wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Wolfy, an un related question, but this is basically your mental thread of everything, so here goes: In playing the lottery, which combination of numbers is more likely to come up as the winning set of numbers: a: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 or b: 5, 17, 21, 35, 38 and 40. I look forward to your response. Equal chance of either coming up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17741 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I've seen no evidence at all that convinces me that anyone landed on the moon, none whatsoever. I know that. You don't believe in atoms and think the Earth is at the centre of the Universe so your opinion is not of much value to me. I'm more interested in other peoples opinions now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I know that. You don't believe in atoms and think the Earth is at the centre of the Universe so your opinion is not of much value to me. I'm more interested in other peoples opinions now. Ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 38708 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trophyshy 6432 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 (edited) Something about the size of what astronots wear. http://www.therebreathersite.nl/03_Historical/apollo_rebreathers.htm#update They're rebreathers. They scrub the CO2 and inject 02. Rebreathers have been used on Earth for up to 24 hours. A mate of mine has one, I have seen it and had a go on it so I know in my own mind for a fact that they exist. Edited August 17, 2012 by trophyshy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 The new movie. (3 honest men) This is the press conference a short while after these brave souls landed back on planet Earth. Now to spot a liar, you need to be experienced in spotting the tell tale signs which isn't always easy to do with good liars and Armstrong exhibits an air of total honesty and never looks under any duress, in-fact all 3 of them can't wait to tell the world their story of their moon venture, which is obviously normal as I would be busting a gut to tell mine if I was swanning about on the moon. In-fact I would be begging for questions. I'm going to name these men as thus. Neil ( honest) Armstrong. Buzz ( the truth) Aldrin. Michael ( cross my heart) Collins. :glare: :glare: :glare: :glare: :glare: :glare: :glare: full link: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 http://www.therebrea...hers.htm#update They're rebreathers. They scrub the CO2 and inject 02. Rebreathers have been used on Earth for up to 24 hours. A mate of mine has one, I have seen it and had a go on it so I know in my own mind for a fact that they exist. Ok. Do you know if they existed in 1969? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17741 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Ok. Do you know if they existed in 1969? They were a spin off from that mission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 They were a spin off from that mission. I'm more interested in other people's opinions now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17741 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 (edited) I'm more interested in other people's opinions now. I am happy to correct you still. Edited August 17, 2012 by Renton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I am happy to correct you still. Hahaha, that's ok, I was just kidding anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 3997 Posted August 17, 2012 Author Share Posted August 17, 2012 (edited) Renton. Re LRO who put it there? Also as Wolfy rightly says, photos should be shit hot not half arsed blurry things. Edited August 17, 2012 by Christmas Tree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17741 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 It's a NASA probe but if that invalidates it for you then so be it; I think the idea that the civilian scientists involved are part of a conspiracy is batshit crazy personally. Comparing it with Earth spy satellites isn't appropriate either (which btw are low Earth orbit and can't resolve number plates). It's designed to map the moon, not to look for Apollo. Clearly no evidence is good enough for some people. Also, if it's a hoax why didn't they just fake better photos?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 (edited) It's a NASA probe but if that invalidates it for you then so be it; I think the idea that the civilian scientists involved are part of a conspiracy is batshit crazy personally. Comparing it with Earth spy satellites isn't appropriate either (which btw are low Earth orbit and can't resolve number plates). It's designed to map the moon, not to look for Apollo. Clearly no evidence is good enough for some people. Also, if it's a hoax why didn't they just fake better photos?! So what you're saying is, N.A.S.A sent a probe to the moon with a dodgy camera because it's simply just a probe?Is this what you are saying? Oh and as for them faking better photo's, if they done that , the hoax would be clear for all to see as they would have to set the stage as it was in the landing pictures everyone has seen, which would require Stanley Kubrick to be resurrected to emulate what he done all those years ago. Edited August 17, 2012 by wolfy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17741 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 So what you're saying is, N.A.S.A sent a probe to the moon with a dodgy camera because it's simply just a probe? Is this what you are saying? Oh and as for them faking better photo's, if they done that , the hoax would be clear for all to see as they would have to set the stage as it was in the landing pictures everyone has seen, which would require Stanley Kubrick to be resurrected to emulate what he done all those years ago. Kubrick's in on it! Afaik the LRO is scanning the entire moon; it's got the appropriate resolution to do this; it's not there to persuade the likes of you what happened 40 years ago. I'd say picking up footprints is a canny resolution anyway. Wolfy, do you chuckle to yourself when the weather forecast comes on at the end of Look North? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Kubrick's in on it! Afaik the LRO is scanning the entire moon; it's got the appropriate resolution to do this; it's not there to persuade the likes of you what happened 40 years ago. I'd say picking up footprints is a canny resolution anyway. Wolfy, do you chuckle to yourself when the weather forecast comes on at the end of Look North? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17741 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 No. You don't feel some humour in the fact YOU KNOW those weathermen are 'in on it' with their fake satellite videos? Ok then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 You don't feel some humour in the fact YOU KNOW those weathermen are 'in on it' with their fake satellite videos? Ok then. What fake satellite videos. Most of it is just just maps with little sheep clouds. You don't think they're real do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17741 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Since they're canny predictive of the weather, yes I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 _54025666_chriscardwell.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3193 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Jesus man there are some nutcases on here. Also the people trying to argue with them why? You're telling a paranoid schizophrenic there are no voices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolfy 12 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Jesus man there are some nutcases on here. Also the people trying to argue with them why? You're telling a paranoid schizophrenic there are no voices. Probably the same reason you have been doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lake Bells tits 1 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 Whos the sheep, those who question when in doubt or those who blindingly believe what the government feeds them? Read up on the history of CIA to see what they are truly capable of. Beggars belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleeToonFan 1 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 And those things they're capable of have come out into the public eye? But THE biggest hoax has been kept quiet by thousands upon thousands? It is cool to deny though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now