Shearergol 0 Posted August 21, 2006 Share Posted August 21, 2006 Aye I reckon we might end up with him. Didn't see much of the Chelsea game yesterday, but supposedly Bridge had a good game. 181721[/snapback] Apparently Spurs are sniffing around Bridge now, so things aren't as cut and dried as most of us hoped they would be. 182190[/snapback] They've wanted him for ages. Can see him wanting to stay down south too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted August 21, 2006 Share Posted August 21, 2006 Aye I reckon we might end up with him. Didn't see much of the Chelsea game yesterday, but supposedly Bridge had a good game. 181721[/snapback] Apparently Spurs are sniffing around Bridge now, so things aren't as cut and dried as most of us hoped they would be. 182190[/snapback] They've wanted him for ages. Can see him wanting to stay down south too. 182199[/snapback] I have a confession. I have always thought Bridge looked a big wet blouse tbh. If he comes here I may well change my view, but if he goes to 'the lane' I wont Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 8862 Posted August 21, 2006 Share Posted August 21, 2006 I actually don't get where Chelsea's scouts get this "can play at left back, too" from. I am pretty sure Boulahrouz didn't play a single game at left back for HSV and only occasionally playing right back for the Dutch team. Maybe he is can play left wing as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 21, 2006 Share Posted August 21, 2006 I actually don't get where Chelsea's scouts get this "can play at left back, too" from. I am pretty sure Boulahrouz didn't play a single game at left back for HSV and only occasionally playing right back for the Dutch team. Maybe he is can play left wing as well? 182331[/snapback] He'd be better than Babayaro at left back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shido 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Being able to play across the entire back four doesn't make someone a mercenary, shockingly enough. 182177[/snapback] I dunno if that was meant for me, but I didn't say that. I said he was a defensive mercenary dot dot can play anywhere. So cool your jets eddie... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Being able to play across the entire back four doesn't make someone a mercenary, shockingly enough. 182177[/snapback] I dunno if that was meant for me, but I didn't say that. I said he was a defensive mercenary dot dot can play anywhere. So cool your jets eddie... 182417[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Being able to play across the entire back four doesn't make someone a mercenary, shockingly enough. 182177[/snapback] I dunno if that was meant for me, but I didn't say that. I said he was a defensive mercenary dot dot can play anywhere. So cool your jets eddie... 182417[/snapback] All you've done is confirm that's what you actually did say, though. Use of ... indicates a cutting out of irrelevent text in an article but whilst still wanting to continue a point/cohesive sentence. Eg, Hecht declares, and then becomes increasingly more specific as the horrors increase; moving from 'that camp' to ' the children,' and then finally to Yolek himself, 'Yolek... who wasn't a day/ over five years old,' who was marched between 'armed guards.' as opposed to: Yolek who had bad lungs, who wasn't a day Over five years old, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Did you know what he meant? Because I did... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Being able to play across the entire back four doesn't make someone a mercenary, shockingly enough. 182177[/snapback] I dunno if that was meant for me, but I didn't say that. I said he was a defensive mercenary dot dot can play anywhere. So cool your jets eddie... 182417[/snapback] All you've done is confirm that's what you actually did say, though. Use of ... indicates a cutting out of irrelevent text in an article but whilst still wanting to continue a point/cohesive sentence. Eg, Hecht declares, and then becomes increasingly more specific as the horrors increase; moving from 'that camp' to ' the children,' and then finally to Yolek himself, 'Yolek... who wasn't a day/ over five years old,' who was marched between 'armed guards.' as opposed to: Yolek who had bad lungs, who wasn't a day Over five years old, 182684[/snapback] Can this Yolek play left back?? And just because a website had his age as under five years old, doesn't mean he is!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Did you know what he meant? Because I did... 182698[/snapback] Doesn't take any prisoners on the pitch is what I thought it meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34138 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I thought it meant he could play anywhere across the back four. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I thought it meant he could play anywhere across the back four. 182713[/snapback] That's probably it tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snakehips 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Oh, and does this Yolek like cheese, perchance?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I thought it meant he could play anywhere across the back four. 182713[/snapback] Aye, I thought the "can play anywhere" was clear, although I chuckled at the rather strange usage of the word mercenary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34138 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I think of him more as a defensive soldier of fortune. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I think of him more as a defensive soldier of fortune. 182725[/snapback] Who has gone a bit native / chicken oriental? You see the cannibal remarks he made? He likes to eat attackers raw apparently. Its how he survives at the back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I thought it meant he could play anywhere across the back four. 182713[/snapback] That's probably it tbh 182718[/snapback] That's what I had it down as too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I thought it meant he could play anywhere across the back four. 182713[/snapback] That's probably it tbh 182718[/snapback] That's what I had it down as too. 182733[/snapback] Bollocks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I thought it meant he could play anywhere across the back four. 182713[/snapback] That's probably it tbh 182718[/snapback] That's what I had it down as too. 182733[/snapback] Bollocks! 182741[/snapback] it was the whole point of my original response! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Alex is the only person in this thread who had Boulahrouz down as Dolph Lundgren in Universal Soldier. FACT! Patrokles is a filthy pedant, FACTER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34138 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Shola: I come in peace. Bouhlarouz: You go in pieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Alex is the only person in this thread who had Boulahrouz down as Dolph Lundgren in Universal Soldier. FACT! Patrokles is a filthy pedant, FACTER! 182753[/snapback] Well, there's a difference between pointing out things like incorrect capitalisation, etc, and a word that changes the entire meaning of a post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I thought it meant he could play anywhere across the back four. 182713[/snapback] That's probably it tbh 182718[/snapback] That's what I had it down as too. 182733[/snapback] Bollocks! 182741[/snapback] it was the whole point of my original response! 182744[/snapback] So you're original response was aimed at luckyluke then? Got it now. I'm sure Shido is now more aware of where to use dotted lines too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Patrokles Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Alex is the only person in this thread who had Boulahrouz down as Dolph Lundgren in Universal Soldier. FACT! Patrokles is a filthy pedant, FACTER! 182753[/snapback] Not as good as Thompers' Ballack/Matt Damon notion, and subsequent BITTER RAILING AGAINST AN ENTIRE WEBSITE because no one agreed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Alex is the only person in this thread who had Boulahrouz down as Dolph Lundgren in Universal Soldier. FACT! Patrokles is a filthy pedant, FACTER! 182753[/snapback] Arnie in 'Predator'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now