Kid Dynamite 5874 Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 (edited) ------------------- Rooney --------------------------- -------------Lampard----Gerrard-------------------- J.Cole-------------Carrick-------------Beckham---- ------------------------I------------------------------- ------------------------I ------------------------------ ------------------------V------------------------------- A.Cole----Campbell-----Terry-------Hargreaves-- --------------------Robinson-------------------------- Pretty much what most on here were after, me included. Not sure what Carragher did to warrant being dropped like, especially as Hargreaves had his only 1 decent game for England in CM If Carrick does his job and Gerrard feels free to push on and not play second fiddle to (couldnt hit a barn door) Lampard, I reckon we might have our first half decent performance on Sunday. Heres Hoping! Edited June 24, 2006 by J69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInspiration 1 Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Should be Hargreaves there - proper defensive midfielder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 5874 Posted June 24, 2006 Author Share Posted June 24, 2006 Dunno, I feel Carrick is more disciplined in that he will stop behind half way whereas hargreaves like a bit mosey forward every now and again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CrimsonFault Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 At least Carrick can make a proper 50 yard ball, unlike Beckham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInspiration 1 Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 (edited) At least Carrick can make a proper 50 yard ball, unlike Beckham. 152764[/snapback] Was his pass the length of the pitch, to Rooney fake then? Edited June 24, 2006 by TheInspiration Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CrimsonFault Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 At least Carrick can make a proper 50 yard ball, unlike Beckham. 152764[/snapback] Was his pass the length of the pitch, to Rooney fake then? 152768[/snapback] About the first one of the tournament. The amount of long balls Beckham has tried and wasted throughout the 3 games has been terrible. Of course ones going to come off now and then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34151 Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Poor Hargreaves. Puts a good shift in at CM and gets rewarded with a place at RB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 4795 Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Poor Hargreaves. Puts a good shift in at CM and gets rewarded with a place at RB. 152783[/snapback] Then will have a shite game and his good work v Sweden will be forgotten. Once more he will be "shit". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 1 Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Poor Hargreaves. Puts a good shift in at CM and gets rewarded with a place at RB. 152783[/snapback] Then will have a shite game and his good work v Sweden will be forgotten. Once more he will be "shit". 152788[/snapback] This decision is mental. I thought both Carragher and Hargreves especially had been playing quite well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CrimsonFault Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Poor Hargreaves. Puts a good shift in at CM and gets rewarded with a place at RB. 152783[/snapback] He shouldn't be Canadian then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally 0 Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Hargreaves should be there based on the Sweden game. I swear Sven gets paid £4m a year and he's absolutely clueless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Lazaru 0 Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 Poor Hargreaves. Puts a good shift in at CM and gets rewarded with a place at RB. 152783[/snapback] Then will have a shite game and his good work v Sweden will be forgotten. Once more he will be "shit". 152788[/snapback] This decision is mental. I thought both Carragher and Hargreves especially had been playing quite well. 152793[/snapback] Its a totally brainless decsion from Sven. Hargreaves put ina good game in the "holding role" so straight away Sven takes him out there to play Carrick. And instead of playing Carragher at RB he will play Hargreaves way out of positon where he will probably struggle through no fault of his own. And finally having decided to play Hargreaves there he still makes a further cock up of playing a totally out of sorts Campbell ahead of Carragher at CB! I've no problem with Carrick or Hargreaves playing in the holding role, but the rest of it is ludicrous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInspiration 1 Posted June 24, 2006 Share Posted June 24, 2006 I think Hargreaves at right-back has something to do with him being fast, and can overlap Beckham and link up well, unlike Carragher, who is very reliable defensively but can't get forward, preventing us from getting the best out of Beckham. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 5874 Posted June 25, 2006 Author Share Posted June 25, 2006 Almost right. They have earmarked Ecuadors LW as the main threat and feel Hargreaves is the fitter/faster runner/better tackler so they have put him in at RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now