wolfy

Well ok, that's a little bit more kinky but if that's how you prefer to imagine me, then who am I to stop you getting your rocks off....ROCKY.

I am open minded,as I said before....I started off believing everything that was officially told and never even thought to question it....for many many years I did that until I saw things that just didn't make sense and defies logic. A for instance, the silly struts holding the shuttle and the big rusty tank together all balanced on 2 outer rockets......For anyone to tell me that this shuttle can actually stay upright and also take off, attaining 17,000 mph without these things falling apart, just makes me laugh. I don't need a science degree of an engineering degree to know that the shuttle is as fake as all the other shite they pretend to put into space. All anyone has to do is look at it all and think of the supposed weight bearing down on those struts and that's all you should need to convince you that the shuttle is a big fake. there are many many more things wrong about it all but that's a major point. This is why I question things. The moon landings are easily questioned and look to be exactly what they are ...FAKES.... not only I believe they are fakes...millions of other people know there something fishy about it all. If you can fake one thing, you can fake two and three and hundreds, if you have a gullible public that prefers to go with the flow and question nothing. Once you see anomalies with anything , you then open your mind to the possibilities of other anomalies with many other things and it spirals from there and wakes you up to what's going on......or in many cases, it doesn't wake you up as most people prefer not to even question things, which is fair enough. There's 3 categories of people where stuff like this is concerned. 1. Those who don't care about news and prefer to just go about life doing what they do. 2. Those who hang onto every news story and discuss it all as gospel and not wavering in their trust of what they see or hear. 3. Then there's the likes of me that sees stuff and takes a step back to get the bigger picture and question it before I make my mind up whether it's real life true as spoken or an attempt to dupe the public into believing something by faking an event for whatever gain is required, which could be money, war, scare tactics e.t.c. Now space travel as far as I'm concerned has never been conquered and I do not believe there is one scrap of tin in space that has been put up there by us humans. Can I directly prove what I'm saying? The answer is , no, I can't because I have no access to verifiable proof just as nobody else has access to verifiable proof of the opposite, regardless of what they say. I'm a very very sceptical person with many many things that are spun to us in the news and what we are taught to accept ..but I wasn't always like this, as I said. I'm in a minority as far as questioning events goes but only as far as putting my views forward. I'm probably more in the half and half bracket as far as sceptics go, it's just that many sceptics would rather sit and agree with their minds and not their mouths or typing fingers for fear of being ridiculed. Luckily I don't hold that fear, so I say what I think.

Equally, you cannot back up your claims, other than to go with what you have been conditioned to believe, so it's a bit of a stalemate here whether you like that or not.

Do you challenge those that believe in God?

That's just the point. I cannot back up what I say as far as space is concerned no more than the top egg heads can genuinely back up what they say. Except, they have the ball in their court and can push it out as true because of their status.I'm a mere mortal giving an alternative to what's given out and it's as simple as that.

You believe what you want to believe. I prefer my belief 100%.

I've said space is neither hot nor cold because it's a vacuum and a void...it is EMPTY. If you want hot or cold, then you have to fill it ...but with what?

I've supported it. Accept it or don't.

If he was unbanned , you could have the benefit of his input.

That word....."proof" ...It's a great word and is brilliant when applied to Earthly objects , yet it absolutely silly to actually prove it all without sampling the delights of an outer space excursion to once and for all prove what the vacuum of space really gives out.. I don't know for sure....you don't know for sure.. and the tefal heads who make this shit up, haven't a scooby, so where does that really leave us all.

Aye he did but he did say I was more like a cheap stick of Blackpool rock compared with Rentons Mcdonalds straw...I don;t know what he meant by that as I'm naive.

That's just the issue though isn't it. The only thing the smartest people on the planet know about the universe is what they make up because none of them...and I do mean none of them know jack shit about the universe. Astronomers know star configurations which is basically a view through eye or telescope which we could all do if that's what interested us but they know jack shit about the universe. Sure, they can predict a comet coming back round and meteors shooting in the sky but they know jack skippety bungle pants about the universe. Some boffins say the universe was made from..........wait for it..............................NOTHING. Clever people aren't they.

Ermmmm...nah, I don't think so.

I also lack a decent sized penis but I get by.

The burden of proof is not on me, I'm happy in the knowledge that space is neither hot nor cold.

Aye, I'm not bad for stuff like that.

Yep, for engineering and various other calculations, I sure do. Not for space though.

Well, it looks like you aren't willing to agree to just disagree. So, onwards we go.Space is neither hot nor cold.

Let's just agree to disagree on this because none of us is going to change our stance.

So on Earth we have the agitation of particles acting in an atmosphere and the less agitated, the colder it gets, which is fine and as you say, basically there is no cold, it's just less warmth. In space, there is NO temperature at all, it's a nothing. On Earth, the colder it gets the more icy it would become. We do not see space like a sheet of ice because it is devoid of any particles, which as you rightly say on Earth would render it freezing or shall I say extremely less warmer. Space holds none of that although you can argue that, " there you go, no particles= minus 270, yet although it appears to be fair game, the truth is, space in itself is , let's say, without temperature. I know you are 100% in disagreement but that's my stance and it's simply a scientific spin that's made it what it is.

We know what heat is, now what is cold?

Because it's devoid of anything that can sustain a temperature, hot or cold. It's nothing.Trying to get your head round it using agitated particles is the effect on Earth which like I said, is nothing to do with the vacuum of space.

Nah, I don't think so.

Thanks for pointing out my typo, I appreciate that.

You are correct, there cannot be heat and also there cannot be cold. You are still thinking Earthly. Like I said, I don't expect you to grasp that. I love the idiot boy thing, use it in every post, it makes you appear really superior.