Gemmill 34166 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 They're unbelievable that club. He wants a 10 match ban AND a full psychological evaluation. And Liverpool want to shut the fuck up about their "disappointment and shock" . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 1 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 He's clearly mentally unbalanced. The footage of him tussling with Ivanovic then turning to bite him is like something out of s horror film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12447 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 They're unbelievable that club. He wants a 10 match ban AND a full psychological evaluation. And Liverpool want to shut the fuck up about their "disappointment and shock" . He's done it before in all, first time was 7 matches so surely it had to be more as he obviously didn't learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 14525 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Shouldve been a red so thats 3, + the 7 he got for the same thing in Holland. The written statement will make interesting reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMoog 0 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Same old scousers with their victim complex, boo-fucking-hoo... 10 games is adequate, going by the fact that he has done it before and didn't learn from a previous ban if nothing else. Of course the joke of a club and it's piss poor fans will be up in arms about the whole situation, scummy, classless wanks, the lot of em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I think the very point of long term bans are to deter players from acting like twats again, and perhaps so they can learn from their mistakes. He was already banned for doing this earlier in his career for 7 games, clearly it didn't have enough of an impact on him. 10 is the least he should get given the fact Barton got 12. Wonder what Pacinofanny makes of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2188 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I think the very point of long term bans are to deter players from acting like twats again, and perhaps so they can learn from their mistakes. He was already banned for doing this earlier in his career for 7 games, clearly it didn't have enough of an impact on him. 10 is the least he should get given the fact Barton got 12. Wonder what Pacinofanny makes of it? Dead right, Stevie. He's got previous so the ban has to be longer. He's lucky they didn't double the previous punishment, he obviously has a problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essembeeofsunderland 811 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 (edited) Red card would give him 3 games.He got a 7 game ban for biting when in Ajax.I'd give him at least 1 more for not learning by his earlier mistake.I make that a minimum 11 game ban. Edited April 25, 2013 by essembeeofsunderland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26162 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Make him play next season wearing a Hannibal Lecter mask. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 38544 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Make him play next season wearing a Hannibal Lecter mask. Or just punch his fucking teeth out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essembeeofsunderland 811 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Or make him get all his nashers extracted, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 3960 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Read a link to that RAWK shite where somone complained he'd been there for a year and a half and had been suspended "for half of it" - that's because he's a cunt you scouse moron. They seem intent on undoing a lot of the good PR they got over the Hillsborough inqury by playing right up to the victim cliche again. As someone else said the way they talk of themselves as a "special" club is fucking hilarious. Your attempted subversion of the verdict by mealy-mouthed apologies failed - get the fuck over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 There's fuck all special about them. We were far bigger than them before Shankly went there, Liverpool came the club they are because of continuity, no other reason. If we had their last 50 years, and they had ours, we'd be like Man Utd and they'd be like Birmingham City. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 26602 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 There's fuck all special about them. We were far bigger than them before Shankly went there, Liverpool came the club they are because of continuity, no other reason. If we had their last 50 years, and they had ours, we'd be like Man Utd and they'd be like Birmingham City. Twenty years of success in the time of colour tv and MOTD/ITV have cemented their place in the elite for the a generation and they keep a high profile by a growing media who need them and the likes of Man U to feed on for their own interests. We became/stayed amateur in the 50's and 60's and it's fucked us long term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Twenty years of success in the time of colour tv and MOTD/ITV have cemented their place in the elite for the a generation and they keep a high profile by a growing media who need them and the likes of Man U to feed on for their own interests. We became/stayed amateur in the 50's and 60's and it's fucked us long term. It's a shame because we were more successful and far better supported than both up to the point of the Munich Air Disaster. We had half a chance to make up some lost ground in the mid 90's and ironically their greatest ever player single handedly fucked it up for us after the good work Keegan had done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essembeeofsunderland 811 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 They did have the best british manager ever.How Bob Paisley never got a knighthood i don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 26602 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I heard some southern Tim-nice-but-dim type going on about their only