Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Why Viduka? I'm really stumped on this one. Decent finisher but sulky and (if rumours are to be belived) lazy. Atleast Anelka has some pace about him. 5841[/snapback] Rumours are true Hoggy, heard it first hand from one of the Boro physios. Although as Jonny2J says he is supposed to be good with encouraging the young lads. But we're after a goal-hungry finisher, not a youth coach at the end of the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Hog 336 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 Why Viduka? I'm really stumped on this one. Decent finisher but sulky and (if rumours are to be belived) lazy. Atleast Anelka has some pace about him. 5841[/snapback] Rumours are true Hoggy, heard it first hand from one of the Boro physios. Although as Jonny2J says he is supposed to be good with encouraging the young lads. But we're after a goal-hungry finisher, not a youth coach at the end of the day. 5970[/snapback] Aye, remembered that one. Just couldn't remember who said it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8870 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 (edited) I think it gets funnier and funnier... - we replace Bellamy with a sulking French striker who fell out with his former employer after wanting to move and allegedly faked injury. - we replace an obese striker from Holland with a pot whale from Australia - we replace an honest pro in Hughes with an Australian Alcoholic - we replace an French left back who isn't commited until he gets a big new contract, with an lazy Nigerian who gets a big contract, but isn't committed Edited August 1, 2005 by Isegrim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Lazaru 0 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 I don't have a problem with Viduka's ability and he will get more goals per game than what we currently have if he's in the mood. The problem seems to be he's injury prone (so would fit in well!) and he tends to dissappear for parts of the season. But christ we need strikers and if we can shift the waste of space that is but and get a striker i'm all for it, though i want it to be in addition to Anelka and Boa Morte! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gejon 2 Posted August 1, 2005 Share Posted August 1, 2005 I think it gets funnier and funnier... - we replace Bellamy with a sulking French striker who fell out with his former employer after wanting to move and allegedly faked injury. - we replace an obese striker from Holland with a pot whale from Australia - we replace an honest pro in Hughes with an Australian Alcoholic - we replace an French left back who isn't commited until he gets a big new contract, with an lazy Nigerian who gets a big contract, but isn't committed 5989[/snapback] ahem 2nd post down... http://www.toontastic.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=279 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackies the Lad 0 Posted August 2, 2005 Share Posted August 2, 2005 I don't have a problem with Viduka's ability and he will get more goals per game than what we currently have if he's in the mood. The problem seems to be he's injury prone (so would fit in well!) and he tends to dissappear for parts of the season. But christ we need strikers and if we can shift the waste of space that is but and get a striker i'm all for it, though i want it to be in addition to Anelka and Boa Morte! 6186[/snapback] A recurring hamstring problem kept plaguing him, leaving him on the sidelines for long stretches of last season. He made only 21 appearances and scored 7 goals. Agreed, should fit in well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now