Jump to content

Film/moving picture show you most recently watched


Jimbo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Went to visit a few mates last weekend. One couple brought their little laddy, who's been sick. Now the rest of the group are sick as dogs, throwing up and pissing out our bumholes. So I need a film to watch this afternoon as I have a little pity party on the sofa.

 

Any suggestions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last time I offered a movie recommendation to someone it was well received, so I'll offer the same suggestion now - Snatch.

 

Interpret that as the film or something else entirely, but whichever way you go it should be enjoyable. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Blade Runner 2049

 

Pretty average. 6.4/10

 

The original is still better. Got of bit tired of the over the top visuals and the lack of feeling it was actually a city of the future they were in and not a couple of sets. :lol:

Edited by Park Life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Blade Runner was really good.  The visuals were superb and that lass off War Dogs was worth the price of admission on her own.  I would say at this stage I prefer the original (for Rutger Hauer alone) but then again I didn't like it at all first time I saw it so on repeated viewings this has a real chance of surpassing it.

 

Wind River.  Jeremy Renner as a tracker who finds a dead native American girl raped and dead in the snow, and then helps the FBI track down her killer.  It's written and directed by the guy who wrote Sicario and Hell Or High Water and tbh I think I enjoyed it more than both of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 07/10/2017 at 5:39 PM, Christmas Tree said:

Lion - Faultless

 

Cried like a baby :(

 

Yeah, that was a good un. Much more deserving of the best film Oscar than moonlight, I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2017 at 4:35 AM, Park Life said:

Blade Runner 2049

 

Pretty average. 6.4/10

 

The original is still better. Got of bit tired of the over the top visuals and the lack of feeling it was actually a city of the future they were in and not a couple of sets. :lol:

 

I thought the new Blade Runner was really well done, while I agree with you that the first one was superior, I feel like my preference may be due to the age I was  when I saw it.  I thought the new one was a 9/10, it could have easily been a phone in for the studio but it was carefully put together to continue the story.  It asks many of the same questions  (what is it to be human? do robots have souls? ) but in different ways, I thought RG was really good in it as was HF.   Agree with David Kelly that it will continue to bear fruit on further viewing, planning on seeing it again.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, tooner said:

 

I thought the new Blade Runner was really well done, while I agree with you that the first one was superior, I feel like my preference may be due to the age I was  when I saw it.  I thought the new one was a 9/10, it could have easily been a phone in for the studio but it was carefully put together to continue the story.  It asks many of the same questions  (what is it to be human? do robots have souls? ) but in different ways, I thought RG was really good in it as was HF.   Agree with David Kelly that it will continue to bear fruit on further viewing, planning on seeing it again.    

 

When I was a boy I had an icke mickle lickle horse....Don't forget the resonance of that horse...Did I mention my toy horse?

Edited by Park Life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alex said:

After searching the internt for someone slating the new Blade Runner film you managed to find someone no one has heard of :razz:

 

best mates with sargon of akad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Tooj said:

Blade Runner 2049 is sensational, no idea what Parky is on about. 

Believe me I'm not happy I wasn't blown away by it. Probably been looking forward to it too much. Am going to see it again. Think the visuals were sensational but had problems with Gosling (always with the deadpan) and the bad pacing. I can see why it flopped in America but I also can't see where the 200 million budget went....:o

Edited by Park Life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.