Gemmill 34379 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Love asshat. Criminally underused in this country. I like assface too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonotl 2406 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I'm bringing it back. I'm a trend setter. Soon everyone will be changing careers like they will soon be changing their nationalities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 26745 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 "If you wanna be with us Gini there's a price to pay You're the genie in a Toon top Rubbing mackems the right way If you wanna be with us We can make your wish come true You can join the North East top dogs You're ganna like what we do (He's a Gini in a toon top baby Gotta play the right way honey He's a Gini in a toon top baby Come come, come on and let him out)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 3997 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 (edited) So without going all Deano, am I write thinking McClaren favours 433 and if so will the front 6 currently be..... Sissoko Tiote Wijnaldum Perez Cisse Aarons What about De Jong? Colback? Edited July 12, 2015 by Christmas Tree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGingerQuiff 2412 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Yes, 100% write. Aarons especially, first name McClaren will right on the team sheet. Given he's proven and that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34379 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 8985 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 So without going all Deano, am I write thinking McClaren favours 433 and if so will the front 6 currently be..... Sissoko Tiote Wijnaldum Perez Cisse Aarons What about De Jong? Colback? There needs to be a few more rows in your formation and a better understanding of the players position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 3997 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 There needs to be a few more rows in your formation and a better understanding of the players position. Why do I need more rows for two lines of 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 8985 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Why do I need more rows for two lines of 3 ... Because it won't be two flat lines of 3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 3997 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I'm talking about the front 6 in a 433 not their positional play, Dave! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 26745 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 So without going all Deano, am I write thinking McClaren favours 433 and if so will the front 6 currently be..... Sissoko Tiote Wijnaldum Perez Cisse Aarons What about De Jong? Colback? CT is like Worzel Gummidge. He's taken his political wum head off and changed it for his grammar wum head instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13834 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I want to see fluid attacking football where we don't even have a formation and it's just really fucking abstract. ''What's the formation you're playing today Mr.McClaren?'' ''We call this one, Apple Tree on Hill, Summertime'' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonotl 2406 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Yes, 100% write. Aarons especially, first name McClaren will right on the team sheet. Given he's proven and that. You. I like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonotl 2406 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I want to see fluid attacking football where we don't even have a formation and it's just really fucking abstract. ''What's the formation you're playing today Mr.McClaren?'' ''We call this one, Apple Tree on Hill, Summertime'' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 8985 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I'm talking about the front 6 in a 433 not their positional play, Dave! So you're questioning which positions players will take, but not their positions... Go dig a hole Radar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonotl 2406 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Go dig a hole Radar. What do you think he's doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 8985 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 What do you think he's doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 3997 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 (edited) So you're questioning which positions players will take, but not their positions... Go dig a hole Radar. Not at. McClaren favours 433 I was wondering who may fill the the front 6 positions. But you knew that Edited July 12, 2015 by Christmas Tree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 8985 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Not at. McClaren favours 433 I was wondering who may fill the the front 6 positions. But you knew that So you figured you'd shoehorn players out of position because...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 3997 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 So you figured you'd shoehorn players out of position because...? It's ok, go back to your grapes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toonotl 2406 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 8985 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 It's ok, go back to your grapes I'm going to make it simple. McClaren may favour a 4-3-3 but it's not a flat 4-3-3 is it? It's more a 4-1-2-2-1 which would make it easier for you to put the players in their proper positions. Happy to help you find how players will fit into their positions without talking about their positions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 3997 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I'm going to make it simple. McClaren may favour a 4-3-3 but it's not a flat 4-3-3 is it? It's more a 4-1-2-2-1 which would make it easier for you to put the players in their proper positions. Happy to help you find how players will fit into their positions without talking about their positions I asked which players 10 posts later and you still haven't named one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 8985 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 I asked which players 10 posts later and you still haven't named one. because you asked how they'd fit into a 4-3-3 and the answer is they won't. fuck me you're exhausting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 3997 Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 because you asked how they'd fit into a 4-3-3 and the answer is they won't. fuck me you're exhausting. I didn't ask that at all. I said McClaren favoured 433 and then listed 6 players . All you had to do was say, aye, no, take this one out etc etc You've made this harder than in need to be. (But like your wine) And still no players mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now