Jimbo 133 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Must be a bastard playing ping-pong and dominoes every day for the rest of his life. Personally speaking, if he wants to die, fine, but take his life in the same manner he took his victims, drown the fucker in the bath. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17597 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Must be a bastard playing ping-pong and dominoes every day for the rest of his life. Personally speaking, if he wants to die, fine, but take his life in the same manner he took his victims, drown the fucker in the bath. 192910[/snapback] Is that what you seriously think should happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Must be a bastard playing ping-pong and dominoes every day for the rest of his life. Personally speaking, if he wants to die, fine, but take his life in the same manner he took his victims, drown the fucker in the bath. 192910[/snapback] Is that what you seriously think should happen? 192913[/snapback] Yep. I don't see what he's done to deserve the right to cherry pick his own exit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 You've got to be careful about the bog roll you give him, could hang himself with it. Best give him the soft stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17597 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Must be a bastard playing ping-pong and dominoes every day for the rest of his life. Personally speaking, if he wants to die, fine, but take his life in the same manner he took his victims, drown the fucker in the bath. 192910[/snapback] Is that what you seriously think should happen? 192913[/snapback] Yep. I don't see what he's done to deserve the right to cherry pick his own exit. 192915[/snapback] Doesn't strike me as what a civilised society would do. Why not take it to extremes, for instance knock down drunk drivers or burgle a burglars house? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Only B&W tellies too and they should only have 1st generation games consoles. 192897[/snapback] And I had you down as a liberal. 192901[/snapback] I thought you had me down as a Nazi. 192909[/snapback] Liberal National Socialist Does your right hand jump up uncontrollably when you're trying to type? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Only B&W tellies too and they should only have 1st generation games consoles. 192897[/snapback] And I had you down as a liberal. 192901[/snapback] I thought you had me down as a Nazi. 192909[/snapback] Liberal National Socialist Does your right hand jump up uncontrollably when you're trying to type? 192921[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Must be a bastard playing ping-pong and dominoes every day for the rest of his life. Personally speaking, if he wants to die, fine, but take his life in the same manner he took his victims, drown the fucker in the bath. 192910[/snapback] Is that what you seriously think should happen? 192913[/snapback] Yep. I don't see what he's done to deserve the right to cherry pick his own exit. 192915[/snapback] How does that work then? People can die as long as they go the same way as their victims? So Harold Shipman would have been allowed to have a painless death for killing dozens of people yet a guilt-ridden person who kill someone in a case of death by dangerous driving has to be have a head on smash with another vehicle (for example)? I'm sensing a few flaws already tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6287 Posted September 5, 2006 Author Share Posted September 5, 2006 If the evil fucker wants to die that much, allow the authorities to arrange it but make it as drawn out and painful as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Must be a bastard playing ping-pong and dominoes every day for the rest of his life. Personally speaking, if he wants to die, fine, but take his life in the same manner he took his victims, drown the fucker in the bath. 192910[/snapback] Is that what you seriously think should happen? 192913[/snapback] Yep. I don't see what he's done to deserve the right to cherry pick his own exit. 192915[/snapback] How does that work then? People can die as long as they go the same way as their victims? So Harold Shipman would have been allowed to have a painless death for killing dozens of people yet a guilt-ridden person who kill someone in a case of death by dangerous driving has to be have a head on smash with another vehicle (for example)? I'm sensing a few flaws already tbh. 192929[/snapback] Its just an opinion, flawed as it maybe, thats just what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 If the evil fucker wants to die that much, allow the authorities to arrange it but make it as drawn out and painful as possible. 192944[/snapback] If someone wants to die and you advocate it, do you think they are going to agree to dying by as painful a method as possible? Also, who is going to benefit from this? If, the said person agrees to this form of death, would you not question their sanity / state of mind and (therefore) their ability to make this decision? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Must be a bastard playing ping-pong and dominoes every day for the rest of his life. Personally speaking, if he wants to die, fine, but take his life in the same manner he took his victims, drown the fucker in the bath. 192910[/snapback] Is that what you seriously think should happen? 192913[/snapback] Yep. I don't see what he's done to deserve the right to cherry pick his own exit. 192915[/snapback] How does that work then? People can die as long as they go the same way as their victims? So Harold Shipman would have been allowed to have a painless death for killing dozens of people yet a guilt-ridden person who kill someone in a case of death by dangerous driving has to be have a head on smash with another vehicle (for example)? I'm sensing a few flaws already tbh. 192929[/snapback] Its just an opinion, flawed as it maybe, thats just what it is. 192949[/snapback] How does it work then? In the way I've described? As I see it, it doesn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 13957 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Huntley should be subjected to the moral outrage radiation of every Mail reader who cared more about this case than Damilola because the victims were white and wore Man U tops in the picture circulated to the press. Dead in minutes tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13804 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 He'l die and go to hell. Its hardly a 'way out'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 133 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Must be a bastard playing ping-pong and dominoes every day for the rest of his life. Personally speaking, if he wants to die, fine, but take his life in the same manner he took his victims, drown the fucker in the bath. 192910[/snapback] Is that what you seriously think should happen? 