ChocChip
-
Posts
547 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by ChocChip
-
-
It's been getting a bit bitchy on here lately
I've finally found 'the other forum' people on here kept refering to, jesus it's juvenile. I would hate to see this place going the same way.
Maybe i need to post more 'Nation of Islam' properganda so you can all find something you hate more than each other
Is that the stuff Souness gets Alan Oliver to write in the Evening Chronicle?
It's funny, i thought i'd spelt that wrong but it did strike me as a good 'Souness' word too
-
It's been getting a bit bitchy on here lately
I've finally found 'the other forum' people on here kept refering to, jesus it's juvenile. I would hate to see this place going the same way.
Maybe i need to post more 'Nation of Islam' properganda so you can all find something you hate more than each other
-
Judging by their quoted remarks after the event i'll jump to that conclusion quite happily.
-
Maybe if we get beat 0-4 by Everton we'll be linked with Ronaldinho, Buffon and Rosicky
-
I love it, we can't afford Viduka so we're after Joaquin and Baraja instead
-
Why does it say on the link that 'the motives were unclear'?
It's not taking me long to think of the reason.......
-
Hughes would have done f**k all on Saturday and Robert would have done his best to give the ball away just as our fullbacks got into promising positions thus giving the opposition the perfect opportunity to counter-attack AGAIN.
If Shearer had played up front on his own he would have done no better than Ameobi.
Owen would have given their defence something to worry about. As for Luque, they probably know as little about him as we do so he could have at least surprised them.
-
No links but my sincerest condolences. Keep your chin up bro'.
-
Well i take this opportunity seriously to promote my new Nation of Islam NUFC Chapter.
I aim to nominate Renton as my Scientific Theologian who prove beyond doubt that the following is true:
Chocchip Muhammad teaches his followers that, first, the moon separated from the earth. Then, the first humans, Original Man, were a Black people. They founded the Holy City Mecca.
Among this black race were 24 wise scientists. One of the scientists, at odds with the rest, created the especially strong Black tribe of Shabazz, from which America's Negroes, so-called, descend.
About 6600 years ago, when 70 percent of the people were satisfied, and 30 percent were dissatisfied, among the dissatisfied was born a "Mr.Yacub." He was born to create trouble, to break the peace, and to kill. His head was unusually large. When he was four years old, he began school. At the age 18, Yacub had finished all of his nations colleges and universities. He was known as "the big head scientist." Among many other things, he had learned how to breed races scientifically.
The big head scientist, Mr. Yacub, began preaching in the streets of Mecca, making such host of converts that the authorities, increasingly concerned, finally exiled him with 59,999 followers to the island of Patmos-described in the Bible as I were John received the message contained in Revelation in the New Testament. Though he was a Black man, Mr. Yacub, embittered toward Allah now, decided, as revenge, to create upon the earth a devil race-a bleached out, white race of people.
On the island of Patmos was nothing but these blond, pale skinned, cold blue-eyed devil's-savages, nude and shameless; hairy, like animals, they walked on all fours and they lived in trees.
God:
God\Allah is and always has been a man who came to earth as a half white half Black man by the name of Wallace D. Fard Muhammad.[8]
Endtimes:
Chocchip Muhammed teaches that the earth will come to an end when a spaceship, also called the "Mother Plane", releases its 1500 flying saucer like airplanes equipped with special bombs. The prophet Ezekiel spoke of the "Mother Plane" as "a great wheel". The mother plane, which is actually a spaceship, has the ability to hover 40 miles over the earth. The mother plane itself measures 1/2 mile by 1/2-mile square and can be seen twice a week. The special bombs have the ability to burrow one mile into the earth. These bombs will cause a fire that will last for several months. In this way the white race will be destroyed.[27]
In a familiar prediction Chochip Muhammad taught that only 144,000 NOI members would be spared the tribulation above.[28]
-
I love the tabloids.
-
...........er, anyway.
