Sports Direct staff members hope for 44,000 each

[Kitman 2188]

The ironic thing is that people keep bleating to get me banned.

 

Because your crack really is rotten?

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

The ironic thing is that people keep bleating to get me banned.

 

Because your crack really is rotten?

No, it isn't. I wash it with soap and water thrice a day.

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

but this tool, and all the other new tools have ruined this forum.

Next time, go to homebase

[asteroidblitz 12]

Almost 500 clueless cipka posts from this fat melon-headed Jaruzelski apologist in just four months. ffs

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

Almost 500 clueless cipka posts from this fat melon-headed Jaruzelski apologist in just four months. ffs

but I am certainly not a Jaruzelski apologist!

[asteroidblitz 12]

You're a cretinous burak. Go outside and knock one out at all the glorious Polish sunshine fanny instead of mithering the poor souls on here.

[Guest alex]

Nick, do you shag the people you kill before or after they die? Just wondered as I reckon you look like a corpse fucker.

[CleeToonFan 1]

I don't get all this "They all deserve 44k each anyway" lark. It takes little talent to be on the Sports Direct shop floor, not that I have anything against anyone who has the job or anything, but you don't need talent or anything, giving them all 44k bonuses would be like going to the Dole queue and giving out 20 pound notes to anyone who can spell their name, after all, you can get any old pleb in to replace a shit bottle rung worker, the reason footballers wages are so high is because of the demand, theres not 60million people in Britain who can play top class football so we can't just get in 12k a year shitmunchers to keep up us, what's the point of Ashley owning a Premier League club if he doesn't want to pay premiums? Can't he just buy Leyton Orient and jizz about the League 1 action he's getting, you go with him Nick, sit there calling Ashley a genius for running his little club cheaply, and let the real men talk football.

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

, the reason footballers wages are so high is because of the demand,.

Demand means what people are prepared to pay. And Newcastle United aren't prepared to pay, over a certain level, for footballers. And I am proud of them for this.

 

Let me tell you a story.

 

Once upon a time there was a street, with some houses. In each house, there lived a family. One of the family's was called the Eipgam family. One day, during a period of credit boom, all the family's except the Eipgam family, started becoming very extravagant. Not all the family's wanted to be extravagant, but with kids it can be difficult to withstand their nagging, when they see other kids with the most expensive trainers. And of course, what happened was the the most expensive trainers just got even more expensive.

 

ANother family, called the Pompey family, were among the most extravagant. My oh my how much they spent, and the amazing this is that they had rubbish taste, too. They would spend 100s of thousands of pounds on dross.

 

The Eipgam family, as mentioned, refused to play this game. Mr. Eipgam would buy cheap (but perfectly functional) trainers, for his kids, on e-bay. Nevertheless, Mr. Eipgam's kids were not happy. Mr. Eipgam had to put up with being called a fat Cockney, and other charming expressions which his kids had learnt at school, for being prudent about money.

 

Then one day, the banks started to call back their loans. The Pompey family had to go into administration, and became a humiliated charity case, living off scraps. They had to sell everything. And so did all the other famillies. The Eipgam kids were very proud - they were the only kids at school, who had footwear.

Edited July 16, 2011 by Nick-Kielce-Poland

[Ollie Burtons Grandad 0]

, the reason footballers wages are so high is because of the demand,.

Demand means what people are prepared to pay. And Newcastle United aren't prepared to pay, over a certain level, for footballers. And I am proud of them for this.

 

Let me tell you a story.

 

Once upon a time there was a street, with some houses. In each house, there lived a family. One of the family's was called the Eipgam family. One day, during a period of credit boom, all the family's except the Eipgam family, started becoming very extravagant. Not all the family's wanted to be extravagant, but with kids it can be difficult to withstand their nagging, when they see other kids with the most expensive trainers. And of course, what happened was the the most expensive trainers just got even more expensive.

 

ANother family, called the Pompey family, were among the most extravagant. My oh my how much they spent, and the amazing this is that they had rubbish taste, too. They would spend 100s of thousands of pounds on dross.