being three big clubs in this country, Man U, Liverpool and Arsenal the other day as though Arsenal had always been this massive trophy laden club. When I was a kid Spurs were, (and still are) regarded as one of the giants of the game despite only winning half the titles we have. Sounds daft I know but Thames and Granada used to run the football on ITV and surprise surprise they concentrated on the North West and London the regions they covered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I heard some southern Tim-nice-but-dim type going on about their only being three big clubs in this country, Man U, Liverpool and Arsenal the other day as though Arsenal had always been this massive trophy laden club. When I was a kid Spurs were, (and still are) regarded as one of the giants of the game despite only winning half the titles we have. Sounds daft I know but Thames and Granada used to run the football on ITV and surprise surprise they concentrated on the North West and London the regions they covered. This just screams Elton Welsby to me. Good points though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 26602 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 This just screams Elton Welsby to me. Good points though. The good old days of hardly ever being on the tv. Think I've mentioned this before but ITV made an appeal to the football league that they could switch a Spurs game to a sunday and televise that instead of the NUFC v West Ham they'd already agreed to screen. It was to be be our only live game that season and they wanted to renege on the game which would've lead us to miss out on the tv fee. The football league told ITV tough shit so they were forced to put us on. We ended up hammering them 4-0 as you probably already know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essembeeofsunderland 811 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Did he say `United'.If ever i'm talking to a `United' fan,when he first mentions `United' i always say `Aye .Leeds had a good team under Revie'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34166 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Whoa, you zinged them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 From RAWK I don't like these gobshites at the best of times but, after reading some of their 'opinions' on Luis Suarez these last couple of days. I hope we smash these all over. Sturridge hat trick would be nice. Most of us don't like them at any time, and the general view on Suarez is no different to any other group of supporters. How any could defend him even if he got a 20 game ban is beyond me. Barring a minority of them, they are absolute twats. They have always had a simmering resentment towards us, wishing they were us and had our success but, the sale of Andy Carroll to us and us hiring King Kenny again seemed to of well and truly tipped a lot of them over the edge when it comes to us. I've seen it all on their forums over the last couple of years bindippers, scouse vermin, thieving scouse twat's, victimpool, self pity city etc...It's like wandering onto manc forums at times. Wishing they were us Aye how we spend our lives wishing we were the most despised club on this island, with the most ridiculed classless population on these islands. Truly you couldn't make these arseholes up, you couldn't. Where do they get their arrogance from. They're perhaps like gypsies, everyone else thinks they're tramps, but they're too thick and backward to notice or care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pacinofan 0 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 There's fuck all special about them. We were far bigger than them before Shankly went there, Liverpool came the club they are because of continuity, no other reason. If we had their last 50 years, and they had ours, we'd be like Man Utd and they'd be like Birmingham City. There's fuck all special about them. We were far bigger than them before Shankly went there, Liverpool came the club they are because of continuity, no other reason. If we had their last 50 years, and they had ours, we'd be like Man Utd and they'd be like Birmingham City. If's and' and but's. Ridiculous thinking as ALL clubs could use them for any amount of reasoning. You weren't FAR bigger at all, or even bigger, you were a great cup team who yo yo' ed in and out of the 1st and 2nd division, but your delusions of grandeur do no harm so fill your boots. Just don't expect fans of other clubs to agree with you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 6432 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McFaul 35 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 (edited) If's and' and but's. Ridiculous thinking as ALL clubs could use them for any amount of reasoning. You weren't FAR bigger at all, or even bigger, you were a great cup team who yo yo' ed in and out of the 1st and 2nd division, but your delusions of grandeur do no harm so fill your boots. Just don't expect fans of other clubs to agree with you. 1958 Newcastle United major honours 10 Manchester United major honours 7 Liverpool major honours 5 (FIVE) 1958 Newcastle United highest average attendance to that point 56,989 (1948) Manchester United highest average attendance to that point 54,890 (1948) Liverpool highest average attendance to that point 45,783 (1950) 1958 Newcastle United best supported club in the country in - 11 seasons Manchester United best supported club in the country in - 2 seasons Liverpool best supported club in the country in the country - 1 season 1958 Newcastle United First Division Manchester United First Division Liverpool SECOND Division 1958 Top 4 Finishes Newcastle United 14 Manchester United 11 Liverpool 9 You were more like a Portsmouth than a Newcastle United you stupid scouse cunt. We dwarfed you, you're a product of good marketing, I repeat as if it needs repeating Newcastle United were a much more successful, historic, and far better supported club than Liverpool prior to 1958 over 66 years of history. I don't even understand how a wall pusher like yourself can even debate it. Edited April 25, 2013 by McFaul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now