Jump to content

Only in America


The Fish
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, ohhh_yeah said:

 

    :ohmy:

 

 

 

4 hours ago, ewerk said:

Shit, I thought the bridge collapsed some time after being hit and had been closed but clearly not.

 

 

Fucking hell!

 

Those kinds of bridges are designed to be under tension, they’ll be able to withstand a small fault in certain struts, but if the main support is taken out, as it is here, that’s it. 
 

As well as the loss of lives, and what a horrific way to go, this will cost billions, as it’s going to be blocking the port by the looks of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Monkeys Fist said:

this will cost billions, as it’s going to be blocking the port by the looks of it. 

 

Frank Sobotka is not going to be happy.

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a massive ship to squeeze under the bridge btw. I'm surprised a collision with one support can bring the entire structure down and that's it's taken so long for it to happen 

 

Edit - 

 

Turns out some other bridges have safeguards against this happening 

 

IMG_0358.thumb.jpeg.45ab70bf2d15d5c6812dcf1f70db7867.jpeg

Edited by Kid Dynamite
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Kid Dynamite said:

That's a massive ship to squeeze under the bridge btw. I'm surprised a collision with one support can bring the entire structure down and that's it's taken so long for it to happen 

 

Edit - 

 

Turns out some other bridges have safeguards against this happening 

 

IMG_0358.thumb.jpeg.45ab70bf2d15d5c6812dcf1f70db7867.jpeg

Yeah, I thought it was odd that it didn’t have those (which was mentioned when the accident was first reported). Even the Gateshead Millennium Bridge has them. Them was some minor controversy about if spoiling the aesthetics at the time, as some people deemed it overkill. When you consider it was deemed necessary there, you’d think it would be in place for a bridge carrying traffic over such a busy waterway / port of that size. Probably missed out the original design and thought too expensive to put right in the age of massive container ships. Fucking mental in retrospect 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can’t remember where I saw it, but I definitely recall reading an article about the treacherous state of bridges in the US. 

It essentially said “ soon, one or more of them will collapse”. 
It may been around the time that bridge in Italy had a lie down. 
 

I used to do a lot of contract work for a firm whose business was the installation, and subsequent monitoring, of movement meters on road and rail bridges and other structures. 
One job we had in Dewsbury, they brought over a team of rope lads from a partner business they had in the US, to work with us and see how things were done here. 
It was a small, single span rail bridge over a canal

IMG_2884.thumb.jpeg.f792a30e5cf82a1a7b83845d0b04ef66.jpeg

These lads were amazed that something so small and insignificant was

1- Metered in the first place

2- Those meters were maintained. 
Said that would rarely happen back home. 
 

It was a railway bridge, with regular passenger trains going over it ffs :lol:

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Monkeys Fist said:

I can’t remember where I saw it, but I definitely recall reading an article about the treacherous state of bridges in the US. 

It essentially said “ soon, one or more of them will collapse”. 
It may been around the time that bridge in Italy had a lie down. 
 

I used to do a lot of contract work for a firm whose business was the installation, and subsequent monitoring, of movement meters on road and rail bridges and other structures. 
One job we had in Dewsbury, they brought over a team of rope lads from a partner business they had in the US, to work with us and see how things were done here. 
It was a small, single span rail bridge over a canal

IMG_2884.thumb.jpeg.f792a30e5cf82a1a7b83845d0b04ef66.jpeg

These lads were amazed that something so small and insignificant was

1- Metered in the first place

2- Those meters were maintained. 
Said that would rarely happen back home. 
 

It was a railway bridge, with regular passenger trains going over it ffs :lol:

 

 

It goes further than large structures like bridges mate. If any of your family live in social housing, get shit boiler checked. The landlord should do it but fuck me what I saw in london would make a hooker blush

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.