192913[/snapback] Yep. I don't see what he's done to deserve the right to cherry pick his own exit. 192915[/snapback] How does that work then? People can die as long as they go the same way as their victims? So Harold Shipman would have been allowed to have a painless death for killing dozens of people yet a guilt-ridden person who kill someone in a case of death by dangerous driving has to be have a head on smash with another vehicle (for example)? I'm sensing a few flaws already tbh. 192929[/snapback] Its just an opinion, flawed as it maybe, thats just what it is. 192949[/snapback] How does it work then? In the way I've described? As I see it, it doesn't work. 192951[/snapback] Debating it isn't going to change my mind, its my opinion, if he wants to die, fine, let him die in the manner of his victims, if not, let him rot in his cell. Others have stated that they would like to see him die a painful death, I see you are not questioning them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34166 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 He'l die and go to hell. Its hardly a 'way out'. 192954[/snapback] Aye, he didn't reckon with [booming devil voice]ETERNAL DAMNATION MUHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA[/booming devil voice] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13804 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 He'l die and go to hell. Its hardly a 'way out'. 192954[/snapback] Aye, he didn't reckon with [booming devil voice]ETERNAL DAMNATION MUHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA[/booming devil voice] 192957[/snapback] To be honest though hell would be abreak from playing Ping Pong everday! Out of interest who the hell does he play ping pong with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 34166 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 He'l die and go to hell. Its hardly a 'way out'. 192954[/snapback] Aye, he didn't reckon with [booming devil voice]ETERNAL DAMNATION MUHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA[/booming devil voice] 192957[/snapback] To be honest though hell would be abreak from playing Ping Pong everday! Out of interest who the hell does he play ping pong with? 192960[/snapback] Satan himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 17597 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 He'l die and go to hell. Its hardly a 'way out'. 192954[/snapback] Aye, he didn't reckon with [booming devil voice]ETERNAL DAMNATION MUHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA[/booming devil voice] 192957[/snapback] To be honest though hell would be abreak from playing Ping Pong everday! Out of interest who the hell does he play ping pong with? 192960[/snapback] The ghost of Dr Shipman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Huntley should be subjected to the moral outrage radiation of every Mail reader who cared more about this case than Damilola because the victims were white and wore Man U tops in the picture circulated to the press. Dead in minutes tbh. 192952[/snapback] Both murders were pretty different though. The Mail (much as I hate it) went after the killers of Stephen Lawrence big style. Or was it the Express? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 13804 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6287 Posted September 5, 2006 Author Share Posted September 5, 2006 If the evil fucker wants to die that much, allow the authorities to arrange it but make it as drawn out and painful as possible. 192944[/snapback] If someone wants to die and you advocate it, do you think they are going to agree to dying by as painful a method as possible? Also, who is going to benefit from this? If, the said person agrees to this form of death, would you not question their sanity / state of mind and (therefore) their ability to make this decision? 192950[/snapback] Who said anything about him agreeing to how he goes? He's made two suicide attempts now so he's obviously keen to shuffle off this mortal coil most likely as he's enduring a living hell in prison. Those kids had no option as to how they died so why the fuck should he? I'm with Jimbo, I accept that people will find my opinion flawed, but it is MY opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 13957 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Huntley should be subjected to the moral outrage radiation of every Mail reader who cared more about this case than Damilola because the victims were white and wore Man U tops in the picture circulated to the press. Dead in minutes tbh. 192952[/snapback] Both murders were pretty different though. The Mail (much as I hate it) went after the killers of Stephen Lawrence big style. Or was it the Express? 192964[/snapback] Aye, fair play. I'm as bad as Leazes and his "Guardian-reading sandalista" smears when I'm in a mood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 13957 Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 If the evil fucker wants to die that much, allow the authorities to arrange it but make it as drawn out and painful as possible. 192944[/snapback] If someone wants to die and you advocate it, do you think they are going to agree to dying by as painful a method as possible? Also, who is going to benefit from this? If, the said person agrees to this form of death, would you not question their sanity / state of mind and (therefore) their ability to make this decision? 192950[/snapback] Who said anything about him agreeing to how he goes? He's made two suicide attempts now so he's obviously keen to shuffle off this mortal coil most likely as he's enduring a living hell in prison. Those kids had no option as to how they died so why the fuck should he? I'm with Jimbo, I accept that people will find my opinion flawed, but it is MY opinion. 192966[/snapback] I imagine having kids would inevitably change one's opinion on the matter. Not necessarily making it more right/wrong, but as a parent you probably can't help but think "what if...?". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 5, 2006 Share Posted September 5, 2006 Must be a bastard playing ping-pong and dominoes every day for the rest of his life. Personally speaking, if he wants to die, fine, but take his life in the same manner he took his victims, drown the fucker in the bath. 192910[/snapback] Is that what you seriously think should happen? 192913[/snapback] Yep. I don't see what he's done to deserve the right to cherry pick his own exit. 192915[/snapback] How does that work then? People can die as long as they go the same way as their victims? So Harold Shipman would have been allowed to have a painless death for killing dozens of people yet a guilt-ridden person who kill someone in a case of death by dangerous driving has to be have a head on smash with another vehicle (for example)? I'm sensing a few flaws already tbh. 192929[/snapback] Its just an opinion, flawed as it maybe, thats just what it is. 192949[/snapback] How does it work then? In the way I've described? As I see it, it doesn't work. 192951[/snapback] Debating it isn't going to change my mind, its my opinion, if he wants to die, fine, let him die in the manner of his victims, if not, let him rot in his cell. Others have stated that they would like to see him die a painful death, I see you are not questioning them. 192956[/snapback] I have taken issue with what others have said though I asked you how you would apply the principal to others, you seem unable to answer though. I can understand why you think he should die a painful death, I've just pointed out how I don't think it would work in society. It's all very well saying that should happen, but it could never work imo. Can you envisage a way that it would? If you can't, it's a stupid idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now