Guest alex Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 He's a gash manager imo. FACTAZOID. 95280[/snapback] Gash ? 95285[/snapback] Safe for work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 He's a gash manager imo. FACTAZOID. 95280[/snapback] Gash ? 95285[/snapback] Safe for work? 95286[/snapback] Porn Roulette ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Would he be a success? Leazes? 95165[/snapback] Alex.......can't you decide for yourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Would he be a success? Leazes? 95165[/snapback] Alex.......can't you decide for yourself 95294[/snapback] Howay man Leazes, hit or miss? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Would he be a success? Leazes? 95165[/snapback] Alex.......can't you decide for yourself 95294[/snapback] Howay man Leazes, hit or miss? 95296[/snapback] howay man Alex, you decide for Freddie .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Would he be a success? Leazes? 95165[/snapback] Alex.......can't you decide for yourself 95294[/snapback] Howay man Leazes, hit or miss? 95296[/snapback] howay man Alex, you decide for Freddie .. 95298[/snapback] To be fair, he's never heard of the bloke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6302 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Would he be a success? Leazes? 95165[/snapback] Alex.......can't you decide for yourself 95294[/snapback] Howay man Leazes, hit or miss? 95296[/snapback] howay man Alex, you decide for Freddie .. 95298[/snapback] Simple yes or no will do! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishMag 0 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 (edited) First post so I'll probably be slaughtered. anyways... The Argument against is obviously his lack of selection stability as everyone is aware of. That and he speaks shiite But think about this, Chelsea now are mainly made up of players HE brought to the club. Cech - Arranged while he was in charge Terry - Could say he brought him through Gallas - Very good player Lampard - Has come into his own under José, but brought to the club by Ranieri Duff, Joe Cole, Makelele, Crespo, Gudjohnsen, Bridge (when he was on his game) were all Ranieri signings. Robbens transfer was also arranged while he was in charge. He gave Chelsea a 4th place and 2nd place finish, got to an FA Cup Final, reached the CL Semi Finals. What would we give for that right now! Just pointing at the positives before dismissing him too quickly as an option. I still want Hitzfeld or O'Neill though Edited February 16, 2006 by IrishMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6302 Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Cech and Robben were transfers arranged while Ranieri was in charge, but it's commonly accepted that Kenyon, and not Ranieri was repsponsible for them... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted February 15, 2006 Share Posted February 15, 2006 Robben especially, after his Man Utd transfer was scuppered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Cech and Robben were transfers arranged while Ranieri was in charge, but it's commonly accepted that Kenyon, and not Ranieri was repsponsible for them... 95415[/snapback] Source ? Hernan Crespo signed by Ranieri ? Joe Cole signed by Ranieri ? Frank Lampard signed by Ranieri ? John Terry brought into the Chelsea first team by Ranieri ? William Gallas signed by Ranieri ? Robert Huth signed by Ranieri ? Claude Makelele signed by Ranieri ? Eidur Gudjohnsen signed by Ranieri ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Source ? Hernan Crespo signed by Ranieri - YES Joe Cole signed by Ranieri - YES Frank Lampard signed by Ranieri YES John Terry brought into the Chelsea first team by Ranieri - NO William Gallas signed by Ranieri - YES Robert Huth signed by Ranieri - NO Claude Makelele signed by Ranieri - YES Eidur Gudjohnsen signed by Ranieri - NO He also set up the Drogba deal before he left... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Source ? Hernan Crespo signed by Ranieri - YES Joe Cole signed by Ranieri - YES Frank Lampard signed by Ranieri YES John Terry brought into the Chelsea first team by Ranieri - NO William Gallas signed by Ranieri - YES Robert Huth signed by Ranieri - NO Claude Makelele signed by Ranieri - YES Eidur Gudjohnsen signed by Ranieri - NO He also set up the Drogba deal before he left... 95440[/snapback] Can we agree that the Ranieri signings have been more successful than Mourinho's ? Not a bad judge of talent is he ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1117 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 He's just the sort of appointment I expect from the fat man tbh. Fred's record of appointing managers suggest he will go for someone who is the anti Souness. As such Ranieri is likeable to the fans and his teams play attractive football. Never mind that we could appoint someone who could move the club forward in the long term when we can look for a short term change eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishMag 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 I stand corrected over Terry (made his debut the season before Ranieri took over) However he did win Chelseas player of the year during Ranieri's first season. Also I was wrong about Gudjohnsen. Whether he would be good here I don't know, but you can't say that he didn't sign quality at Chelsea, at lot of whom are responsible for where they are now. Anyway its only him thats expressed interest, not the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 I'd be content with Ranieri. I can see him bring positive football and European qualification back to the club but nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Ranieri would be behind O'Neill, Hitzfeld and Roeder for my choice of manager, but I wouldn't be disapointed with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Author Share Posted February 16, 2006 Ranieri would be behind O'Neill, Hitzfeld and Roeder for my choice of manager, but I wouldn't be disapointed with him. 95550[/snapback] Ooh, the bandwagon is rolling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 www.roederforthetoon.com tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 9 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 Ranieri would be behind O'Neill, Hitzfeld and Roeder for my choice of manager, but I wouldn't be disapointed with him. 95550[/snapback] Ooh, the bandwagon is rolling 95554[/snapback] Not getting carried away yet. Afterall, Souness won 5 or 6 on the spin in his first few weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 If Roeder stays for the full twelve weeks and we continue to perform well then i'd put him in the running but behind the likes of Hitzfeld, O'Neill, Ranieri etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 fair enough - if we get into Yurop and a Cup Final spot it would be bloody silly not to consider Roeder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 9 Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 in the 2001-2 season when Houllier was ill, Phil Thompson took over for several months and they finished 2nd. Do you think he was ever considered for the top post just because he did a good job in a Caretaker role? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted February 16, 2006 Share Posted February 16, 2006 in the 2001-2 season when Houllier was ill, Phil Thompson took over for several months and they finished 2nd. Do you think he was ever considered for the top post just because he did a good job in a Caretaker role? 95601[/snapback] That's a fair point and I hope that Roeder isn't in the running even if we were to get into Europe and/or win the cup, unless we really have no one better to take the job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now