Alex 30260 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Some religious shit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34196 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 What's all this about the dead rising if she wins? Is Trump a necromancer?He reckons there's a load of dead people registered to vote and they're all gonna vote for Clinton. Basically getting his excuses in early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 19750 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 While others are just threatening to kill her. apparently that is what it takes to be patriotic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30260 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Yee-haa! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26192 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 How did she keep them from Congress? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Why would you choose between Hillary and Trump when you have blokes like this running?: He's the logical next stop for Republicans were it not for him admitting to his homosexuality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 [tweet] [/tweet] She's already revolting tbf. #TheDonald Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26192 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 What's all this about the dead rising if she wins? Is Trump a necromancer? He has the best zombies. The dead voting thing has been a Republican trope since at least Bill Clinton I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 How did she keep them from Congress? You mean as opposed to her campaign team? Or the the mechanics of it? Mails were provided to State who passed a subset on to Congress. You can read the full mail string here... https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12539 So publicly they were pushing the line that ALL 55k mails had been disclosed, privately they knew that not even 500 were ever going to reach congress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12450 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Jill Stein is a complete fucking crank in all btw, that may be right what she quoted but she's still bonkers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26192 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 So she has handed over 55,000 emails to the State Department. When was she required to hand over the 55,000 to Congress or when did she claim to have done so? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26192 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Sorry, I've just read the link. So someone wrote a draft release stating that State had turned over all emails to the committee and then someone else corrected him? That's the scandal here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17634 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Honestly, considering the extreme scrutiny Hilary Clinton has been under for so long I find it quite reassuring there's been no real dirt uncovered on her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 4949 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Honestly, considering the extreme scrutiny Hilary Clinton has been under for so long I find it quite reassuring there's been no real dirt uncovered on her. What would you consider to be 'worrying dirt', out of interest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26192 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 How about something approaching intentional wrongdoing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17634 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 What would you consider to be 'worrying dirt', out of interest? Evidence of fraud, corruption, tax evasion, for example. Can you summarise in maybe 3 bullets why she's practically regarded as the Antichrist by some people, including this forum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 19750 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Honestly, considering the extreme scrutiny Hilary Clinton has been under for so long I find it quite reassuring there's been no real dirt uncovered on her. you've forgotten about her well-known plot to replace the regime of every country in the middle east and her plan to start a third world war with russia. duh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 19750 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 my mrs reckons it's because she's a woman, incidentally. i advised her to keep her opinions in her handbag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 Sorry, I've just read the link. So someone wrote a draft release stating that State had turned over all emails to the committee and then someone else corrected him? That's the scandal here?Think it's more that her campaign wanted to publicly tout the line that they wanted all 55k handed over having got an agreement that less than 1% of that number ever would be. Correcting the mistake would have been to state that only the small number of mails that they perceived to be related to the investigation were handed over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 I think the fruit loops accusing Clinton of murder and that have done her a favor. when the actual mundane (but newsworthy) revelations come out people are underwhelmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12450 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 you've forgotten about her well-known plot to replace the regime of every country in the middle east and her plan to start a third world war with russia. duh And this one: "The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure. We’ve seen this first hand in the WikiLeaks documents, in which Hillary Clinton meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty in order to enrich these global financial powers, her special interest friends and her donors…" From Trump last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 4949 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Evidence of fraud, corruption, tax evasion, for example. Can you summarise in maybe 3 bullets why she's practically regarded as the Antichrist by some people, including this forum? I don't see her as the antichrist (who does?) I see her as a liar and standard bearer of the establishment. They may not be big issues to you, but they are to me. For the things you've mentioned, I've googled a bit to see if I can help you out with why other people take issue with her: Her bid to prevent her emails from causing her problems by pressuring the FBI certainly doesn't look good. The mass deletions of emails, coupled with the fact that the FBI found she and her associated had been deleting classified emails and claiming they were personal and therefore not of interest, is problematic. The FBI didn't charge her for that in the end, but called her extremely careless, and set out that no reasonable person could have been ignorant of what she was doing. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/17/hillary-clinton-accused-of-collusion-and-corruption-over-secret/ This article in the Economist on the Clinton Foundation is also worth a look - it sounds problematic at best: http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2016/02/economist-explains-4 Put it this way, if she was David Cameron, and he had the kind of financial infrastructure and corporate lobbying bods around him, we'd be crying foul all over the place. Not sure why Hillary gets a free pass. There are of course plenty of crazy theories as well, but these two seem to have some credence. She's certainly a member of the super rich elite, and one of the most powerful families in the the US. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12450 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 From a little while ago but still class: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now