wolfy

You are not opening your mid, you are asking me a question about when I became enlightened and how old am I , and I am refusing to answer the question. It's as simple as that.

It's you that doesn't understand.You are simply going by Earth values, in that if it's not hot, it's cold "on your own body"... Space in itself being devoid of anything, is neither hot nor cold. You cannot grasp that because you are thinking of your own body and how it gets cold or you are thinking of atmospheric cold. It's ok though.

No Fish. The absence of particles is the absence of heat or cold. Space is a vacuum where up and down, side to side and hot and cold are absent.

No logic in that whatsoever.Without sufficient particles in space it is neither hot nor cold...now that's logic.

That's classified.

No. I'm a thick bastard remember.

When some bastard set my trousers alight.

Yes I know what you said, I'm just wondering how you equate this to space being cold.

It's more of a giggle really Fish.

So what are they supposed to mean?

I enjoy laughing at you when you try and point out stuff that's basically wrong.

And what would they be?

Space is neither hot nor cold.

Aye, I wonder who's thick eh.

Oh you're dumbing down mighty fine.Space my dear friend is neither hot nor cold.

Space itself is neither hot nor cold.

Both.

I think it proves you don;t know what you're talking about. I'm talking about the small room with a heater in, as in the inside of the satellite not outside. Also, the satellite turning away from the sun to cool down is laughable in the extreme. Space is neither hot nor cold, so what's to cool down? You are correct about the sun though hitting the satellite( if there was one in space, which there isn't) because the sun would basically render the components inside it, toast anyway, just like cooking a Turkey in foil in an oven. Trying to be smart does not make you smart Fish.

You need to try and understand that you are going round in circles.

There are no parameters that would keep a satellite functioning in the vacuum of space because there is no AIR around the components to move the heat, therefore the heat , for want of a better word stays around the component. Basically it's too slow to radiate it's heat. The best way I can explain is to imagine standing in a tiny room with all windows closed with your electric fire on. Soon enough you will get warm and then warmer and then so warm that you start dehydrating until you eventually collapse due to the heat build up that is only cooling down a fraction at a time. If you opened a door, then your heat would vent out. You don't have that luxury in space.

Again, you are asking the same question and I'll give you the same answer. just look above your post.

The operative word you used is "IF"

Once again, I said they would radiate heat into space but only the space around the actual component as there is no fan or mechanism that can push it away.Like I said, take a look at your own computer and switch off your fan and see how long your components last before over heating and burning out. And that's in an atmosphere not a vacuum.

The distance has a lot to do with what I'm talking about when it concerns planets and stars and the distances we are told they are in space.My argument is, they are simply best guessing and have no clue because there is no way the distance can be measured for ANY planet or moon for that matter.

I said they would radiate heat, I just said it would be radiated around it's own components and would radiate so slowly it would burn them out.