Jump to content

Europe --- In or Out


Christmas Tree
 Share

Europe?  

92 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, zerosum said:

 

So you have delved into the specifics of possible new business around the globe that could be discovered over the next 10 years if we left the EU?

 

What I was saying is, yeah it will be tough.. and maybe never the same. But it's not the end like many try to make us think.

30% of our GDP is based on exports. When we leave without a trade deal that causes massive problems for those exports. The idea that we can do better deals by ourselves than as part of a massive trading bloc is a nonsense. We will recover over time but probably not to the level we were at. Economically speaking there is no upside to Brexit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, zerosum said:

 

So you have delved into the specifics of possible new business around the globe that could be discovered over the next 10 years if we left the EU?

 

What I was saying is, yeah it will be tough.. and maybe never the same. But it's not the end like many try to make us think.

 

Well, all that information is out there, if you believe qualified experts (specifically the civil service, economists, and academics). An FTA with the US might boost trade 0.3% of GDP if we accept reduced standards. We will lose more than 20 times that though by leaving the single market. And in the NE, where we have an EU surplus, we could lose 18% of GDP,  more than fifty times the increased trade with the US. 

 

These figures are not disputed apart from by Patrick Minford, who is essentially insane. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, zerosum said:

So you haven't delved into it.

No but I've asked the question of several Brexiters and not received an answer. There is no evidence of a wealth of trade deals possible that would boost our economy from where it is.

I can't prove the impossible. Surely this is something you should have thought about before the vote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, zerosum said:

It's not ideal I agree.

It's unprecedented, we are literally giving ourselves huge sanctions. 

 

The beauty of the single market is it essentially acts as an extended domestic market. It's unique and rightly envied worldwide. We're basically saying screw this, let's reduce our market by a factor of five. 

 

This is bad enough. But then think about the political damage and the very likely effect it will have splitting the union. The democratic deficit of NI and Scotland being forced out against their will. It doesn't make any sense on any level. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, zerosum said:

So you haven't delved into it.

 

Neither have you though. And you're the ones who really need to be proving that this is going to work, tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read most the reports. It just requires a bit of technical knowledge. They are very concerning, especially for this part of the UK. And for the NHS. There's been no plausible counter. No upside. None whatsoever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

This effectively means what? Weakens May's hand I guess in her 'My deal or No Deal' gambit.

Weakens her powers to spend money on no deal. Obviously it’d be reversed in the event of no deal but it’s a shot across the bows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Alex said:

My biggest gripe with politics in this country though generally is probably the FPTP system which seems increasingly outdated and means most general elections are decided by those bastard floating voters ;) in the more marginal seats in the midlands (I think that’s the usual trend anyway). When you analyse it, it’s not remotely democratic but because it’s worked in the past and because it continues to suit the two main parties it prevails. 

On the other hand, don't go for proportional representation, because it delivers a much worse outcome, with fascists, homophobes, and religious and other general nut jobs holding the balance of power. See Australia for (too) many examples

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RobinRobin said:

On the other hand, don't go for proportional representation, because it delivers a much worse outcome, with fascists, homophobes, and religious and other general nut jobs holding the balance of power. See Australia for (too) many examples

Sounds like the DUP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.