 

The Eipgam family, as mentioned, refused to play this game. Mr. Eipgam would buy cheap (but perfectly functional) trainers, for his kids, on e-bay. Nevertheless, Mr. Eipgam's kids were not happy. Mr. Eipgam had to put up with being called a fat Cockney, and other charming expressions which his kids had learnt at school, for being prudent about money.

 

Then one day, the banks started to call back their loans. The Pompey family had to go into administration, and became a humiliated charity case, living off scraps. They had to sell everything. And so did all the other famillies. The Eipgam kids were very proud - they were the only kids at school, who had footwear.

 

 

Story telling now eh? does that get you extra sweeties from the nurses then? The sooner they come along with your tablets the better for us all.

 

Just a thought but did you break into the Eipgams house and butcher them all as they slept before sexually abusing the corpses? I bet this how you got your lifetime invite to the Polish Loonie bin.

[StoneColdStephenIreland 74]

, the reason footballers wages are so high is because of the demand,.

Demand means what people are prepared to pay. And Newcastle United aren't prepared to pay, over a certain level, for footballers. And I am proud of them for this.

 

Let me tell you a story.

 

Once upon a time there was a street, with some houses. In each house, there lived a family. One of the family's was called the Eipgam family. One day, during a period of credit boom, all the family's except the Eipgam family, started becoming very extravagant. Not all the family's wanted to be extravagant, but with kids it can be difficult to withstand their nagging, when they see other kids with the most expensive trainers. And of course, what happened was the the most expensive trainers just got even more expensive.

 

ANother family, called the Pompey family, were among the most extravagant. My oh my how much they spent, and the amazing this is that they had rubbish taste, too. They would spend 100s of thousands of pounds on dross.

 

The Eipgam family, as mentioned, refused to play this game. Mr. Eipgam would buy cheap (but perfectly functional) trainers, for his kids, on e-bay. Nevertheless, Mr. Eipgam's kids were not happy. Mr. Eipgam had to put up with being called a fat Cockney, and other charming expressions which his kids had learnt at school, for being prudent about money.

 

Then one day, the banks started to call back their loans. The Pompey family had to go into administration, and became a humiliated charity case, living off scraps. They had to sell everything. And so did all the other famillies. The Eipgam kids were very proud - they were the only kids at school, who had footwear.

 

The other families didnt have to sell everything as they knew how to go about their business, and the Eipgam kids werent very proud apart from one little adopted kid who thought he was part of the family but pissed himself continuously and ate his own shyte for breakfast, lunch and tea.

[citizenerased 0]

Isn't he just diluting the shares so he can buy them back later?

If he was diluting the shares, who would suffer the most??? The majority shareholder, by any chance?

 

Yeah, because lord knows when Enron kept splitting their stock every 6 months it was the majority shareholders that suffered while the average joe was swimming in the money after it was all said and done.

[Dolly Potter MD 0]

As others have alluded to, almost all Shareportfolios within the companie are usually distributed within upper management-executive levels as part of an incentive based salary package. So it's pretty easy to see how the profits will be divided up.

 

If 600 quid is divided up three ways, with one bloke collecting 598 quid and one each to the other two suckers the average (strictly by the numbers, which doesn't take into account the disproportionate allocation of funds) will still to be 200 quid. Numbers have been twisted here, by the paper in the form of some lazy journalism, and in Polish Nick's case he's jumped all over like a jailhouse slut to simply shove his tongue up Ashley's arse again.

 

A clearer indicator of sportsdirect'/Ashley's regard for the staff at the grass roots level is the fact that sportsdirect.com (and Ashley's umbrella of sports clothing companies) is the only major player in the industry (in Britain at the very least) that has refused to sign up to a treaty that forbids the manufacturing of such goods in country found to be exploiting child labour through so-called sweatshop practices.

Edited July 16, 2011 by Year Zero

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

If 600 quid is divided up three ways, with one bloke collecting 598 quid and one each to the other two suckers the average (strictly by the numbers, which doesn't take into account the disproportionate allocation of funds) will still to be 200 quid. Numbers have been twisted here, by the paper in the form of some lazy journalism, and in Polish Nick's case he's jumped all over like a jailhouse slut to simply shove his tongue up Ashley's arse again.

