Jump to content

£140m Losses for Chelsea


Gemmill
 Share

Recommended Posts

If they have got a plan for the club to become self-sufficient, it must be a very cunning one.  :lol:

85339[/snapback]

 

Of bond villain-esque proportions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm honestly at a complete loss as to why they bothered getting Peter Kenyon in. Obviously he's at the top of the tree in his profession but frankly Chelsea dont need him to manage the finances. It's Abramovich's hobby horse-$140 million is a drop in the proverbial for him.

 

It'll only ever become an issue if Abramovich gets bored, and in that case Kenyon (even with all the financial acumen on the planet) wont be able to do sweet fanny adams anyway. And he knows it.

85236[/snapback]

 

They wouldn't be getting in nowhere near as much turnover if Kenyon wasn't there tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.