Howaythelads

I haven't read it either, but to be fair, the competition on here is tough. One of the most interesting posts I've ever seen by Gemma was that blank one she posted today, like. I think that one beats the 5,000+ on N.O hand down tbh. 102873[/snapback] Chomp 102874[/snapback] Eh? Is your head up your arse Alex? 102878[/snapback] Thats a bit rich....wheres your other hand? 102881[/snapback] Probably where you would like to put your gob.

I haven't read it either, but to be fair, the competition on here is tough. One of the most interesting posts I've ever seen by Gemma was that blank one she posted today, like. I think that one beats the 5,000+ on N.O hand down tbh. 102873[/snapback] Gemma - remind me again who's the childish one, you enormous tosser. 102883[/snapback] Ok, Graeme, then. How's that?

I haven't read it either, but to be fair, the competition on here is tough. One of the most interesting posts I've ever seen by Gemma was that blank one she posted today, like. I think that one beats the 5,000+ on N.O hand down tbh. 102873[/snapback] Chomp 102874[/snapback] Eh? Is your head up your arse Alex?

I haven't read it either, but to be fair, the competition on here is tough. One of the most interesting posts I've ever seen by Gemma was that blank one she posted today, like. I think that one beats the 5,000+ on N.O hand down tbh.

I think I'd be reading some different posts had this lip reading been of someone having a verbal at an England player in the Spain/England match.

Because football is different to the housing market?

what the fuck do you mean by that? 102746[/snapback] I'm looking for the hidden meaning in what sumo said, you know, something honest and accurate such as, "Luque is a pile of shite and a waste of money", or "Bellamy and Robert are top players and shouldn't have been engineered out of the club", or "HTL was right all along, Souness is a wanker". But no, I've given this some concentrated thought for the last few hours and I reckon that what he's saying is that the mods over on N-O aren't in people's pockets.

It was an absolute sitter tbh. 101539[/snapback] Yup, I don't think many but the most rabid Bellamy hater would think Bellamy didn't do well for that goal. It was an absolute sitter of the highest order but Bellamy got him out of jail.

Well yes, you can compare them in the same way you would Bellamy and Shearer then. 101216[/snapback] Would you, conceivably, play Shearer and Bellamy upfront together - yes. Would you play Robert and N'zogbia in the same team wide-left - no. Therefore comparing the former is different to comparing the latter in this context. 101218[/snapback] Isn't Zoggys favoured position center mid though? Alternatively you could always play Robert up front or just behind the front man. Then there's the old debate of whether Zoggy could do a job as a LB... 101331[/snapback] Yes, so he said in an interview. He views himself as a central midfielder, which of course makes Alex's argument about comparing him with Robert look a bit daft.

What on earth are you on about now?

Not all of us were signing his praises prior to Souness! 101089[/snapback] I accept that not everyone knows a good footballer when they see one. Their ( and your ) problem.

The contradiction in the two bits in bold made me laugh, thanks like. BTW You need to go back a damn sight further than 15 years. You may be going back as far as the 50's to find a player who contributed more. But what the hell, he couldn't tackle like Dave Mackay so he's obviously shite.

Losing our best player due to the manager's ego, and having that decision supported and applauded by many people on here is very, very, very important stuff.

Well I'm saying I can't doss as much with MSN. You can always ignore e-mails and can quite easily watch day time TV while answering telephone calls. 101075[/snapback] Hadn't realised that like, suppose is depends on whether a person has a professional attitude or not. Anyway, sounds like you're speaking from experience, mate. Are you claiming you're the working from home equivalent of Albert Luque?

Tosh! If someone can respond instantly to something on MSN they can answer the phone or reply to an email. Sounds like an excuse for a bit of browsing during the employers time if you ask me, like. Thieving fuckers, the youth of today. 101063[/snapback] Depends how busy you are. I've got about 120 unread emails in my inbox at the moment and I deal with the oldest one first. If someone at work gets my by MSN I see it straight away and deal with it there and then if required. The amount of downtime following server failures has dramitically reduced since we had MSN installed. The person who needs to know finds out almost instantaneously.... Frightened of change tbh! 101065[/snapback] We're being forced to get it at work. On the contrary to what HTL has said, it means I will be forced to be at my desk when "working from home". Bugger. Craig, are you going to move this thread or what? Lazy bugger. 101067[/snapback] I suggest you read my post again, properly this time.

Tosh! If someone can respond instantly to something on MSN they can answer the phone or reply to an email. Sounds like an excuse for a bit of browsing during the employers time if you ask me, like. Thieving fuckers, the youth of today. 101063[/snapback] Depends how busy you are. I've got about 120 unread emails in my inbox at the moment and I deal with the oldest one first. If someone at work gets my by MSN I see it straight away and deal with it there and then if required. The amount of downtime following server failures has dramitically reduced since we had MSN installed. The person who needs to know finds out almost instantaneously.... Frightened of change tbh! 101065[/snapback] Hmm, if you say so.

