Sima 0 Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_accident Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 I read somewhere how there weren't nearly as many fatalities as they expected. Safe as houses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted August 4, 2006 Author Share Posted August 4, 2006 Yeah, it says that in that Wiki article tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 Yeah, it says that in that Wiki article tbh 170455[/snapback] Ahhh. Mebeez in future you can direct us to your point rather than posting random links and expecting us to read a fucking book then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 I like the way Sima put the link on just in case you hadn't heard of Chernobyl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted August 4, 2006 Author Share Posted August 4, 2006 just a blatant spin-off thread tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 just a blatant spin-off thread tbh 170458[/snapback] I got that so I think everyone else did. Apart from Toonraider mebbies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8868 Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 I like the way Sima put the link on just in case you hadn't heard of Chernobyl 170457[/snapback] Well, it's really kind as I thought Skol had changed his username again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17628 Posted August 4, 2006 Share Posted August 4, 2006 Yeah, it says that in that Wiki article tbh 170455[/snapback] Ahhh. Mebeez in future you can direct us to your point rather than posting random links and expecting us to read a fucking book then. 170456[/snapback] It was the subject of Panorama maybe 3 weeks ago. In the entire history of nuclear power, only 47 people have died from radiation-induced illnesses, including cancer. Mainly because radiation is completely safe at low levels apparently. Not a message the Greens are keen to promote for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 6766 Posted August 5, 2006 Share Posted August 5, 2006 Yeah, it says that in that Wiki article tbh 170455[/snapback] Ahhh. Mebeez in future you can direct us to your point rather than posting random links and expecting us to read a fucking book then. 170456[/snapback] It was the subject of Panorama maybe 3 weeks ago. In the entire history of nuclear power, only 47 people have died from radiation-induced illnesses, including cancer. Mainly because radiation is completely safe at low levels apparently. Not a message the Greens are keen to promote for some reason. 170465[/snapback] Was at the dentists yesterday and it NEVER ceases to crack me up when they take an X'Ray and they say, "can you just hold that in place there" then the Dentist and nursey run away out of the door before "pressing the button". I LOL yesterday and the Dentist asked why I mentioned the XRay palaver "Oh it's perfectly safe, RUN AWAY RUN AWAY" They wear radiation badges now and he said they get higher readings from a TV than from the XRay machine!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now