wolfy

First of all, let me clarify something that people seem to be hanging on to. First of all, I'm not the one mentioning clues forum all the time, it's a few of you who keep bringing that up. I don't get all my thoughts from that forum, yet some of what that forum puts out is food for thought , the same as many others out there give food for thought on certain issues , yet none of them can directly influence my judgement until I've also looked at the official versions of stuff I choose to look at. It's only then that I come to a conclusion by weighing up what looks more logical to believe and I find it definitely sides with those who question official stories given out. A free thinker is a person that can question something against the grain without being influenced by peer pressure. I am influenced by nobody and make my own judgements. What I don't do, is pass of anything as MY OWN, that has been made up by a few of you too for some reason. Anything that's entered my mind, as in the moon landings for instance, is well documented on the internet as is just about every other subject. It's about sifting through all versions of stories about it, just the same as others. You might be good at your job tracking vehicles or whatever you do but like I said before...you are doing your job and are told it's satellite tracking...you don;t know what you are dealing with..you just know it's signals, just like a person using a sat nav in their car believe 100% it's satellite tracking, because after all, it's called a sat nav and everyone is TOLD it's satellites, so why think otherwise. I can simply point to the one and only thing that proves there are no satellites in space, which I've explained before and it's a very simple case of "rockets cannot work in a vacuum" and also, no man made rocket can escape our own atmosphere. Our atmosphere protects us mere mortals on Earth against outside threats and it does it's job brilliantly when you consider we all don't have to run around dodging bus sized chunks of raining space debris, because anything hitting our atmosphere is vaporised. Now considering that, it should be common sense to also understand that any object we sent up into space, would vaporise on any attempt just trying to break free from this planet, never mind coming back into the atmosphere. Do I expect anyone to go along with this? No I don't, as everyone also has a free choice to make their own minds up and should actually use that. Unfortunately, there are too many people that follow the trend of accepting the wider public opinion, even if it could be blatantly wrong.

The fraud.

I'm laughing man, behave, you'll give Gemmill a complex.

What's your point here?

We don't know what the moon is actually made of. We are just told what it is made of by the word of Astronot's and moon rock supposed samples.We don't even know what the atmosphere is made of. Ok...for all those that believe what scientists tell them , then obviously they know what it's made of and everything else. I don;t think anyone has a clue to be honest because we have not even got close to the edge of our own atmosphere and all they rely on is telescope views from Earth.

Here's something to ponder for those who believe the moon landing was real. Go and take a look at any picture you want of the Astronot's supposedly on the moon and look at the sun shining on it which hardly lights the surface right? Now go outside and go and look at the moon and tell me if it's as bright as a light. Now think about why we see it as bright as that on the surface, yet the Astronot's are walking about in darkness basically. Obviously the answer should be easy as it's a 1 from 2 answers or maybe both. 1. it's because it's filmed in the nevada desert or similar at night. 2. It's filmed in a studio.

No. Just the heating on full.

Totally. You should see me here man, I'm sweating.

Eyes down, your first number. Legs eleven.

Where you going like?

I wish you'd stop hurting my internet feelings you blighter.

I'd certainly put my two penneth into any of those discussions with my theories, yet if I start a thread, you can be sure I will be immediately classed as putting it up to wind people up by the usual suspects. If someone wants to put one up, I'd comment on it.

You can say it as many times as you want to but it doesn't make what you say, true.

If that's the case, there would be no point in discussing anything in history. The point is, people are interested in whether the moon landings happened or not even if many aren't. Most topics won't be everyone's cup of tea and they can choose whether they take part in it or go to another topic, correct? Seeing as this is the general discussion part, it's gonna be natural that every person has their own topic in mind, or thoughts on certain things, whether that is tea of coffee, flights, food likes/dislikes...history which includes WW1/WW2, Iraq, Vietnam or whatever and also theories as to why terrorist acts are/were performed...right up to media spin and questions raised about world events. If the topic put up, receives little or no interest, it disappears from sight. If it does, then it's clearly something that people want to read or discuss.

You just can't help yourself in the name calling stakes can you. You've achieved nothing but frustration doing it for a good while now, so why you persist is beyond me. Anyway: I believe there were no planes because "there were no planes"...why? Because of a number of very very good reasons. 1. The shit footage of that day, sold to us by the media. 2. Aluminium planes do not FULLY melt into STEEL building and through STEEL floors. You critically appraise evidence for a living...well you get an F for effort here. I don't know why you keep harping on about the holocaust because I have never mentioned it.

No time to give me anything in depth, yet all the time in the world to post on the forum. Oh ok. Anyway: I question 9/11 as do millions of others. I question it in more depth and bring out flaws in official stories as many do. I question the existence of a bomb that supposedly smacks pieces of dense, yet tough metal together that somehow destroys cities, which includes Hiroshima. I don't deny Hiroshima was bombed....just not nuclear or atom bombed that's all. You question nothing and I question many things. Who has the best chance of being cast off as gullible? You keep mentioning about me posting on here and why you think I shouldn't. What is it exactly that is worrying you about me? You have the option of bypassing my posts as if I'm not there, yet you choose to want to expose me for some reason...I don't get this.

When Steve let slip what? What are you actually exposing me of? I don't deserve a platform here? Ok Renton, I'm actually lost. Is Steve your father or next door neighbour or something, or is he someone you look up to on here , you know like a little kid looks up to his bigger brother for acceptance? I'll look forward to your in depth explanation of this if you don't mind.

In answer to both those questions, basically, it's none of your business. I could tell you anything at all what I do and it would be dismissed in a heart beat, so on that note...ask no questions and you'll get no lies. Now here's a serious question for you. Try and answer it without using "boredom" or "amusement" or similar words in your answer. Firstly: I'm stupid and a loony and every other name concerned with that right? You are obviously super intelligent and know everything, which is always true , if you say it is. Question: Why are you even responding to an idiot such as myself?

I persist here because I'm Newcastle United fan, who also has many theories about many things, like many people do.I'm here because I signed up, just as you are here for that very same reason.

No credibility here? You mean on a football message board where I know no one personally. Is this what you mean. Hahahahaha. I put a lot of effort in what I type because it's my thoughts. All you do is expend all your energy name calling like a daft kid. For you to say I have no credibility , you must have done a poll or privately messaged every other member on here to come to the silly conclusion about this no credibility. Or, you have decided that you are one of the most important members on here that you feel you are entitled to say that as you know you will be backed up by the usual little pitchfork internet mob. I'll stick to being me, which means, I don't lick arse or require people to like me who I have never met in my life and you can stick to crying and whining and wanting people to think you're a super intelligent pillar of society. Hehehe.

I can't be arsed to play childish tit for tat for long, it gets boring.

Trot along. Hahahaha.

Keep thinking, it keeps your brain sharp, even if you are wrong.

This is all you are capable of doing.

Check any of my posts, I don;t recall EVER mentioning sheeple.I have mentioned , once or twice, sheep.