Isegrim 8868 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8868 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13811 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 But what does is mean!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8868 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Tom said: But what does is mean!? اللعنة يعرف 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 13983 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, Tom said: But what does is mean!? وسيوقع ترانكيلو بارنيتا قبل يوم الجمعة 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8868 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 6 minutes ago, Meenzer said: وسيوقع ترانكيلو بارنيتا قبل يوم الجمعة توصي جو هارت بالرأس والكتفين للأيدي المشعرة 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 12736 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 Just another day in the perfectly normal takeover saga. These are all routine proceedings. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12447 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Ayatollah Hermione said: Just another day in the perfectly normal takeover saga. These are all routine proceedings. Yep, more clear, and concise information that the PL will use to make a swift decision when they bother to get to it in a year or so. Edited July 29, 2020 by Howay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26189 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Meenzer said: وسيوقع ترانكيلو بارنيتا قبل يوم الجمعة هذا التقرير واسع النطاق 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tdansmith 2068 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 2 hours ago, Meenzer said: وسيوقع ترانكيلو بارنيتا قبل يوم الجمعة 2 hours ago, Isegrim said: توصي جو هارت بالرأس والكتفين للأيدي المشعرة 1 hour ago, ewerk said: هذا التقرير واسع النطاق Well, that's easy for all of you to say 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8868 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 1 minute ago, Tdansmith said: Well, that's easy for all of you to say كيف حال لحم الخنزير المقدد ، قلت؟ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tdansmith 2068 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, Isegrim said: كيف حال لحم الخنزير المقدد ، قلت؟ yes, tuesday about 10.30am 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16498 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/bein-sports-make-reference-newcastle-18684822 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
247 597 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 ‘Mike Ashley will take a £17m deposit if the club is sold or not’ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8868 Posted July 29, 2020 Share Posted July 29, 2020 I actually don’t see how the appeal does affect the decision in any way. Taking the report in its present form it does not provide any basis to reject the takeover, meaning an appeal by KSA doesn’t change anything in this regard. It’s been indicated that the PL is unhappy with Al Qasabi being media minister as well as on the board of PIF, but I honestly can’t fathom why this is seen as a problem. He has been appointed into this position in February 2020. I haven’t seen anything indicating that he has been involved in anything regarding piracy before he assumed office. As the PIF is obviously linked to the state I don’t know why there is a problem having a minister as a board member. I might be rather thick, but surely if the PL wants to stop piracy in KSA then it should be best having the minister in some way responsible. I did also have another look at the WTO report and did notice that they did publish additional information, especially the arguments from both sides as well as from third parties. It’s telling that Qatar produced evidence in form of a statement from an (alleged) BeoutQ employee, exhibit-222, linking the running of the channel directly to the Saudi government. There were arguments from both sides about the timing when the evidence was submitted (on the last day) as well as about the request from Qatar for the need of special measures of confidentiality. The panel did allow the evidence to be submitted but didn’t draw any conclusion from it, meaning they didn’t deem the witness to be credible. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12447 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 I just keep coming back to the fact rejecting it on grounds of being worried about piracy resolves absolutely nothing, if anything it would make it worse. This is all an issue of the PL’s making, the rights shouldn’t be sold regionally like this, especially a region that is so divided. Without that fucking absurd way of selling the rights there’d be no piracy issue as Saudi Arabia would have their own rights. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 9172 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 6 hours ago, Tdansmith said: yes, tuesday about 10.30am الجمعة ، أليس كذلك؟ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tdansmith 2068 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 36 minutes ago, RobinRobin said: الجمعة ، أليس كذلك؟ I've give you a like, but I haven't got a clue what you and all those arab typing fellas are are about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl 175 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 Twitter rumours that the Premier League are no longer the hold up, its Ashley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 30246 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 (edited) I’m just speculating but it feels like the PL want to reject the bid to appease the clubs who don’t want us to have a benefactor with more money than them. But they don’t have the stones or the justification to do it. Pathetic if that’s the case Edited July 30, 2020 by Alex 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 6766 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 37 minutes ago, Carl said: Twitter rumours that the Premier League are no longer the hold up, its Ashley. Contracts are signed and exchanged he can’t hold it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16498 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 1 hour ago, Alex said: I’m just speculating but it feels like the PL want to reject the bid to appease the clubs who don’t want us there have a benefactor with more money than them. But they don’t have the stones or the justification to do it. Pathetic if that’s the case Yep They don't want us at the top table Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooper 940 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 A third of a year & we're still no nearer a decision, its pathetic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 4949 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 2 hours ago, Toonpack said: Contracts are signed and exchanged he can’t hold it up. He could if the exclusivity has lapsed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 26189 Posted July 30, 2020 Share Posted July 30, 2020 4 minutes ago, Rayvin said: He could if the exclusivity has lapsed. Go on then, explain how he could. Give it a go. I'm all fucking ears to hear this one. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now