Jump to content

Long range Goals


Rob W
 Share

Recommended Posts

According to the "indie" this morning 31% of our goals have been scored from outside the Penalty Area - only Liverpool have scored more (33%) = crap strikers I guess

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No stat is meaningless

 

 

This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats manc-mag territory tbh. Anything from 25-50 yards out and I'm in range. Top right hand corner a speciality. FACT.

65793[/snapback]

Pro-evo tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats manc-mag territory tbh. Anything from 25-50 yards out and I'm in range. Top right hand corner a speciality. FACT.

65793[/snapback]

Pro-evo tbh.

65796[/snapback]

 

Stockport and District Sunday League Division 2 tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats manc-mag territory tbh. Anything from 25-50 yards out and I'm in range. Top right hand corner a speciality. FACT.

65793[/snapback]

Pro-evo tbh.

65796[/snapback]

 

Stockport and District Sunday League Division 2 tbh.

65797[/snapback]

 

Under 11's :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No stat is meaningless

 

 

This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be

65795[/snapback]

 

 

No it doesn't.

65805[/snapback]

 

pedantic tbh. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats manc-mag territory tbh. Anything from 25-50 yards out and I'm in range. Top right hand corner a speciality. FACT.

65793[/snapback]

Pro-evo tbh.

65796[/snapback]

 

Stockport and District Sunday League Division 2 tbh.

65797[/snapback]

 

Under 11's :lol:

65808[/snapback]

 

I only get a game when theres under 11 of us. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No stat is meaningless

 

 

This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be

65795[/snapback]

It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to think we didn't score nearly enough goals from outsied the area. One day we'll learn to do both and might win something.

65830[/snapback]

 

 

Most the goals we've scored from my memory this season have been close range efforts, I thought? I'm confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to think we didn't score nearly enough goals from outsied the area. One day we'll learn to do both and might win something.

65830[/snapback]

 

 

Most the goals we've scored from my memory this season have been close range efforts, I thought? I'm confused.

65833[/snapback]

 

79% of stats are made up I think, so that probably explains it. It doesn't surprise me actually, as 31% isn't that much seeing as we haven't scored many goals. Haven't the mackems scored more league goals than us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No stat is meaningless

 

 

This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be

65795[/snapback]

 

 

No it doesn't.

65805[/snapback]

 

 

actually you are right - it means we're scoring a higher than PL average of our goals from a distance

 

Route 1 strikers in other words

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No stat is meaningless

 

 

This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be

65795[/snapback]

It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo.

65831[/snapback]

 

 

You've just proved my point - a simple stat and you've seen at least 5 posiible answers

 

Are you a research scientist perchance???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No stat is meaningless

 

 

This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be

65795[/snapback]

It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo.

65831[/snapback]

 

 

You've just proved my point - a simple stat and you've seen at least 5 posiible answers

 

Are you a research scientist perchance???

65901[/snapback]

What I meant was the stat in itself isn't meaningful because it doesn't give enough info. So I've proved you wrong. Also, the point above about it meaning we have route one strikers is bollocks; it may well be the case but the stat you gave neither proves or disproves that. Nice try though :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No stat is meaningless

 

 

This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be

65795[/snapback]

It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo.

65831[/snapback]

 

 

You've just proved my point - a simple stat and you've seen at least 5 posiible answers

 

Are you a research scientist perchance???

65901[/snapback]

What I meant was the stat in itself isn't meaningful because it doesn't give enough info. So I've proved you wrong. Also, the point above about it meaning we have route one strikers is bollocks; it may well be the case but the stat you gave neither proves or disproves that. Nice try though :lol:

65934[/snapback]

 

hey they're running a Dickens serial on radio 4 at 19:45 .......................... :lol:;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No stat is meaningless

 

 

This one shows we aren't scoring goals at close range - which is where the strikers (cough cough splutter) are supposed to be

65795[/snapback]

It shows that 31% of our goals were scored from outside the box. It doesn't show how many were free-kicks, it doesn't say how many of those score closer in were from just inside the box, how many of the other 69% were from headers from set-pieces, how many were tap-ins, how many were pens. So to slightly alter my initial statement, it's a pretty meaningless stat imo.

65831[/snapback]

 

 

You've just proved my point - a simple stat and you've seen at least 5 posiible answers

 

Are you a research scientist perchance???

65901[/snapback]

What I meant was the stat in itself isn't meaningful because it doesn't give enough info. So I've proved you wrong. Also, the point above about it meaning we have route one strikers is bollocks; it may well be the case but the stat you gave neither proves or disproves that. Nice try though :lol:

65934[/snapback]

 

hey they're running a Dickens serial on radio 4 at 19:45 .......................... ;);)

65940[/snapback]

Are you sure it isn't an adaptation of a novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.