Danny CL

It was cracking before this.

Thinks of new Geordie comic on the scene.....can only come up with "new"? silly boy, back in your box., She was doing Jongleurs round by me 18 months ago so yeah I would say he comedy stardom is relatively new. Seriously, stop it, you're clueless. you might be able to bumble your way around football banter, but you've got no idea what you're talking about. She's been around on the circuit for 6 years. If you want North Eastern Comics that are breaking ground, try Jason Cook or Chris Ramsey, Sarah Millican is fairly well established iyam. Oh and performing at Jongleurs is not a measure of stardom at all, it's one step removed from a fucking corporate gig. Acts hate doing it because it's office parties and stag dos. Nobody is there for the act, they're there to get pissed. Once again you're talking shit Daniel, so why not make a life-style change and stfu My world is in pieces tbh. Plus you completely missed my point. I can just imagine the triumphant pounding at the keyboard now "This chump knows nothing of the north east comedy scene, I will slay him online"

A pest. So what word would describe yourself in relation to this board if Craig's a pest. Reason. Mug I'd say. Yes, you probably would. Or more likely Yooouuurrree a maaaaaggggg saaaaahhhhhn, or whatever you have learned from the latest Danny Dyer movie.

Thinks of new Geordie comic on the scene.....can only come up with "new"? silly boy, back in your box., She was doing Jongleurs round by me 18 months ago so yeah I would say he comedy stardom is relatively new.

A pest. So what word would describe yourself in relation to this board if Craig's a pest. Reason.

Thinks of new Geordie comic on the scene.....can only come up with

A pest.

And what reforms have the tories proposed to put a stop to "toxic" debt? How does cutting public expenditure reduce the amount of sub-prime mortgages, the Alt-A or near prime debt? Public expenditure is the safest least toxic debt there is. Its starts at the bottom and works its way up HF First its some chief selling debt to someone who cant afford it. Then the banks are selling that debt to other banks....guess what that debt goes south. Then the banks need propping up, so governments are borrowing like mad Now we are seeing sovereign default in Europe due to excess debt We need to look at our attitude towards debt on a global scale and look at alternative ways to drive growth.

Point me in the direction of it if you find it? Craig it's a known fact there's a hidden board, if I died tomorrow my legacy to NUFC would be revealing the hidden forums on the two biggest toon forums. I guess I'm not in on it then... Come on Craig, you have proved in the past you are drunk on power. What would make you feel special if you didnt have a little hidey hole for you and your "moderator" friends? You still here? If I was 'drunk on power' you'd be long gone, fu**tard. You've banned me about 5 times Craig, threatened to grass, given out what you thought was my ip (which turned out to belong to someone else) to a non admin member of the board. If that's not being drunk on power I don't know what is. You're a menace man.

To be honest Alex, I'm losing the will to live on this one. I find it staggering that people want to continue building an economy on unsustainable debt levels after a crisis caused by.....unsustainable debt levels nutters Nice analysis - so much wrong in so few words. The irony levels itt are ots coming from STP the king of the soundbite. Why don't you tell me where you think that is wrong and I will pick it to bits for you. Your claim that people want to build an economy built on unsustainable debt is unttrue. Your claim that the crisis was caused by unsustainable debt is wrong What are we going to pay for government spending in a recession with? Magic beans? What do you think started the credit crisis? Toxic debt.

Point me in the direction of it if you find it? Craig it's a known fact there's a hidden board, if I died tomorrow my legacy to NUFC would be revealing the hidden forums on the two biggest toon forums. I guess I'm not in on it then... Come on Craig, you have proved in the past you are drunk on power. What would make you feel special if you didnt have a little hidey hole for you and your "moderator" friends?

To be honest Alex, I'm losing the will to live on this one. I find it staggering that people want to continue building an economy on unsustainable debt levels after a crisis caused by.....unsustainable debt levels nutters Nice analysis - so much wrong in so few words. The irony levels itt are ots coming from STP the king of the soundbite. Why don't you tell me where you think that is wrong and I will pick it to bits for you.

