Optimistic Nut 9 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 (edited) It's pissing me off how the press seem to be claiming this goal should have counted (which it should have), yet last season against Liverpool when the ball was played to Bowyer (onside with Kluivert offside in the middle not in "Phase 1"), and then pulled back to Kluivert (then onside), there was uproar saying how it shouldn't have counted. Edited December 20, 2005 by Optimistic Nut Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CrimsonFault Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 That's the only appropiate emotion thingy to describe Wenger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 1 Posted December 20, 2005 Share Posted December 20, 2005 It's pissing me off how the press seem to be claiming this goal should have counted (which it should have), yet last season against Liverpool when the ball was played to Bowyer (onside with Kluivert offside in the middle not in "Phase 1"), and then pulled back to Kluivert (then onside), there was uproar saying how it shouldn't have counted. 70035[/snapback] Whilst they are both in keeping with the law the Van Persie goal was an easier decision to make - Henry never touched the ball so there was none of this phase 1/ phase 2 debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now