Leonard Jeffrey "Oz" Osborne Silent Mags v Barry Spencer Taylor Boring Bastard Wolves

[NJS 3954]

It was more of a pen than the similar one the scouse cunts got at Palace. 

[Howay 12447]

52 minutes ago, Andrew said:

I am astonished by how much I'm reading that wood either dived or wasn't fouled for our penalty, it's a stonewall penalty surely?

 

I know this isn't the least biased place to ask but I don't just have my nufc specs on do I? It's clear as day. 

 

I guess he was supposed to move out of Sa’s way  

Edited April 9, 2022 by Howay

[Gemmill 34151]

2 hours ago, Andrew said:

I am astonished by how much I'm reading that wood either dived or wasn't fouled for our penalty, it's a stonewall penalty surely?

 

I know this isn't the least biased place to ask but I don't just have my nufc specs on do I? It's clear as day. 

Honestly I thought it could have got overturned cos he knocks the ball ahead and then just seems to drag his foot over the keeper's leg. It was an unnatural movement, I thought. I don't care though but I was relieved when it was confirmed. 

[Gemmill 34151]

The morning after the night before. That tarte au citron hasn't sat right all night. 4:15 and I'm lying here dreaming of the first Gaviscon shot of the day. 

[NJS 3954]

1 hour ago, Gemmill said:

Honestly I thought it could have got overturned cos he knocks the ball ahead and then just seems to drag his foot over the keeper's leg. It was an unnatural movement, I thought. I don't care though but I was relieved when it was confirmed. 

It made me think of Nick Barmby doing that against us for Spurs when we drew 3-3 with them in the early PL years where he did that albeit more centrally and got Pav sent off with the rules at the time. My view was an honest/good player would have rode the keeper's challenge and just scored (Beardsley did that loads of times). I think last night's, the Liverpool one I mentioned and even Fraser's versus Man City all brought to mind that if the player had been more honest and jumped over the lunge, there's no way they would have scored which I had in mind could make a ref not give it. I can see why a player who knows the angle is against them would "take the hit" and appeal but I'm not sure it sits well with my idealism. 

[Andrew 4182]

Sa has given away that penalty three times this season though, its all on him, he rushes out and there is no way our coaching team haven't been drilling that into our forwards this last week.
 

If he doesn't rush, Woods touch is different, given where the foul happened he absolutely had the time and the angle to have a decent shot. If that was woods touch without Sa flying in then it would be absolutely laughable.

Anywhere else on the pitch and no one is batting an eyelid at that being a foul. Wood definitely does the "forgetting how to stand up" thing when contact is coming flying in but we all know full well you don't get the foul if you don't do that, it just ends up being a goal kick or a corner.

https://streamwo.com/v/29ynwp1n

As for idealism...

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=859988331348142

 

https://theathletic.com/3182586/2022/03/15/trying-to-explain-the-nonsensical-decision-not-to-award-newcastle-a-penalty-against-chelsea/

idgaf about idealism

[OTF 6127]

2 hours ago, Gemmill said:

Honestly I thought it could have got overturned cos he knocks the ball ahead and then just seems to drag his foot over the keeper's leg. It was an unnatural movement, I thought. I don't care though but I was relieved when it was confirmed. 

 

He's got an occassional gammy foot you disability shaming prick.

[ewerk 26118]

Wood bought the penalty and I’m very comfortable with that.

[Gemmill 34151]

I don't even know where to put this, but a bloke on the Pod on the Tyne twitter live thing from the other night just asked "Should we not be trying to find a place in the team SOMEHOW for Paul Dummett?!"

 

[Ugly Mackems 133]

A game that both teams looked happy enough not to lose than go out and win. Bruno looked a different class. 

[wykikitoon 16468]

A decade ago and that's no pen IMO and even this season we've had less turned down. Wood trails the legs but cunts like Salah and Grealish have had them given for years and nobody queries them. 

[Kid Dynamite 5876]

4 hours ago, Gemmill said:

Honestly I thought it could have got overturned cos he knocks the ball ahead and then just seems to drag his foot over the keeper's leg. It was an unnatural movement, I thought. I don't care though but I was relieved when it was confirmed. 

 

Penalty all day. You can't just slide across the path of someone running at full pace and not get the ball. Who hit who first is irrelevant 

 

 

[Gemmill 34151]

He didn't keep running man. He dragged his leg to ensure contact. We were all up in arms when Madison did broadly the same v us for Leicester. I get that that's a penalty now, but I don't really think it should be. 

[ohhh_yeah 2758]

37 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

We were all up in arms when Madison...

 

Bedwetter.

 

[wykikitoon 16468]

38 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

He didn't keep running man. He dragged his leg to ensure contact. We were all up in arms when Madison did broadly the same v us for Leicester. I get that that's a penalty now, but I don't really think it should be. 

G-Dogg once again knocking it out like a best selling album.

Watch it and you see he starts dragging legs.  It's a modern day pen all day.

[Gemmill 34151]

2 minutes ago, wykikitoon said:

G-Dogg once again knocking it out like a best selling album.

Watch it and you see he starts dragging legs.  It's a modern day pen all day.

 

G-Dogg and Yorkshire-T having to regulate all up in this HIZZAYYYYY. BUKKA BUKKA!

[wykikitoon 16468]

[trophyshy 6432]

Get a room ffs. 

[Alex 30215]

1 hour ago, wykikitoon said:

A decade ago and that's no pen IMO and even this season we've had less turned down. Wood trails the legs but cunts like Salah and Grealish have had them given for years and nobody queries them. 

I honestly think there have been people winning penalties like that as long as i can remember watching football 

[Dr Gloom 19716]

It was definitely a case of winning the pen. About time we started getting a few of those. I imagine the number will increase as we become a serious force again. The big clubs always get the soft ones. 

[Gemmill 34151]

11 minutes ago, trophyshy said:

Get a crib ffs. 

 

We're gangstas dickhead. Rooms are for civilians. I've fixed your mistake. 

[wykikitoon 16468]

12 minutes ago, trophyshy said:

Get a room ffs. 

[Alex 30215]

Whether you think it’s right or wrong it’s not ‘new’ or ‘modern’ is my point. It’s just scrutinised a lot more than ever. I think it was a pen tbh. In real time it looked like a stonewall one too. The keeper made a hash of it and Wood took advantage like J69, Andrew etc have alluded to 

[wykikitoon 16468]

7 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

It was definitely a case of winning the pen. About time we started getting a few of those. I imagine the number will increase as we become a serious force again. The big clubs always get the soft ones. 

There's been a couple of games where our players could have done that but tried to be honest. 

[Dr Gloom 19716]

It’s about taking advantage of the opposition player making a poor decision to “win” the foul. It’s an art form in itself. If it gives your team the advantage I’m all for it as it’s not blatant diving/cheating. When a player for one of the “big” clubs do it, the pundits say it’s cute. When the likes of Newcastle win one in a similar manner it’s soft. I expect that to change as of next season. Both the number rewarded in our favour and the response back in the studio as our status as a big boy is begrudgingly accepted