Jump to content

President Biden


Happy Face
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

U.S. Delegates Opposed an International Resolution That Supported Breastfeeding

By RENAE REINTS 

 

The United Nations-affiliated World Health Assembly in Geneva this spring became the scene of a surprising showdown, as the U.S. battled with other nations over a resolution supporting the use of breast milk, the New York Times reported Sunday.

The resolution said countries should limit the misleading marketing of breast milk substitutes, as a mother’s breast milk has been shown to be the healthiest for children in decades of research. The resolution was expected to pass easily, but U.S. delegates aimed to remove language that encouraged countries to “protect, promote and support breast-feeding” in an alleged alignment with baby formula manufacturers.

When this failed, the Times reported that U.S. delegates turned to threats. They reportedly told Ecuador, who planned to introduce the resolution, that if it didn’t drop the proposal, the U.S. would punish the nation with trade measures. The Ecuadorian delegates acquiesced, and health advocates struggled to find another sponsor for the resolution.

The Times says this scenario was verified by several other delegates present, many of whom requested anonymity for fear of retaliation from the U.S.

“What happened was tantamount to blackmail, with the U.S. holding the world hostage and trying to overturn nearly 40 years of consensus on best way to protect infant and young child health,” Patti Rundall, the policy director of the British advocacy group Baby Milk Action, told the Times.

In addition to the trade threats, an Ecuadorean government official told the Times the U.S. threatened to withdrawal military support from northern Ecuador, where violence from boarding Colombia causes ongoing issues.

“We were shocked because we didn’t understand how such a small matter like breast-feeding could provoke such a dramatic response,” said the Ecuadorean official, speaking with a requirement of anonymity.

The Russian delegation eventually stepped in to introduce the measure, with no push-back from the U.S.

“We’re not trying to be a hero here, but we feel that it is wrong when a big country tries to push around some very small countries, especially on an issue that is really important for the rest of the world,” a Russian delegate told the Times, saying the decision to support the resolution was a matter of principle.

The final resolution retained much of the original wording, despite American efforts. Just one portion, calling on the World Health Organization to provide support to member states seeking to halt “inappropriate promotion of foods for infants and young children,” was removed.

A 2016 study published by The Lancet says breastfeeding could save the lives of 823,000 children and 20,000 mothers each year. In addition, universal breastfeeding could save $300 billion in reduced health care costs and improved economic prospects for children.

The Times reported that the baby food market is a $70 billion industry.

 

http://fortune.com/2018/07/08/breastfeeding-resolution-us-opposition/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ohhh_yeah said:

The Russian delegation eventually stepped in to introduce the measure, with no push-back from the U.S.

“We’re not trying to be a hero here, but we feel that it is wrong when a big country tries to push around some very small countries, especially on an issue that is really important for the rest of the world,” a Russian delegate told the Times, saying the decision to support the resolution was a matter of principle.

 

Once again, Trump manages to make Putin look good :( 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Andrew said:

 

"Can everyone please look to the left for this one?"

"Is that your left or my left?"

*Yours*

"Which is my left?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a time to leave the EU.

 

If we had any sense we'd realise that we have shared values with Europe and not the USA (even without Trump), we'd stay in the EU, and we'd build and take charge of the EU army (alongside the French).

 

But no, we isolate ourselves at the worst possible time instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

First question from reporters: how do you get the taste of Putin's shit out of your mouth?

Why would I want to get the taste out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Andrew changed the title to President Biden

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.