wolfy

It doesn't matter what other scientists in their field think of what I say or what I do. Whatever any scientist thinks of me will not change my stance on what I believe, unless they can actually prove what I'm saying is 100% wrong. Rikko has explained some good things and how certain things work. I still have problems with the concept though, so it doesn't pacify me on my belief that nuclear power is not what we are told it is.

Ant. What you think I am and what you think of me is totally irrelevant to me. I'm questioning stuff because I have trouble believing media shite. Sometimes I wish I just questioned nothing but I'm an inquisitive bastard.

You stick with that.

You asked me what my job was , as you wanted to know. I told you I was a scientist. You don;t accept this, so just choose a job for me or just think of me being a tin foil hat benefits sponger, I'm easy whichever you choose.

Yes, to me it looks faked footage. I say this because all footage of the explosions on any news channel are all distorted, it's either all news channels having shit video recorders or it's fake footage. The chimney does disappear.

Yeah we'll go with that then. Anything's ok, just pick something.

You asked a question, I gave you an answer. What you decide to believe is entirely up to you Ant, I'm fine with what you think I am or what I do.

Nope, I don't reckon it's proof of fakery, I merely mentioned that the footage is absolute shite.

I'm a scientist.

So what you know about fissioning is based on just theory and if you are honest, you don't know 100% what actually goes on in a reactor do you.I mean you know the theory of what goes on and you know that the people you are around are telling you what goes on, yet you haven't actually seen for yourself the nuclear reaction process with your own eyes, am I correct here? Now , I grant you that in your mind, your theory is far far stronger than my supposition but that doesn't make nuclear power true, except in theory. You know as well as I do that there's thousands of people working in or around nuclear power stations, subs, aircraft carriers and the likes and all will be told (at least basically) what the process is yet they will never see that process in it's real form, they will just see the ship moving and lit up and believe it's nuclear power. I could be a million miles away from knowing what really makes them work or they actually do work in how they say, yet I just don't see how it's possible. Fair do's, it's easy to say my lack of understanding of it is why I don't know about it but those that rely on the theory of it working could be being duped.....it's possible isn't it Rikko, no matter how small a possibility it will appear to you...it is possible that it's all based on a lie isn't it?

When I was a kid we would fuck about in straw field and now and again someone would hoy a match in and it would blaze away. Naturally we would run like fuck. These days, they play in fields and such and fuck about with smoke detector bits and various chemicals. Mix then altogether and fission it, then run like fuck when it goes into melt down.

Have you physically done any sort of experiment that showed you a glowing fissioning piece of Uranium or the likes, or have you went through uni based on equations and theory?

After seeing this video, I have to apologise to all for doubting nuclear energy.It's explained it all to me in a more simplified manner thanks to glow boy. I'm off to ASDA tomorrow to get all the ingredients. I'm gonna knock a small nuke reactor up, then have my electric cut off and connect it via my own little reactor. The eleccy company will be pissed at me but I don't care. To think I've questioned this for a while. I feel a right doyle now. Does anyone know if I have to have a boy scout uniform or can I just go ahead and just knock one up. I can just see all my neighbours jealous as fuck in a weeks time when they see my house lit up like a fucking ready brek halo, I wonder what they will call me ( and no Gemmill, they won't call me stupid cunt)...I will be walking past and they will all shout, ' uh ho, there goes the fission man' .....or they will shout, ' here is is, it's reactor man' , I'll feel dead good. You'd think by now they'd have ready made reactors by chad valley or something wouldn't you. Juts nip in the shops and say, ' ermm, can I have a 60 watt light bulb, a bag of fuses, some clothes pegs, black bin liners, a box of daz....oh and can I have one of them nuclear reactors please'...fucking mint. 'oh , this is one of the books I used to get my knowledge, (flicks through the pages) , oh look , it's a sheet inside where I done my equations aged fucking eleven.' In the garage with his mask on whilst the female is saying, are you supposed to be doing this, as he's ripping a smoke detector to nits to release the atoms, which unbeknown to him were jumping off his knee and running like fuck from his garage, looking back at him and shouting, ' fuck you glow boy.' I bet the woman was standing there in a full nuclear warfare suit eh.

Thanks. You expend far too much time trying to have a dig man, why don;t you hoy a bit into the topic. You can see you are doomed to failure trying to take me on in the put down stakes and you will, in time literally cry like a gissy and threaten to leave or something. Just join in man, I don't have any grudge against you.

Well if he does, at least he won;t sit there and piss himself like you keep doing.

I'll tell you what Rikko. Can you tell me how they managed to fission an atom in a lab with the neutrons and have you done this at university or at a special nuclear facility. I'm not talking about reactors here, I'm talking about the process of just fissioning as it must have been tested on a tiny scale to know what it does, right? Any nuclear scientist should be doing this experiment.

So a neutron is smaller than an invisible atom is it? Any idea how they managed to measure this?

I love science me. What I don;t like, is made up science to fit a agenda for extortionate financial gain and scaremongering.

Rikko: I don't want to know the mathematics behind nuclear power, or space because I seriously think it's a load of shit with mathematics to back up that shit. After all, a lie can't be made to stick , unless it can be backed up under intense scrutiny can it. If everything is as true and plain above board then why do the media keep showing us all, absolute total crap pictures and video of events. Why can't we see clear images of these events? Just remember Rikko. As I said before. Nuclear power is reliant on an invisible thing called an ATOM. Which university in this country caters for students studying nuclear physics?

Well it's nice of you to say I'm doing it convincingly Gemmill.I had a feeling that you admired me. I said to my wife...here Eunice, come here a minute and have a look at what this lad Gemmill says about me. You know what she said?...She said, ' you know what Wolfy..that lad admires you so much I'm beginning to think he's falling for you.' I went dead red and said' behave, you bloody cheeky bugger.'

But there was no exclusion zone.

Nope. I'm saying that the before and after pictures I showed do not look real. I don;t know what extent the damage was as I've never been there to see it.I just happen to see TV footage that is so low quality it beggars belief, with the Fukushima blasts.

Well they better have a shit load of them because there's millions out there that are questioning events.

I didn't know there was an exclusion zone before any blast occurred did you?

Can anyone find any clear footage at all of the blasts at the Fukushima plant? Every one I pull up, is shite footage. The news footage is obviously faked.