McFaul

The state of the guy in the suit in the bottom right corner. He's just been to court anyway by the looks of him.

50% my arse.

He'll be alright once he's seen the training ground

For once I would love to see Paul Wyn's take on this but the cunt has me blocked.

Lies. Professional tac dealers aye.

Best picture of this or any other day to be honest.

Whats funny about that? Two pennies to rub together surely. If you've just got one penny what you going to rub it against???

5pm thoughts POSTPONED - got some unexpected invoice paper work to do never a bad thing.

I'll be amazed if Leicester doesn't go up, Nottingham was an absolute nailed on waiting to happen incident given the profile of the population. Don't think Bradford will though.

You're part of the wider problem we have on these islands Kevin. You've left school with 8 GCSE's and you're thick as fuck. Show me where I have been racist so far.

You don't think they maybe just fancy a tear-up with some black chaps? the thought had crossed my mind like. "We dittun win free wewwd wawaz fa these faakin caants to tykk owvah, lets av it, oo wants it?!?!?"

Heard some Turkish and Asian communities had been taking matters into their own hands too. Good for them. Aye fair play to the muslims even in Plaistow 400 mob of them protecting their businesses waiting for the black mob to start.

Fair play to the Millwall fans and their firm guarding shops in Deptford and Bermondsey

PM me it Stevie and I'll let you know. I'll give you it at 5pm. I'll get a "good post" off LeazesMag, and a "you'll never change" off Renton, LuckyLuke and J69. Pointless really, but I'll post it.

No one is suggesting it's racially motivated, but the fact is at least 4/5ths of these people are black regardless how many lies people want to tell. My question is why are 80% of the people who involved in these attacks from just 20% of the London population. You will all squirm because there is no comfortable answer to give. I honestly don't know Stevie, which you could say is a cop-out. Fair enough if you have an answer you don't want to give but you can't turn around and argue you can't say what you think on here, when you clearly can. If you don't want to say it, then why? I won't say it because there are so many arseholes ready to call the race card, even though my views are practical and honest.

No one is suggesting it's racially motivated, but the fact is at least 4/5ths of these people are black regardless how many lies people want to tell. My question is why are 80% of the people who involved in these attacks from just 20% of the London population. You will all squirm because there is no comfortable answer to give.

Say nee more.

The one in London I've heard a lot by proper east enders, is the owld folk n spoons, and also for Asians I've heard the phrase "Arrigo's" a few times. All wrong imo, but like I say questions need to be asked, without people like HF squirming with defensive stand points. Answering a question with a question shows signs of trying to take the power back, because someone doesn't like the question, I do it all the time in my job.

:lol: pmsl

Every paedophile I've seen exposed was white We shouldn't be afraid to confront that fact. It's like saying if I burned your house down that we shouldn't be afraid to talk about HIV rates in Blackpool & Fylde. Typically irrelevant annoying pish from you. OK, let's stick to the black topic. Why do you think it's a black problem? You don't answer a question with a question pal. Answer my initial question. Your answer will be shit but I'm interested in hearing it.

Every paedophile I've seen exposed was white We shouldn't be afraid to confront that fact. It's like saying if I burned your house down that we shouldn't be afraid to talk about HIV rates in Blackpool & Fylde. Typically irrelevant annoying pish from you.

You would've thought that would have given the police a few hours respite.

we've all seen for ourselves that the white folk have been involved too. Can't blame kay Burley for pulling him up on it. And he's far too little to be called big jim anyway It's the thought process I'm criticising. It's not about race in the orthodox sense but that a man can't report a factual event without being called a racist. People are thinking with very closed minds and it's a trend that you see constantly these days. People literally won't allow themselves to think without labelling something ''racist'' or ''offensive to'' etc etc. Absolutely spot on. Five facts about these riots The vast majority of the riots and ALL of the main areas involved are predominantly black FACT There is no aim apart from people looting and taking advantage of the situation by robbing and acting like cunts FACT 80% of the people involved are black FACT They will achieve nothing FACT They will blame lack of opportunities, while being in one of the world's great cities for opportunities, they'll blame lack of education and the government FACT There is no reason they should be doing this FACT ...lastly it is wrong in the constraints of political correctness in 2011 to mention the utter majority of these vile scum are not white FACT Someone answer me this question WHY can't we debate my last point, I'm not on about on here, but WHY can't it even be mentioned someone give me an intelligent reasoned answer as to why questions can not be asked. Love the way you pulled actual figures out of the air and called them facts. 95% of people involved are male. FACT. Why aren't you chomping at the bit to point out that FACT? Well done for avoiding my question. I think it's a point made and debated across the mainstream media. http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/art...n-to-the-mob.do http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-20...ams-alight.html Does it concern you football hooliganism isn't flagged as a white problem? Not at all. I knew you'd be a fanny.

I wasn't trying to say GA was victim of this: "People literally won't allow themselves to think without labelling something ''racist'' or ''offensive to'' etc etc." I just think that given the type of stuff that is tolerated on here, Daffyd and Nick for instance, I'm surprised that racism like GA displayed would result in a ban. Racism is fundamentally stupid and worthy of derision, but it's something that can lead to a more interesting debate than say... Tom, do you think that Alan Shearer was putting his full effort in during the last 3 months of Gullitt's management, that is to say, perhaps he was annoyed because he didn't like Gullitt personally and this reflected in his performances on the pitch? What did GA say like?

we've all seen for ourselves that the white folk have been involved too. Can't blame kay Burley for pulling him up on it. And he's far too little to be called big jim anyway It's the thought process I'm criticising. It's not about race in the orthodox sense but that a man can't report a factual event without being called a racist. People are thinking with very closed minds and it's a trend that you see constantly these days. People literally won't allow themselves to think without labelling something ''racist'' or ''offensive to'' etc etc. Absolutely spot on. Five facts about these riots The vast majority of the riots and ALL of the main areas involved are predominantly black FACT There is no aim apart from people looting and taking advantage of the situation by robbing and acting like cunts FACT 80% of the people involved are black FACT They will achieve nothing FACT They will blame lack of opportunities, while being in one of the world's great cities for opportunities, they'll blame lack of education and the government FACT There is no reason they should be doing this FACT ...lastly it is wrong in the constraints of political correctness in 2011 to mention the utter majority of these vile scum are not white FACT Someone answer me this question WHY can't we debate my last point, I'm not on about on here, but WHY can't it even be mentioned someone give me an intelligent reasoned answer as to why questions can not be asked. Love the way you pulled actual figures out of the air and called them facts. 95% of people involved are male. FACT. Why aren't you chomping at the bit to point out that FACT? Well done for avoiding my question.