Jump to content

Extra Time on Extra Time Hating Bastards v Exhibition Building Loving, Shandy Drinking Fannies

wykikitoon

By wykikitoon,
in Newcastle Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Howay

Howay 12452

Posted
Posted
Just now, Craig said:

 

Mason has done precisely what he is meant to do :smile:

He literally hasn’t. You only send it to the referee if there is a clear and obvious error made, what was the clear and obvious error made on the play? There was no foul on Guita, Willock was pushed into him the VAR ref rightly reviewed the play and should have saw that the push caused the impact to the keeper and not advised the referee to review his decision. Instead he wrongly advised the referee to review his decision with the sideline monitor - going to the sideline monitor is not VAR review that is the VAR official saying the referee is incorrect. 
 

Last post on this for me because you’re not going to own up to being wrong despite everyone telling you with people even citing the FA guidelines. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 484
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

trophyshy
trophyshy

This thread has gone ashtray.  

Christmas Tree
Christmas Tree

You’re fucking going with Adam P arnt you  

Howmanheyman
Howmanheyman

Posted Images

OTF

OTF 6144

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Craig said:

 

FFS Wykiki .... Mason doesn't make the decision. He's operating within guidelines, he has no jurisdiction to award or deny the goal, all he can do is suggest the on-field official reviews the monitor. The goalkeeper was taken out so the monitor review is a slam-dunk. It's the bloke watching the monitor that's fucked up. Mason has done what he's instructed to do.

 

Firstly, you're hilarious. Secondly the VAR can also see why Willock has collided with the keeper and therefore determine that he hasn't committed a foul. You yourself believe this to be the case so why would the VAR ever suggest the ref should have a look at it? You're not making any sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Craig

Craig 6302

Posted
Posted
Just now, OTF said:

 

Firstly, you're hilarious. Secondly the VAR can also see why Willock has collided with the keeper and therefore determine that he hasn't committed a foul. You yourself believe this to be the case so why would the VAR ever suggest the ref should have a look at it? You're not making any sense.

 

Because the VAR official has no jurisdiction to overturn a goal. Only to advise the referee to review it pitchside which, when the goalkeeper has been taken out is a slam-dunk review. Perfect sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wykikitoon

wykikitoon 16612

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, Craig said:

 

Because the VAR official has no jurisdiction to overturn a goal. Only to advise the referee to review it pitchside which, when the goalkeeper has been taken out is a slam-dunk review. Perfect sense

So Craig, please, patience.  As I haven't fully seen it.

Salisbury (on field ref) says what he has seen?
Mason checks it, says he needs to check for a foul (when there isn't one)
Sailsbury looks at the same monitor Mason is seeing.

Then goals (No goal).

How the fuck can Sailsbury look at that and come to the conclusion it's a foul :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Howay

Howay 12452

Posted
Posted

Just another game where our lack of quality on the ball cost us, Howe’s game plan is so impressive Palace are a good side and there was very few spells of the game where Palace had any type of control or attack in numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OTF

OTF 6144

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Craig said:

 

Because the VAR official has no jurisdiction to overturn a goal. Only to advise the referee to review it pitchside which, when the goalkeeper has been taken out is a slam-dunk review. Perfect sense

 

Paraphrased.

Craig: "The referee made a mistake when looking at the monitor because no foul was committed against their keeper"

 

Also Craig: "The VAR has to advise the ref to have a look at the foul against their keeper"

  • Jaysus... 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OTF

OTF 6144

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Howay said:

Anderson looks to have real quality on the ball, really hope Howe starts giving him a chance over some of the players starting. 

Absolutely, looks ready to play a bigger part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MrBass

MrBass 2216

Posted
Posted

What a frustrating afternoon. Our midfield are very average without Bruno and ASM. 

 

As for that VAR decision, less said about that the better. 
 

Also wish Eddie would sometimes make his subs a bit earlier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NJS

NJS 3977

Posted
Posted

Might have been said but the selection of the angle and the removal of the second before the collision which includes the push is what should be questioned. 

 

I don't blame the ref given what he was shown but the edit stinks and Mason not highlighting the push given he'd have seen the full replay set reekks even more. 

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Isegrim

Isegrim 8870

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Howay said:

Just another game where our lack of quality on the ball cost us, Howe’s game plan is so impressive Palace are a good side and there was very few spells of the game where Palace had any type of control or attack in numbers. 

It would be so exciting to watch us these days if the inconsistency of the refereeing wasn’t costing us again and again. The amount of dubious or plainly absurd decisions against not just this season but lost season is taking all the fun out of it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Renton

Renton 17745

Posted
Posted

I didn't see or listen to the game and tried to keep up with it on the Sky app and on here. My observations.

1) Fortress St James still unbleached but obviously we need 3 points from most home games.

2) sounds like we were unlucky not to win with VAR over ruling a legitimate goal and hitting the woodwork twice.

3) This is an abortion of a thread. Started off bad enough with some gif frenzy (soz for my part in that) and the rest is just a pile on on Craig about who is to blame for the VAR balls up. 

4) Gemmill went to this and must take his share of the blame the fucking Jonah. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

  I accept