Eddie Howe and Gemmill's Current Hyperefficient Dreamboats vs. Eddie Howe's Former Wimpy Kids

[toonotl 1875]

And that is why Miggy avoids using his right peg. Holy hell what a miss. 

[NJS 3449]

One footed cunt. 

[Andrew 3660]

Miggyyyyy

[GrahamTaylor5 439]

1 minute ago, NJS said:

One footed cunt. 

Safe to say that might right foot is as good as Miggy's. Pity I am right footed.

[toonotl 1875]

This has a similar feeling to the league match against these lot. Let's hope they don't score from the single chance they manage to create at some point because it has the sense of a game where we're destined to avoid scoring.

[Ayatollah Hermione 11650]

The linesman can’t see who got the last touch for throw-ins two yards away but could

somehow see that Willock touched that through a crowd of about 3 players from 30 yards away. What a life

[Polarboy 2117]

You don't have to touch the ball to be interfering with play. 

[trophyshy 5687]

Too easy for Almiron. Rejected. 

[trooper 934]

Is it 90 minutes  then penalties tonight

[trophyshy 5687]

Just now, Polarboy said:

You don't have to touch the ball to be interfering with play. 

[Gemmill 29421]

Just now, Polarboy said:

You don't have to touch the ball to be interfering with play. 

 

The only person he could vaguely have been said to interfere with was Wilson. It was just a bullshit decision. 

[NJS 3449]

Bit of a cliche but they're definitely rusty. 

[Gemmill 29421]

Get Maxi on for some dribbly shenanigans second half and we'll knack these. 

[Toonpack 5902]

Rusty as fuck, to be expected, we'll be fine.

 

P.S. Maddison not in Leicester squad tonight 🤷🏼‍♂️

[Meenzer 12734]

5 minutes ago, trooper said:

Is it 90 minutes  then penalties tonight

 

Yep

[Polarboy 2117]

7 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

The only person he could vaguely have been said to interfere with was Wilson. It was just a bullshit decision. 

 

If you obstruct the keepers view, prevent him from coming for the ball, or even attempt to play the ball without actually touching it when in an offside position, it's interfering with play. The ball went under Willock as far as I recall and he attempted to play it, so it  he could be said to be interfering on all of the above counts.

Edited December 20, 2022 by Polarboy

[GrahamTaylor5 439]

1 minute ago, Polarboy said:

 

If you obstruct the keepers view or even attempt to play the ball without actually touching it when in an offside position, it's interfering with play. The ball went under Willock as far as I recall so it obscured the keepers view in that moment. 

Willock was on the deck. I cannot see how he would obscure the view. I can see why the linesman decided to make the incorrect call though.

[Polarboy 2117]

1 minute ago, GrahamTaylor5 said:

Willock was on the deck. I cannot see how he would obscure the view. I can see why the linesman decided to make the incorrect call though.

Wilson took the ball under and through Willock didn't he. It's a fairly subjective rule, but I've seen worse calls on interfering with play. 

[ewerk 23638]

5 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

Rusty as fuck, to be expected, we'll be fine.

 

P.S. Maddison not in Leicester squad tonight 🤷🏼‍♂️

They’re just keeping him fresh for us.

 

That big contract he’s going to sign in January requires a LOT of signatures.

[Polarboy 2117]

The commentator just confirmed that the ref said he saw a very slight touch from Willock for the disallowed goal. 🤷‍♂️

[GrahamTaylor5 439]

Just now, Polarboy said:

Wilson took the ball under and through Willock didn't he. It's a fairly subjective rule, but I've seen worse calls on interfering with play. 

That is not the way that I saw it. I didn't see Willock make any contact. I may be wrong though. 

[toonotl 1875]

5 minutes ago, Polarboy said:

 

If you obstruct the keepers view, prevent him from coming for the ball, or even attempt to play the ball without actually touching it when in an offside position, it's interfering with play. The ball went under Willock as far as I recall and he attempted to play it, so it  he could be said to be interfering on all of the above counts.

 

Commentator confirmed after halftime that ref and linesman conferred and deemed that Willock touched the ball. That's why it was disallowed. Except he didn't touch it. Stop it. 

[Kevin Carr's Gloves 2760]

Longstaff is shit

[Gemmill 29421]

Commentator just pulled a @Howmanheymanand mistook Billing for Solanke. Outrageous. 

[Polarboy 2117]

3 minutes ago, toonotl said:

 

Commentator confirmed after halftime that ref and linesman conferred and deemed that Willock touched the ball. That's why it was disallowed. Except he didn't touch it. Stop it. 

 

😂 What do you mean stop it? I was literally relaying the FA's rules on interfering with play. That the ref says he disallowed it for that doesn't mean that Willock wasn't also possibly making other infringements. Again I'd need to watch the clip again, but the rules I mentioned are legit. 

 

"Offside offence

interfering with an opponent by: preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent's line of vision or. challenging an opponent for the ball or. clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or."