I still think 4-1-4-1 might work becasue Dyer's instinct will always be to push up and if Luque is the attacking left sided forward he's said to be, he'll push up too thus Owen having plenty of support. Then Solano tucks in, as he has been doing, and before you know it we've got a 4-3-3 or 4-1-2-2-1 if you're being pedantic.
Just trying to think of ways to play without Shearer or Ameobi.
I don't think formations matter too much, just quality players managed well by a quality manager. Apart from 3 at the back, which is cack.
Wasn't that employed by the great Dutch teams, and West Germany to great effect?
Aye, but they don't play in the English Premier League. I don't think any team has won the league championship or either of the cup competitions in England using 3 at the back, certainly not the league championship. I may be wrong, but I'd be interested if someone can mention a team that has.
As I understand it, in Germany 3 at the back is employed as routine through all levels of football, just as 4 at the back is in England. So, through childhood to turning pro', lads throughout a team are used to the 3 at the back system in Germany, but for English players it's a completely different way of playing, and not just for the defenders either.
I don't think it's easy for players, even though they are pro's, to adjust to the different requirements of that system. Hence it doesn't work over here and never has really. Do you have an example of a successful team in England using that system?
Well, the best i can come up with is Leicester under O'Neill. Hardly a good start though they did win a cup. Otherwise i can only think of Spurs plummeting under Hoddle. Not much of an advertisement........
-
...........er, anyway.
I still think 4-1-4-1 might work becasue Dyer's instinct will always be to push up and if Luque is the attacking left sided forward he's said to be, he'll push up too thus Owen having plenty of support. Then Solano tucks in, as he has been doing, and before you know it we've got a 4-3-3 or 4-1-2-2-1 if you're being pedantic.
Just trying to think of ways to play without Shearer or Ameobi.
I don't think formations matter too much, just quality players managed well by a quality manager. Apart from 3 at the back, which is cack.
Wasn't that employed by the great Dutch teams, and West Germany to great effect?
-
So that, after the game, when they're sailing peacefully across the Channel and away from the action, we don't fire on them and sink their boat
-
...........er, anyway.
I still think 4-1-4-1 might work becasue Dyer's instinct will always be to push up and if Luque is the attacking left sided forward he's said to be, he'll push up too thus Owen having plenty of support. Then Solano tucks in, as he has been doing, and before you know it we've got a 4-3-3 or 4-1-2-2-1 if you're being pedantic.
Just trying to think of ways to play without Shearer or Ameobi.
-
How many theories throughout history have been accepted as fact only to be destroyed by a new body of evidence. Every age believes that it's version of events is the truth and that which went before was a simple view based on the limited evidence and means of perception. In 500 years from now who's to say that your view and mine maybe regarding as nothing more than understandable but flawed overly simple or overly complicated view of reality, which in fact bears little or no resemblence to what they believe now....er....then...whatever, you know what i mean.
What does you intuition tell you? Listen to your soul, your spirit and sure enough the teachings of Elijah Muhammed will begin to have resonance with you and you will realise you are nothing but evil creations of Yacub................wait, look, it's THE MOTHERSHIP.
I don't know how to take you....
Your first point is interesting, but essentially wrong I think. Of course, a few hundred years ago people got many things totally wrong (e.g. sun orbitting the earth). However, now it is the 21st century, science has become very advanced, and things are almost never proven to be fundamentally flawed. Evolution does exist, anyone who has studied it knows it is almost an irrefutable truth. The devil is in the detail, such as the exact mechanims, but essentially we know we have evolved from more "primitive" life forms. 500 years is not going to change that.
If you're going to take me anywhere, the cinema or the circus is fine and if you don't know how, a car is fine
Your point is possibly/probably correct, science seems to have moved on at an incredlble rate over just a few hundred years. Can it be said it won't continue to evolve at the same rate for the next 200? If it does, what will they think of current thought? Moot point from me really, maybe not helpful in this discussion as it's utterly unquantifiable. Sorry.
