Jump to content

Sports Direct FC


Holden McGroin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Can't see it happening in all honesty. Whereas I think the stadium thing was sadly predictable. It would certainly be a bridge too far for the vast majority of fans. You never know with these cunts though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen, I would suspect the lease on the ground is to Newcastle United (or NUFC Ltd or some such) can't see the council agreeing to continue the lease for what would be a totally new "entity"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen, I would suspect the lease on the ground is to Newcastle United (or NUFC Ltd or some such) can't see the council agreeing to continue the lease for what would be a totally new "entity"

 

The lease wouldn't be an issue.

 

I'm guessing they'd need approval from the FA though for a name change, which of course would never be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen, I would suspect the lease on the ground is to Newcastle United (or NUFC Ltd or some such) can't see the council agreeing to continue the lease for what would be a totally new "entity"

 

The lease wouldn't be an issue.

 

I'm guessing they'd need approval from the FA though for a name change, which of course would never be given.

 

I would guess the Council could/would make it an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen, I would suspect the lease on the ground is to Newcastle United (or NUFC Ltd or some such) can't see the council agreeing to continue the lease for what would be a totally new "entity"

 

The lease wouldn't be an issue.

 

I'm guessing they'd need approval from the FA though for a name change, which of course would never be given.

 

I would guess the Council could/would make it an issue.

 

The council could/would do fuck all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen, I would suspect the lease on the ground is to Newcastle United (or NUFC Ltd or some such) can't see the council agreeing to continue the lease for what would be a totally new "entity"

 

The lease wouldn't be an issue.

 

I'm guessing they'd need approval from the FA though for a name change, which of course would never be given.

 

I would guess the Council could/would make it an issue.

 

The council could/would do fuck all.

 

Explain please ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest CabayeAye

Didn't the FA change the rule about 'franchising' after the Wimbledon farce. I know he won't relocate, but I can't see the FA supporting "Sports Direct FC".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen, I would suspect the lease on the ground is to Newcastle United (or NUFC Ltd or some such) can't see the council agreeing to continue the lease for what would be a totally new "entity"

 

The lease wouldn't be an issue.

 

I'm guessing they'd need approval from the FA though for a name change, which of course would never be given.

 

I suspect the fans of Wimbledon thought the same before they got changed to MK Dons...

 

Sports Direct United? Newcastle Direct? Lonsdale FC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, bearing in mind Satan owns the following brands I guess any would be applicable if he wanted to 'showcase' their names as new club names:

 

Antigua

Carlton

Dunlop

Donnay

GoldDigga

Everlast

Kangol

Karrimor

Lonsdale

No Fear

Slazenger

Voodoo Dolls

 

Just add an 'FC' or 'Utd' at the end of any of them and he'd be cooking with gas :glare:

Edited by Armchair Pundit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest CabayeAye

Actually, bearing in mind Satan owns the foloow brands I guess any would be applicable if he wanted to 'showcase' their names as new club names:

 

Antigua

Carlton

Dunlop

Donnay

GoldDigga

Everlast

Kangol

Karrimor

Lonsdale

No Fear

Slazenger

Voodoo Dolls

 

Just add an 'FC' or 'Utd' at the end of any of them and he'd be cooking with gas :glare:

 

They are the shittest brands EVER!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen, I would suspect the lease on the ground is to Newcastle United (or NUFC Ltd or some such) can't see the council agreeing to continue the lease for what would be a totally new "entity"

 

The lease wouldn't be an issue.

 

I'm guessing they'd need approval from the FA though for a name change, which of course would never be given.

 

I suspect the fans of Wimbledon thought the same before they got changed to MK Dons...

 

Sports Direct United? Newcastle Direct? Lonsdale FC?

 

You're comparing us to Wimbledon? Even you must know that's a stupid comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Won't happen, I would suspect the lease on the ground is to Newcastle United (or NUFC Ltd or some such) can't see the council agreeing to continue the lease for what would be a totally new "entity"

 

The lease wouldn't be an issue.

 

I'm guessing they'd need approval from the FA though for a name change, which of course would never be given.

 

I suspect the fans of Wimbledon thought the same before they got changed to MK Dons...

 

Sports Direct United? Newcastle Direct? Lonsdale FC?

 

You're comparing us to Wimbledon? Even you must know that's a stupid comparison.

 

Well, I'd hope there was a difference but what if that's just pride talking, pride before a fall and all that - hell I wouldn't be at all surprised by anything these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.