Get over it....Bellamy is GONE I was glad when Kluivert scored against Chelsea but it didn't mean I wanted the guy to stay. If we still had Bellamy, we wouldn't have Owen. 100863[/snapback] Why not ? 101051[/snapback] Rather have Bellamy tbh. I see the usual people have never sorted out the truth from the shit they gobbled up from the Souness propaganda machine. The only twáts were Souness and his band of 'yes' men, Bellamy was a top player for us, doing far more for the cause of nufc than that twát Souness. 101054[/snapback] oh god not all this again 101057[/snapback] Sorry like, but it's never failed to amaze me how people who had nowt but praise for Bellamy for ages were so easily turned by the Souness propaganda machine.

Tosh! If someone can respond instantly to something on MSN they can answer the phone or reply to an email. Sounds like an excuse for a bit of browsing during the employers time if you ask me, like. Thieving fuckers, the youth of today.

Cheers mate Do you download anything, and how does it work ? Is it a forum, whats the user age group, can you get spam, viruses or bogus pervs etc etc etc which is mainly what I'm bothered about ???? 101049[/snapback] My kids use it and it drives me mad, great if you want a virus, like. Life was fantastic lately when the thing was duff, downhill immediately when it came back.

Get over it....Bellamy is GONE I was glad when Kluivert scored against Chelsea but it didn't mean I wanted the guy to stay. If we still had Bellamy, we wouldn't have Owen. 100863[/snapback] Why not ? 101051[/snapback] Rather have Bellamy tbh. I see the usual people have never sorted out the truth from the shit they gobbled up from the Souness propaganda machine. The only twáts were Souness and his band of 'yes' men, Bellamy was a top player for us, doing far more for the cause of nufc than that twát Souness.

Aye, agreed.

No we don't. 100609[/snapback] You are happy with his standard of football are you ? 100654[/snapback] The only reason some people say this about him EVERY season is because he has one good game, or scores a goal that he seem to intend, and the knee jerk from people is that he's the replacement for Shearer. Then it sinks in, and it's back to the, "this is donkey's last season in the PL" until his next goal. The fact is, he shouldn't be here, it's been obvious for ages he's crap and it shouldn't need to be said every season. I take it you think he's great 'cos he scored against Barcelona..... No, course you don't. Same as I'm not happy with his standard of football. Daft fúcking question, tbh.

Seriously fookin there like 100625[/snapback] Errr aye, YOU said it, like. Embarrassing tbh.

Well Im no Shepherd hater but (and I cant be arsed to google the names of chairmen so I'll list the clubs). Chelski, ManUre, Liverpool, Boro, Arse, Wigan.... are definites. Add to that list the clubs that never do anything but dont have the cash we have yet at the same time manage to buy players and not make headlines because of the chairmans crass mouth and actions and your left with a list that contains all of the Premiership chairmen minus Murray and Ellis. 100616[/snapback] Don't agree with your definites, for reasons stated earlier by LM. Anyway, I'd guess you weren't saying this kind of thing when we were 4th, 3rd and 5th. Or when FS appointed Dalglish, who had a track record better than Wenger, or when Gullit and Robson were later appointed as well. Good track records, especially Robson. Souness was a mistake and that's why we're in our present state, so Fred has to get it right next time. Here's something else to consider, since you mention Liverpool. I've been slated yesterday by David Kelly and by Dan for suggesting Robson should have been moved on when we finished 3rd. I blame Fred for not recognising that by the way, so I see that as a mistake by Fred. Kelly and Dan have suggested Newcastle fans would have been 'up in arms' had Fred sacked Robson at that time, yet this Liverpool board you think are better sacked a man who had just won them 5 trophies. They sacked him because they knew he could take them no further. Surely therefore the Liverpool board is a shite board, it's obviously a disgrace that they sacked this man who had won them 5 trophies? Surely those who think it would have been so bad had Fred sacked Robson after finishing 3rd can't possibly believe the Liverpool board is a good one after such a disgraceful decision? Unless they accept the notion that what really matters is more to do with getting the right replacement than the actual timing of the sacking, like. Personally, I think this kind of thing shows a board with ambition and vision. Fred is criticised for having no vision, but if he did show the kind of vision shown by the Liverpool board, you fickle lot would all be moaning on and on and on if he made a decision like that one. As I've said, damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. Should be the signature of quite a few on here. Chelsea - A bottomless pit of money and of course, a better manager. Middlesboro - Don't make me laugh. They're shite actually. Arsenal - They just appointed a better manager, who replaced a shite one appointed by the same board. Expectations at Wigan are low. But, he's a decent enough chairman having supported his manager within his resources just like Fred does. Jewell is of course, a better manager than Souness. Manure - More resources and of course, a better manager.

No, thats the managers job to make those decisions 100591[/snapback] I saw this post of Craig's as so dumb it had to be a wind-up. Even Craig isn't capable of this level of stupidity. Gemmill, maybe. 100611[/snapback] Right, I've had jolly well enough of this. Fisticuffs is the only way to resolve this sort of disagreement. 100615[/snapback] 'Offering me out' again, I see. On a forum anarl, you sad bastard. Stop taking yourself so seriously is my advice.