For the most part though I'd say 'science' (as we understand it) hasnt suffered that many major discreditings in recent history. More its been a case of gradual understanding and development-and even where there have been mistakes, the mistakes themselves have been what future generations have learned from. So in a way even the mistakes are valid (or have a purpose).
2 words for you MM, 'cheese' & 'moon' i rest my case
Manc Mag may have completely different meanings for those two words.
-
Your point is possibly/probably correct, science seems to have moved on at an incredlble rate over just a few hundred years. Can it be said it won't continue to evolve at the same rate for the next 200? If it does, what will they think of current thought? Moot point from me really, maybe not helpful in this discussion as it's utterly unquantifiable . Sorry.
Like religious beliefs
Quite simply, you're not worthy of his grace so you kick about in the pit of eternal ignorance
I'm not worthy of anyone's grace
Not even 'Grace' by Jeff Buckley? Beautiful album, but maybe your ears are too full of the evil Dr Yacub's words of oppression and brutal dominion over the righteous to hear it
-
How many theories throughout history have been accepted as fact only to be destroyed by a new body of evidence. Every age believes that it's version of events is the truth and that which went before was a simple view based on the limited evidence and means of perception. In 500 years from now who's to say that your view and mine maybe regarding as nothing more than understandable but flawed overly simple or overly complicated view of reality, which in fact bears little or no resemblence to what they believe now....er....then...whatever, you know what i mean.
What does you intuition tell you? Listen to your soul, your spirit and sure enough the teachings of Elijah Muhammed will begin to have resonance with you and you will realise you are nothing but evil creations of Yacub................wait, look, it's THE MOTHERSHIP.
I don't know how to take you....
Your first point is interesting, but essentially wrong I think. Of course, a few hundred years ago people got many things totally wrong (e.g. sun orbitting the earth). However, now it is the 21st century, science has become very advanced, and things are almost never proven to be fundamentally flawed. Evolution does exist, anyone who has studied it knows it is almost an irrefutable truth. The devil is in the detail, such as the exact mechanims, but essentially we know we have evolved from more "primitive" life forms. 500 years is not going to change that.
If you're going to take me anywhere, the cinema or the circus is fine and if you don't know how, a car is fine
Your point is possibly/probably correct, science seems to have moved on at an incredlble rate over just a few hundred years. Can it be said it won't continue to evolve at the same rate for the next 200? If it does, what will they think of current thought? Moot point from me really, maybe not helpful in this discussion as it's utterly unquantifiable. Sorry.
For the most part though I'd say 'science' (as we understand it) hasnt suffered that many major discreditings in recent history. More its been a case of gradual understanding and development-and even where there have been mistakes, the mistakes themselves have been what future generations have learned from. So in a way even the mistakes are valid (or have a purpose).
2 words for you MM, 'cheese' & 'moon' i rest my case
-
Your point is possibly/probably correct, science seems to have moved on at an incredlble rate over just a few hundred years. Can it be said it won't continue to evolve at the same rate for the next 200? If it does, what will they think of current thought? Moot point from me really, maybe not helpful in this discussion as it's utterly unquantifiable . Sorry.
Like religious beliefs
Quite simply, you're not worthy of his grace so you kick about in the pit of eternal ignorance
-
About 600 AD I think.
Anyway, if that's the case (in bold) shouldn't the Nation of Islam have come up with a name of their own.
So is CC a nation of Islam believer then? Becuase frankly, they sound like a bunch of racist nutters? Or have I been super-whooshed?
Please, please, please credit me with some intelligence. I thought you might be amused by it and who knows, maybe the sheer force of their arguement may have brougth about some kind of 'Road to Damascus/Darlington' vision and you might then become a God-botherer.......
