Jump to content

Adam Johnson


Recommended Posts

No response to the claim they had access to ALL of the texts he sent her. Using terms like 'presumably' isn't much of a defence either

 

I hope the FA slam the cunts

I personally like the "Some documents were received relating to the case"

 

Not mentioning the fact that they knew he had at least kissed her in may - not even to deny the fact - then throwing vagueness like that out.

 

The clubs as guilty as he is man, bunch of paedo lovers the lot of them

Edited by ToonMarshy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 705
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

RTG seem mainly happy with the club.

Well most of them think what he did was acceptable anyway so that's no surprise. To be fair most of them have had sexual activity with their sisters/mothers/brothers/each other so what he's done is right up their street!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally like the "Some documents were received relating to the case"

 

Not mentioning the fact that they knew he had at least kissed her in may - not even to deny the fact - then throwing vagueness like that out.

 

The clubs as guilty as he is man, bunch of paedo lovers the lot of them

Yep.

 

Reading it again they've neglected to mention they read all his texts, knew he had groomed her, admitted to kissing her and said she 'felt' turned on. Their defence is basically 'but he said he was pleading not guilty'

 

And this is a statement they've had 2 weeks to prepare :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep.

 

Reading it again they've neglected to mention they read all his texts, knew he had groomed her, admitted to kissing her and said she 'felt' turned on. Their defence is basically 'but he said he was pleading not guilty'

 

And this is a statement they've had 2 weeks to prepare :lol:

Yup - They knew that he'd done it, they just didnt know he was gonna fess up.

Typical only sorry because you got caught scenario here.

 

Classy fuckers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure Johnson being cleared to play coincided with Advocaat taking over from Poyet. That's obviously just a massive coincidence though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep.

 

Reading it again they've neglected to mention they read all his texts, knew he had groomed her, admitted to kissing her and said she 'felt' turned on. Their defence is basically 'but he said he was pleading not guilty'

 

And this is a statement they've had 2 weeks to prepare :lol:

Mind, you can just imagine that fucker Gordon Taylor making a case for Johnson playing so as 'not to prejudice the case'. I agree with what you're saying though. It gives them a bit of an excuse (in terms of being seen to do the right thing, which in many cases - such as this - has fuck all to do with actually doing the right thing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites



 

So what happens to the girl who has lied under oath that she gave him a BJ?

 

 

#justiceforjohnson

 

 

They really are fucking morons aren't they? Him being found not guilty does not necessarily mean he is innocent and she is lying it just means the prosecution was unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt to the jury that he was guilty of that charge. They really need to pack in chatting shit about an area they are clearly completely uninformed on. I suppose they need to try and come up with something to try and 'win' on as the fact is they cheered on (and even made chants backing) a now guilty (and their club knew he was guilty of 2 charges) sex offender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.