Jump to content

Rayvin

Moderators
  • Posts

    20760
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

Everything posted by Rayvin

  1. I reckon if it's up to a year we just take the hit and crack on. If he really is meant to be some sort of Bruno replacement that we seized upon because he was cheap then it might all more or less work out anyway. My concern would be that he starts agitating for a move back to Milan as soon as his ban is over but I suppose we have to hope this isn't as 'managed' a situation on their end as this appears. The Athletic article suggests Howe is firmly behind him at the moment so hopefully there's no disharmony about it,
  2. Tonali could be in for a longer ban than Fagioli because the latter didn't bet on games he was involved in. NUFC have little material recourse in terms of what we can do with the player short of sacking him, which is both rare and fairly damaging to finances. NUFC have little material recourse in terms of suing Milan although it is possible if we feel that we can demonstrate that they knew. So essentially, however unfair this is, we have to own it.
  3. Sorry I wasn't really talking about Corbyn actually, I should have clarified. I looked at Corbyn's twitter feed and it's entirely Palestine focused other than one tweet right at the start which splits it both ways. I think that indicates he feels he's unable (or is unwilling) to express any support for Israel at all which I fundamentally disagree with. Israel fully deserved compassion and support for what happened to them in a manner that should have been expressed entirely independently from the need to acknowledge the suffering of Palestinians. I was talking more about the general sense that the media and certain sides of the debate have run off with this hospital thing because they want Israel to be the villains - and that will be true (I'm going to stress that I actually reserved judgment on it but that's largely because by the time I was aware of it, doubts were already being surfaced) - but the same definitely does happen the other way too. We are all caught in a propaganda war on this and it's really hard to know what to make of it. Reddit is awash with videos of absolutely horrifying scenes at the moment but I find it interesting that these videos are so well made, often with English descriptions of what is unfolding which naturally could be completely removed from reality. I think my views on this whole situation are fairly clear but I am wary of believing everything I'm seeing in all senses now.
  4. We saw similar right at the start of this with the beheading babies narrative too tbf. People swallowed that whole and it's still doing the rounds despite Israel having now stated they have no evidence of it. Everyone leans in on their bias - having said that, hospitals getting hit in campaigns like this isn't unheard of. I recall the Americans hitting Red Cross hospital in Iraq while that was going on - so in that sense I suppose it is easily believable.
  5. That doesn't mean it's not what the Arab world is thinking he might do though. Jordan may well have looked at the way this is going and concluded that he would.
  6. In this situation you would expect at minimum that he would let the club know exactly what was going on, what the deal was, so that they could prepare for it. The fact he has failed to do this is really concerning and I would imagine we have to throw the book at him here tbh.
  7. I would imagine the view will be that if they start taking refugees, Israel pushes harder to kick all Arab peoples out of Palestine and then locks the door behind them.
  8. This story has been some fucking rollercoaster Swings from one extreme to the other every 12 hours.
  9. To be clear, I'm not even "judging" Israeli people for this - I see how they get to this point and I don't doubt for a second that Britain would be sliding the same way under similar circumstances - I'd like to think I wouldn't be, but hell, who knows. I'm really just saying that I'm struggling to see how they get to a more moderate approach from here on their side. The flip side of that is that it's exactly the same for the Palestinians.
  10. This guy is amazing and really sums up for me the fucked up thinking of some of the response to this.
  11. I only actual reference that as relevant because it suggests that even moderate opinion in Israel is turning pro apartheid. This doesn't suggest that things get better if Netanyahu is removed.
  12. https://www.timesofisrael.com/plurality-of-jewish-israelis-want-to-expel-arabs-study-shows/ Almost half of Israelis want to expel Arabs full stop from Israel occupied territories. 79% believe Arabs should be second class citizens if they do remain. A significant number of these people identify as centrist. This continues to feel like it's not a religious conflict to me.
  13. Is the point to play stuff together? If it is, in this day and age you need two different setups really.