-
How many theories throughout history have been accepted as fact only to be destroyed by a new body of evidence. Every age believes that it's version of events is the truth and that which went before was a simple view based on the limited evidence and means of perception. In 500 years from now who's to say that your view and mine maybe regarding as nothing more than understandable but flawed overly simple or overly complicated view of reality, which in fact bears little or no resemblence to what they believe now....er....then...whatever, you know what i mean.
What does you intuition tell you? Listen to your soul, your spirit and sure enough the teachings of Elijah Muhammed will begin to have resonance with you and you will realise you are nothing but evil creations of Yacub................wait, look, it's THE MOTHERSHIP.
I don't know how to take you....
Your first point is interesting, but essentially wrong I think. Of course, a few hundred years ago people got many things totally wrong (e.g. sun orbitting the earth). However, now it is the 21st century, science has become very advanced, and things are almost never proven to be fundamentally flawed. Evolution does exist, anyone who has studied it knows it is almost an irrefutable truth. The devil is in the detail, such as the exact mechanims, but essentially we know we have evolved from more "primitive" life forms. 500 years is not going to change that.
If you're going to take me anywhere, the cinema or the circus is fine and if you don't know how, a car is fine
Your point is possibly/probably correct, science seems to have moved on at an incredlble rate over just a few hundred years. Can it be said it won't continue to evolve at the same rate for the next 200? If it does, what will they think of current thought? Moot point from me really, maybe not helpful in this discussion as it's utterly unquantifiable. Sorry.
-
That Louis Faraqhan (sp?) is a bit of a twat like, though you've gotta dig those little bow ties. Very dapper.
I think they look f**king stupid and then i have to listen to them. Jesus, you white people got it easy man, they won't stopping you at the train station i can promise
-
-
I think Islam dates from about 500 AD. There is Huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge gap between Nation of Islam theology and Classical Islam though, i wouldn't even class them as the same belief system tbqph.
Anyway, the Arabs got the oil so God loves them more i reckon
-
How many theories throughout history have been accepted as fact only to be destroyed by a new body of evidence. Every age believes that it's version of events is the truth and that which went before was a simple view based on the limited evidence and means of perception. In 500 years from now who's to say that your view and mine maybe regarding as nothing more than understandable but flawed overly simple or overly complicated view of reality, which in fact bears little or no resemblence to what they believe now....er....then...whatever, you know what i mean.
What does you intuition tell you? Listen to your soul, your spirit and sure enough the teachings of Elijah Muhammed will begin to have resonance with you and you will realise you are nothing but evil creations of Yacub................wait, look, it's THE MOTHERSHIP.
Enter Luque?
in Newcastle Forum
Posted
Right, i warned you!
"About 6600 years ago, when 70% of the people were satisfied, and 30% were dissatisfied, a Mr. Yakub was born. He was born to create trouble, to break the peace, and to kill. His head was unusually large. When he was four years old, he began school. At the age of eighteen, Yakub had finished all of his nation's colleges and universities. He was known as 'the big head scientist.' Among many other things, he had learned how to breed races scientifically. This big head scientist, Mr. Yakub, began preaching in the streets of Mecca, making such hosts of converts that the authorities, increasingly concerned, finally exiled him with 59,999 followers to the isle of Patmos. Though he was a black man, Mr. Yakub, embittered toward Allah now, decided, as revenge, to create upon the earth a devil race--a bleached out, white race of people. From his studies, the big head scientist knew that black men contained two germs, black and brown. He knew that the brown germ stayed dormant as, being the lighter of the two germs, it was the weaker. Mr. Yakub, to upset the law of nature, separated the black and brown germs, and then grafted the brown germ to progressively weaker and lighter brown germs. Others, assistants, were trained by Mr. Yakub to continue with the breeding program after he died. Mr. Yakub, when he died on the island of Patmos at the age of 152, had left laws and rules for his assistants to follow. After 600 years of breeding there was nothing on the island of Patmos but these blond, pale-skinned, cold-blue-eyed devils--savages, nude and shameless; hairy, like animals, they walked on all fours and lived in trees."