LeazesMag 0 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 thompers is fuming now You're back on ignore Leazes, I don't respect anybody with hypocritical views ah diddums. Does anybody else think that running a football club is the same as running the country ? No, probably not. Wait though - were the UK in the top 5 in their league table under Labour ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin 1 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 you two are tedious as fuck tbh Nah its just that skidmark fuck face. Prick said he was leaving this website. Prick, i knew he'd be back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 thompers is fuming now You're back on ignore Leazes, I don't respect anybody with hypocritical views ah diddums. Does anybody else think that running a football club is the same as running the country ? No, probably not. Wait though - were the UK in the top 5 in their league table under Labour ? It's not the same, but the credentials of judging whether a leader is good surely are. The labour government had us in the top tier of countries globally, and were ambitious and still investing money, which is almost identical to your defence of the Shepherd reign. Do you accept the concept that investing money (backing their appointed employees) is wasting money, unless you employ the right people to spend it? Do you accept that it is possible to be incompetent and still be one of the leading players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 thompers is fuming now You're back on ignore Leazes, I don't respect anybody with hypocritical views ah diddums. Does anybody else think that running a football club is the same as running the country ? No, probably not. Wait though - were the UK in the top 5 in their league table under Labour ? It's not the same, but the credentials of judging whether a leader is good surely are. The labour government had us in the top tier of countries globally, and were ambitious and still investing money, which is almost identical to your defence of the Shepherd reign. Do you accept the concept that investing money (backing their appointed employees) is wasting money, unless you employ the right people to spend it? Do you accept that it is possible to be incompetent and still be one of the leading players? how many clubs "appointed the right people" over the 15 years that I presume you are referring to that did better than we did ? is anybody else on this message board thick enough to suggest that running the country is the same as running a football club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 thompers is fuming now You're back on ignore Leazes, I don't respect anybody with hypocritical views ah diddums. Does anybody else think that running a football club is the same as running the country ? No, probably not. Wait though - were the UK in the top 5 in their league table under Labour ? It's not the same, but the credentials of judging whether a leader is good surely are. The labour government had us in the top tier of countries globally, and were ambitious and still investing money, which is almost identical to your defence of the Shepherd reign. Do you accept the concept that investing money (backing their appointed employees) is wasting money, unless you employ the right people to spend it? Do you accept that it is possible to be incompetent and still be one of the leading players? how many clubs "appointed the right people" over the 15 years that I presume you are referring to that did better than we did ? is anybody else on this message board thick enough to suggest that running the country is the same as running a football club I haven't suggested that you daft pissed up cunt, and you completely ignored my questions what a surprise How many other countries have 'appointed the right people' over the 15 years that did better economically than we did under labour? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 I'm surprised that you criticise labour on the whole for spending. Surely the 'fuckpig' here was the former chancellor? All labour did was make their appointments and back them, which should surely be praised, right Leazes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 I don't think he is Thompers btw. And, ordinarily, that would be a compliment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 More than 500 managers and administrators face redundancy in a huge shake-up of the NHS across the north-east of England. The proposed cuts will affect NHS trusts on Tyneside, Wearside, County Durham and Teesside and aim to deliver annual savings of £27m. NHS North East said it hoped to avoid significant compulsory job losses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-10986595 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now