 

A clearer indicator of sportsdirect'/Ashley's regard for the staff at the grass roots level is the fact that sportsdirect.com (and Ashley's umbrella of sports clothing companies) is the only major player in the industry that has refused to sign up to a treaty forbidding the manufacturing of such goods in country found to be exploiting child labour through so-called sweatshop practices.

Here we go again - in that 'sensational' documenatry, there were no instances of child labour.

 

Freddie Shepherd boasted of paying 5 pounds to have 40 pound shirts made.

[Ollie Burtons Grandad 0]

If 600 quid is divided up three ways, with one bloke collecting 598 quid and one each to the other two suckers the average (strictly by the numbers, which doesn't take into account the disproportionate allocation of funds) will still to be 200 quid. Numbers have been twisted here, by the paper in the form of some lazy journalism, and in Polish Nick's case he's jumped all over like a jailhouse slut to simply shove his tongue up Ashley's arse again.

 

A clearer indicator of sportsdirect'/Ashley's regard for the staff at the grass roots level is the fact that sportsdirect.com (and Ashley's umbrella of sports clothing companies) is the only major player in the industry that has refused to sign up to a treaty forbidding the manufacturing of such goods in country found to be exploiting child labour through so-called sweatshop practices.

Here we go again - in that 'sensational' documenatry, there were no instances of child labour.

 

Freddie Shepherd boasted of paying 5 pounds to have 40 pound shirts made.

 

Points to reflect on Nick

 

1) This will not get you parole

 

2) By refusing to sign up to the banning of child exploitation Ashley has sent a clear signal that he is happy to use whatever methods needed to get him a bigger profit. So much for a "Fit and Proper" person running our Club.

 

3) Mentioning Freddie Sheppard will get you an extra 500 volts and the velcro loony suit

 

4) You still are criminally insane

[Dolly Potter MD 0]

If 600 quid is divided up three ways, with one bloke collecting 598 quid and one each to the other two suckers the average (strictly by the numbers, which doesn't take into account the disproportionate allocation of funds) will still to be 200 quid. Numbers have been twisted here, by the paper in the form of some lazy journalism, and in Polish Nick's case he's jumped all over like a jailhouse slut to simply shove his tongue up Ashley's arse again.

 

A clearer indicator of sportsdirect'/Ashley's regard for the staff at the grass roots level is the fact that sportsdirect.com (and Ashley's umbrella of sports clothing companies) is the only major player in the industry that has refused to sign up to a treaty forbidding the manufacturing of such goods in country found to be exploiting child labour through so-called sweatshop practices.

Here we go again - in that 'sensational' documenatry, there were no instances of child labour.

 

Freddie Shepherd boasted of paying 5 pounds to have 40 pound shirts made.

The difference being that Shepherd and co, aren't in the manufacturing level in that game, and you're painting a key player (with clout when it comes to trade practice ethics) in the industry to be some sort of patron saint, or some kind of friend to the working class.

 

Shepherd/the club simply sign up to a shirt deal, to them (or any club) it's another revenue stream sign, sealed & delivered. The ethics of some clothing manufacturing companies is secondary, same as it is for the likes Kenyon when he was no doubt tallying up all those profit margins upon release of all those alternate Man Utd kits year after year. At least the likes of Shepherd, Fletcher & Kenyon (despite those profit margins) went about the task of building an on-field football brand to be proud of, for the shirt & ST/ticket buying working class that is.

 

You do know that Ashley/his companies deal with middle-men, or intermediatories, in these particular countries. They're no doubt very good at concealing evidence, or masking their true operation by setting up diversions for would-be investigators with their hidden cameras. It took years (via chance infiltration) to finally uncover China's dog & cat butcheries, and practices these zip-eyed arseholes use. That's despite all the dog-eating puns that went hand-in-hand with these 'animals' culture, such was their efficiency at hiding their operation. Pull your head out of the sand.

[Irrelevant Nick KP 0]

The difference being that Shepherd and co, aren't in the manufacturing level in that game, and you're painting a key player (with clout when it comes to trade practice ethics) in the industry to be some sort of patron saint, or some kind of friend to the working class.