To be honest Alex, I'm losing the will to live on this one. I find it staggering that people want to continue building an economy on unsustainable debt levels after a crisis caused by.....unsustainable debt levels nutters

The thing that makes me laugh HF is that you are prepared to believe the idiotic fantasies of internet conspiracy theorists whilst calling into question the motivations / accuracy of the Financial Times. Typical loony lefty I guess. That's a bit of an about turn isn't it? Just a couple of posts ago you said that social welfare spending and market welfare were inextricably linked. When i say the same thing it's a loony lefty conspiracy. Get your story straight. Are they linked or not? Does the market improve with austerity measures or not? Does the FT prefer immediate austerity measures to improve the market while the public take the burden or an extended stimulus that lessens the public burden but slows market growth? I should imagine they have weighed up the threat of credit rating downgrade against the threat to growth from austerity.

Just the usual rubbish you get on here. Basically, everything America / Israel do is an evil conspiracy.....everything bad that happens is down to them / capitalism and other such repetitive b0ll0x.

The thing that makes me laugh HF is that you are prepared to believe the idiotic fantasies of internet conspiracy theorists whilst calling into question the motivations / accuracy of the Financial Times. Typical loony lefty I guess.

I'm sure each authority would try to do the same to get whats best for there area. Boris is right though. Return on investment in London will be proportionately larger than in other areas.

I could real off names but they are easy enough to find on google so it would prove nothing.

What do you think motivates the FT and it's readers? Overall social welfare or listed companies stock prices? The two are intrinsically linked. But if it came to tough decisions, which would they prioritise? I would like to think they would give a balanced view based on the data.

What do you think motivates the FT and it's readers? Overall social welfare or listed companies stock prices? The two are intrinsically linked.

Adjustment for economic growth. As the economy grows (which it did massively under NL), of course we spend more on public services. Inflation is not the same as growth is it? Cant you see that growth was artificially caused by overspending? There fore adjusting for that growth is a totally artificial thing to do. If your quality of life is adjusted by how much you've f**ked onto a credit card the graph would be pretty flat, don't you agree? Marvelous - about 5 minutes in and your comparing one of the biggest economies of the world to somebody using a credit card/ The same principles apply. Every analyst you talk to will tell you the same. Every analyst you talk to. The only time you'll talk to analysts is when they ring up for their Sony Ericsson upgrade. You need some new material undercut boy. Tell me which analysts you talk to. Maybe if you read the FT once in a while rather than your copy of razzle you will see what said analysts are saying.

Adjustment for economic growth. As the economy grows (which it did massively under NL), of course we spend more on public services. Inflation is not the same as growth is it? Cant you see that growth was artificially caused by overspending? There fore adjusting for that growth is a totally artificial thing to do. If your quality of life is adjusted by how much you've f**ked onto a credit card the graph would be pretty flat, don't you agree? Marvelous - about 5 minutes in and your comparing one of the biggest economies of the world to somebody using a credit card/ The same principles apply. Every analyst you talk to will tell you the same. Every analyst you talk to. The only time you'll talk to analysts is when they ring up for their Sony Ericsson upgrade. You need some new material undercut boy.

Without any data / reasoning to backup any any of these empty insults that are getting thrown around your arguments appear pretty flimsy boys I'm afraid.

And rightly so. Reward those who contribute the most to this country (board)

Adjustment for economic growth. As the economy grows (which it did massively under NL), of course we spend more on public services. Inflation is not the same as growth is it? Cant you see that growth was artificially caused by overspending? There fore adjusting for that growth is a totally artificial thing to do. If your quality of life is adjusted by how much you've f**ked onto a credit card the graph would be pretty flat, don't you agree? Marvelous - about 5 minutes in and your comparing one of the biggest economies of the world to somebody using a credit card/ The same principles apply. Every analyst you talk to will tell you the same. Surely you would need to factor in an increased salary analogous to increased tax revenues from a booming economy? Not if you are constantly plowing that money directly back into the public sector. Unlying private sector growth would have be much flatter than the economy as a whole.