wykikitoon 16610 Posted September 5, 2022 Author Share Posted September 5, 2022 Recent True Faith is decent. Norman talks a lot of sense. The more they talk and not student voice Dan Walker the better. She was asked about Trippier and spent 5 minutes like a dripping tap talking shite to make one point. He's decent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 19811 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 3 hours ago, wykikitoon said: Recent True Faith is decent. Norman talks a lot of sense. The more they talk and not student voice Dan Walker the better. She was asked about Trippier and spent 5 minutes like a dripping tap talking shite to make one point. He's decent. Yeah, Norman is canny. Shout also to special guest Stato Alex from the Toon Review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34419 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 19 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said: Yeah, Norman is canny. Shout also to special guest Stato Alex from the Toon Review Is that who that well spoken kid was? Decent input from him tbf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16610 Posted September 5, 2022 Author Share Posted September 5, 2022 Aye, his take on Anderson was spot on tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 19811 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 20 minutes ago, Gemmill said: Is that who that well spoken kid was? Decent input from him tbf. yeah. The toon review is worth watching. I enjoy his contributions. You and fish will rate him as he loves an xg stat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16610 Posted September 5, 2022 Author Share Posted September 5, 2022 Fuck me, Jabba the hut is on it! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16610 Posted September 5, 2022 Author Share Posted September 5, 2022 True Faith they mentioned about the lack of supply to Isak. Exactly what has happened to Wood for months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34419 Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 Shout out to @Tomin the opening exchanges on Pod on the Tyne this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 14580 Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 46 minutes ago, Gemmill said: Shout out to @Tomin the opening exchanges on Pod on the Tyne this week. Dont tell Dave ffs. Still no new season N.N. Think he’s finding it hard 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16610 Posted September 6, 2022 Author Share Posted September 6, 2022 What an arse kisser 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13836 Posted September 6, 2022 Share Posted September 6, 2022 3 hours ago, Gemmill said: Shout out to @Tomin the opening exchanges on Pod on the Tyne this week. What's the point in having a private Twitter account? Not like I tagged him in it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16610 Posted September 8, 2022 Author Share Posted September 8, 2022 Caulkin and Payne are fucking livid at Waugh this week over the palace disallowed goal 😂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTF 6144 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 16 minutes ago, wykikitoon said: Caulkin and Payne are fucking livid at Waugh this week over the palace disallowed goal 😂 Waugh being overly contrary about the whole incident, saying that Willock was never going to get to the ball and that even without the push he would have gone into the keeper (and committed a foul). I'm wondering which angles he has and hasn't seen to arrive at that conclusion as he's demonstratably incorrect with just about everything he says about it to the point where you have to wonder whether he's just drumming up controversy. Willock has a sudden increase in speed and change in direction outside of his control when Mitchell shoves him. Even with this Guaita is clearly going to be second to make a play on the ball behind Willock and based off the angle he was coming across he has no chance of saving it if Willock gets to head it. There's no guarantee of course that Willock puts it on target, but the height, position, direction and speed at which the ball was moving would have made it a spectacular miss if he didnt. It was a fantastic header from Botman keeping it away from the keeper but squaring it across perfectly. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6302 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 Whether Willock was likely to get there or not is irrelevant. He was fouled and fouled before he clattered into the goalkeeper. The laws of the game state the first offence is punishable, not the last or 'what may have happened'. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTF 6144 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 11 minutes ago, Craig said: Whether Willock was likely to get there or not is irrelevant. He was fouled and fouled before he clattered into the goalkeeper. The laws of the game state the first offence is punishable, not the last or 'what may have happened'. Agree totally, not sure what point Waugh was trying to make. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16610 Posted September 8, 2022 Author Share Posted September 8, 2022 BTW how many tabs does Payne smoke? His lungs when he laughs sound absolutely FUCKED! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34419 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 Given that the ball bounced off Mitchell's head (who was behind Willock pushing him), Waugh can only be wrong about the claim Willock wouldn't have got to the ball. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 4964 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 26 minutes ago, Craig said: Whether Willock was likely to get there or not is irrelevant. He was fouled and fouled before he clattered into the goalkeeper. The laws of the game state the first offence is punishable, not the last or 'what may have happened'. This completely. The game isn't about a series of chained hypotheticals ffs. And since the referee didn't look at the build up anyway by the sounds of it, he had no way of knowing that information in the first place. Waugh is just being contrary. I suppose that makes the show more interesting than if all 3 of them just agreed with each other though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6302 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 41 minutes ago, OTF said: Agree totally, not sure what point Waugh was trying to make. Being contrary 'just for the sake of it' I should imagine which seems to be a requirement of modern day punditry - probably just to foster a debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3193 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 15 minutes ago, Craig said: Being contrary 'just for the sake of it' I should imagine which seems to be a requirement of modern day punditry - probably just to foster a debate. the "Talkshit way" 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16610 Posted September 8, 2022 Author Share Posted September 8, 2022 TBF to Waugh, I don't think he's like that at all. He was saying he didn't think it was a pen. He said he thought the goal should have stood, but didn't think it was a pen. He also didn't think without the shove Willock wouldn't have scored. Which they argued about. IMO, that shove anywhere else on the pitch it's a FK. Which is similar to the Schar foul. Why Ref's shit their pants when incidents are in the box I don't know. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34419 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 Aye he believed what he was saying, I'm confident of that. Like the other two, I think he was wrong, but I don't think he was being the contrarian. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6302 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 (edited) 20 minutes ago, wykikitoon said: TBF to Waugh, I don't think he's like that at all. He was saying he didn't think it was a pen. He said he thought the goal should have stood, but didn't think it was a pen. He also didn't think without the shove Willock wouldn't have scored. Which they argued about. IMO, that shove anywhere else on the pitch it's a FK. Which is similar to the Schar foul. Why Ref's shit their pants when incidents are in the box I don't know. It was either a goal, or a penalty. The only reason it wasn't a penalty is the goal should have stood. Put it this way, had the ball bounced wide rather than into the net, would Salisbury have awarded a penalty? This is why I think match officials should have media duties or, at the very least, their match reports should be public domain so their rationale can be understood. The wall of silence only serves to heighten people's ire. Edited September 8, 2022 by Craig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammynb 2929 Posted September 8, 2022 Share Posted September 8, 2022 4 minutes ago, Craig said: Put it this way, had the ball bounced wide rather than into the net, would Salisbury have awarded a penalty? Of course he would have. But Mason would have called him over to the review the situation. Shown him 10 seconds of Bob the Builder and told him to chalk it off as a goal kick! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 16610 Posted September 8, 2022 Author Share Posted September 8, 2022 23 minutes ago, Craig said: It was either a goal, or a penalty. The only reason it wasn't a penalty is the goal should have stood. Put it this way, had the ball bounced wide rather than into the net, would Salisbury have awarded a penalty? This is why I think match officials should have media duties or, at the very least, their match reports should be public domain so their rationale can be understood. The wall of silence only serves to heighten people's ire. That's a very good point if the ball hadn't gone in and one I haven't seen mentioned anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now