  14. I think we've moved off to the side a bit here with this now being a more general attack on the left rather than a focus on extremist violence. I assume you do acknowledge that extremist violence is a largely right wing phenomenon. As for what you've outlined, I think a lot of cancelling goes both ways personally - the right do all the same things they're just not as technologically savvy at the grassroots so tend to be less effective with it. Both sides try to shut each other down. Antifa was branded a terrorist organization if I recall? The police dragged off anti-monarchists during the coronation/funeral proceedings of the royals. Right wing US states are targeting CRT and other academic considerations in their overhaul of the education system. Moralising clampdowns on trans people, etc. Whether you agree with the US authorities in their approach to each case or not, we would have to acknowledge that they are censoring/cancelling things that most people would deem to be left wing. The difference tends to be, IMO, that the right is in power and so can cancel things officially. The actual/moderate left is never in power, so has to work from grassroots. The extent of the damage Trump has done really depends on your other political priorities and worldview, so while I acknowledge what you've outlined in your case for him, I do not agree that he was infinitely less dangerous simply because he sped up American hegemonic decline and created a power vacuum that has led to the widespread destabilisation of the geopolitical order. See also Brexit, but localised to Europe/Russia. From an internationalist outlook (mine), Trump was a disaster.
  15. I agree that communism is left wing extremism, but I am just indicating that in the past 10 years there are an incredibly small number of left wing extremist killings. That will include anyone of a communist slant. The evidence just isn't there that the left are the dangerous ones in the present conversation. Radical islam isn't tolerated by anyone - the left will rally around Muslims in defence of them against islamophobia, and it will point to islamic terrorism being a consequence of our own failed foreign policy, but that's it. Current right wing extremism has more in common with radical islam than the left does IMO - they are brothers in arms of dealing with women and trans people for instance. Andrew Tate has a very significant following amongst young Asian men.
  16. I don't have kids so I can't talk to this from a position of any experience, but I am very close to someone who grew up with a condition called selective mutism - sort of a social anxiety driven condition that makes it very difficult for children to communicate in situations where they are not comfortable. I'm not saying that's what this is, but there are some parallels in what you've described versus what this person has explained to me. I would suggest at the very least bringing a child therapist into the conversation just to rule out this being anything other than a phase. It could be that it's nothing of the sort, but from what I have seen of the damage these sort of social limitation issues can cause, it might be worth just getting a view from someone in the know.
  17. How often, really, are the left wing of politics 'in this day and age' involved in actually killing anyone? I can think of several right wing killers but I always seem to come up short on anyone being killed by Antifa, or by communists, or whatever. From the ADL: https://www.adl.org/resources/report/murder-and-extremism-united-states-2022 Left wing extremism makes up 4% of extremism related deaths since 2013. The right, to no one's surprise at all, makes up 75%. Islamists take the remainder. I don't think jokes by left wingers are as big a threat as hysteria and misinformation from the right.
  18. I think you're doing very well all things considered mate in what must be an absolutely horrifying time on a personal level and for which I genuinely do feel for you and your family. I don't think the conclusion that we can't or shouldn't discuss it would be just about you - as said, I don't feel able to engage with any of it properly even just on my own end. Anyway I just wanted to acknowledge that I'm personally open to that outcome if that's the way everyone feels on it in the end.
  19. I've stopped engaging in this as of a few days ago because I don't believe that it is actually possible to properly discuss it here, but I don't think you should be shaming people over debate in a topic that was opened specifically for them to do so. I think so far everyone has conducted themselves very well and with a significant amount of restraint and compassion over an issue that genuinely does seem to cut across political lines - especially compared to what I've seen from the same conversation in other communities. I think the alternative would be to close the thread.
  20. It does sound like this is probably a big enough deal to have been really bothering him. Maybe he was told that he'd probably have his playing career in Italy interfered if he stayed.
  21. Fascist remark aside, all I saw from him there was a man who knew that the order to 1.1m people to relocate in 24 hours was an abominable action, who knew that he and his government should have opposed it, but who was too weak and lacking in leadership to do so - consequently just hedging the question in the standard politician way until the timer for the interview ran out. He ran away and hid and we should not take him seriously as a politician, a leader or even a fucking man.
  22. Reform UK up to 8% is interesting there mind. Almost on par with the LDs.
  23. So I'm going to be honest here and say my interpretation of 'betting on cards' is poker. I assume it's not that though because I don't see why they would need to 'admit' it - so what is meant by that phrase?
  24. That would be the ideal outcome for us, but I'm not sure exactly how it works if it is indeed a criminal situation.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.