttt! OMGGGZZZ this will so teach that meany Ashley a lesson!! Yay! Keegster FTW! Keegan walking away now and saying keep the cash mike I love the club too much would teach Ashley that he could do what he liked. I believe personally that the future of this club will be darker if KK loses than it would if he gets £8 mill. I don't think Keegan winning would 'put him in his place'. I think he's a very vindictive man, and would be a very sore loser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now