 

Shepherd/the club simply sign up to a shirt deal, to them (or any club) it's another revenue stream sign, sealed & delivered. The ethics of some clothing manufacturing companies is secondary, same as it is for the likes Kenyon when he was no doubt tallying up all those profit margins upon release of all those alternate Man Utd kits year after year. At least the likes of Shepherd, Fletcher & Kenyon (despite those profit margins) went about the task of building an on-field football brand to be proud of, for the shirt & ST/ticket buying working class that is.

.

Basically the difference was the Shepherd sold shirts through a football club and Ashley through a sports shop.

On other words, zero difference, as any fool can see.

 

What's more Shepherd was a hopeless runner of the club, who got us into debt, and wasted a total of 37 million on Michael Owen, in fee and wages.

Edited July 16, 2011 by Nick-Kielce-Poland

[Monkeys Fist 38532]

The difference being that Shepherd and co, aren't in the manufacturing level in that game, and you're painting a key player (with clout when it comes to trade practice ethics) in the industry to be some sort of patron saint, or some kind of friend to the working class.

 

Shepherd/the club simply sign up to a shirt deal, to them (or any club) it's another revenue stream sign, sealed & delivered. The ethics of some clothing manufacturing companies is secondary, same as it is for the likes Kenyon when he was no doubt tallying up all those profit margins upon release of all those alternate Man Utd kits year after year. At least the likes of Shepherd, Fletcher & Kenyon (despite those profit margins) went about the task of building an on-field football brand to be proud of, for the shirt & ST/ticket buying working class that is.

.

Basically the difference was the Shepherd sold shirts through a football club and Ashley through a sports shop.

On other words, zero difference, as any fool can see.

 

What's more Shepherd was a hopeless runner of the club, who got us into debt, and wasted a total of 37 million on Michael Owen, in fee and wages.

Self awareness Nick, good trait.

[jab 0]

, the reason footballers wages are so high is because of the demand,.

Demand means what people are prepared to pay. And Newcastle United aren't prepared to pay, over a certain level, for footballers. And I am proud of them for this.

 

Let me tell you a story.

 

Once upon a time there was a street, with some houses. In each house, there lived a family. One of the family's was called the Eipgam family. One day, during a period of credit boom, all the family's except the Eipgam family, started becoming very extravagant. Not all the family's wanted to be extravagant, but with kids it can be difficult to withstand their nagging, when they see other kids with the most expensive trainers. And of course, what happened was the the most expensive trainers just got even more expensive.

 

ANother family, called the Pompey family, were among the most extravagant. My oh my how much they spent, and the amazing this is that they had rubbish taste, too. They would spend 100s of thousands of pounds on dross.

 

The Eipgam family, as mentioned, refused to play this game. Mr. Eipgam would buy cheap (but perfectly functional) trainers, for his kids, on e-bay. Nevertheless, Mr. Eipgam's kids were not happy. Mr. Eipgam had to put up with being called a fat Cockney, and other charming expressions which his kids had learnt at school, for being prudent about money.

 

Then one day, the banks started to call back their loans. The Pompey family had to go into administration, and became a humiliated charity case, living off scraps. They had to sell everything. And so did all the other famillies. The Eipgam kids were very proud - they were the only kids at school, who had footwear.

 

 

Story telling now eh? does that get you extra sweeties from the nurses then? The sooner they come along with your tablets the better for us all.

 

Just a thought but did you break into the Eipgams house and butcher them all as they slept before sexually abusing the corpses? I bet this how you got your lifetime invite to the Polish Loonie bin.

 

 

i find your manner very offensive....does nobody monitor the threads and warn or ban such offensive material...........there really is no need for it......

[Monkeys Fist 38532]

They used to, until Nick butchered them in their sleep, taking his evil pleasure from their rapidly cooling corpse.

[LoveTheBobby 1]

i used to be into a bit of necrophilia . . until some rotten cunt split on us .

[Monkeys Fist 38532]

Get your coat …

[LoveTheBobby 1]

. . fuckin need it n'arl today

 

drownedrattastical

[Monkeys Fist 38532]

Tis a tad moist.

[Ollie Burtons Grandad 0]

They used to, until Nick butchered them in their sleep, taking his evil pleasure from their rapidly cooling corpse.