wolfy

Maybe they are interested in discussing stuff, whilst you are sat there getting frustrated throwing your toys at the wall and over using such hurtful words as cunt and stupid. Hahahaha. Ok I'm sorry for calling you head on legs and long lad and such. I didn't know it was hurting your feeling. Why don't you maybe join in and put some of your thoughts into it.

I'll try and explain it to you as simple as I can. If you were stood getting a warm from a radiator and a scientist walked over and said, ' now then Renton lad, do you know that radiator is being heated by by a small nuclear reactor that's been fitted'.. ( even if he knew it was being heated by other means) you can accept it, as you would and when someone asks you how your place is heated up, you will tell them it's by a small nuclear reactor and you being you, appear to be an expert, when in fact you are only going on what you were told.

Now you see, I have a massive problem with it all now.Something like that, which is operating under intense pressure, using no oxygen at all as we are told nuclear fissioning does not require oxygen, I can't see how the water can be turned into steam without some sort of venting, somehow. For instance: If I fill my car radiator....ooops, sorry....If I fill the bus radiator that I travel on and close the radiator cap, my bus can take me wherever I want because the water in that radiator will not boil or create steam because it's under pressure with no oxygen to turn that into gas/vapour/steam right? Now If I wanted to attach a little turbine to the lid of the radiator and drive along, that turbine would start spinning as soon as the water starts over heating, bubbling up and creating steam, yet it wouldn't be long before my car....I mean Bus would go bang due to all my water being boiled away.

I'm not claiming Rikko is part of any conspiracy. Rikko could be working on stuff that he fully believes is run by super hard metal pellets that somehow just glow like fuck when faced with each other. What goes on inside those reactors is shrouded in secrecy, so Rikko and most others working in that industry could be easily fooled. The operative word is COULD.

It still has to be condensed right? To condense it, I assume the submarine would have to continually allow sea water in for this process to happen right? And going by that, it would also have to be pumping the hot sea water out and so on and so on, correct? All this can be done whilst keeping the original water sealed, sort of like a combi boiler radiator system in your house, under pressure constantly, unless there is a leak of course.

Well done on your sports car. Anyway. By your reckoning then, steam engines should not emit steam at all. Also nuclear power stations should not need massive stacks to vent steam, which they clearly do. Why is this if it can all be condensed back as efficiently as supposedly a sub does?

Here's something to read. It might interest some people as to the mindset. This is a copy and paste, so it's not my words. What is the scarcest commodity on planet Earth right now? Oil? Gas? Clean water? Unpolluted air? If you nodded “yes” to any of the above, you’re not even close. The scarcest commodity on this planet right now is the ability to think in a rational, critical, logical, and independent manner. If you want to be among the world’s great mass of unthinkers whose ignorance and gullibility allows the incompetent, the unscrupulous, and the corrupt to run amok, then be sure to live by the following five tips! 1. Fail to verify information for yourself Perhaps the most important characteristic of the Easily-Brainwashed Sucker is a blind reliance on second-hand information. This is information derived from external sources, such as newspapers, magazines, Internet sites, popular books, television, family members, neighbors, work mates, and so on. You would think that, when contemplating information whose accuracy could have a profound impact on one’s continued well-being–for example, the decision to change one’s diet, take a prescription medicine, make a large financial commitment, or support a nation’s entry into war–one would make an exerted effort to verify the reliability of that information as best as possible. Most people, however, put more effort into combing their hair than they do analyzing the validity of potentially life-altering information. It is nothing short of startling how many of us will make major life decisions based on information that is little more than hearsay. Unwilling or unaware of how to check out the facts for ourselves, many of us assume that because: something is in print; reported in the media; widely believed by others, or; has been disseminated to us by some apparently respectable source, it must be true. The situation is worsened when such folks are presented with a multitude of differing opinions or viewpoints. “There’s so much conflicting information out there,” they complain, “you don’t know who to believe”. Many folks simply bury any rising sense of confusion by going along with majority opinion or the opinion of whoever appears to be the most highly decorated or popular commentator. Others will simply believe the version of events that ‘seems’, ‘feels’ or ‘sounds’ right to them. If someone says that studies have proven “beyond all doubt” that eating saturated fats is harmful, do you ask to see those studies before vowing to surgically trim all the fat from any piece of meat that ever passes your lips? Or do you simply believe them? When vegetarian activists claim that avoiding meat will make you live longer, do you ask whether any studies exist that actually show this to be true? Or do you believe their emotionally based anti-meat scare mongering and proceed to delete the most nutrient dense food ever known from your diet? When the leader of your country announces that he is about to support war on a country that is allegedly harboring weapons of mass destruction, but cannot provide anything that even remotely resembles evidence, do you smell a rat? Or do you join the frenzied masses and demand that we send our young men and women off to kill and be killed, to fight in a war that will inevitably result in the annihilation of thousands of innocent civilians? There is a widespread phenomenon that I like to refer to as the “They Syndrome”. This is when people say things like “They say that low-carbohydrate diets are bad for you” or “They reckon ACME shares are a pretty good buy at the moment” or “They said in this morning’s paper that Osama Bin Laden is hiding in Outer Mongolia”. Who the hell is “they”? “They” is typically a vague and often completely unidentifiable and unverifiable source floating somewhere out “there”. For the Easily-Brainwashed Sucker, that’s as good a source as any! 2. Believe that because something is widely held as fact, it must be true Humans typically find great solace in being part of the crowd. As Mark Twain once wrote, “We are discreet sheep; we wait to see how the drove is going, and then go with the drove.” Being part of the crowd provides a sense of comfort and belonging. It can also have an incredibly powerful mind-dulling effect, one that is strongly antithetical to logical and independent thought. As anyone who has ever watched a mob riot or stock market panic can attest, even highly intelligent and respectable individuals quickly come unglued when caught up in the mass-hysteria of crowds. In chaotic events like these, being part of the crowd can rouse people into acting in the most irrational and self-destructive manner. During less stormy times, being part of the crowd lulls people into believing that if everybody believes something, it must be true. After all, why would so many people believe something if it wasn’t? Never mind that, not too far back in history, the overwhelming majority of people believed that the world was flat; never mind that that the increasingly concentrated ownership of mass media outlets makes the spreading of misinformation easier than ever before. Nope, never you mind these things at all; if you want to be an Easily-Brainwashed Sucker, you need to think like the rest of the crowd. In fact, if you’re a really good member of the flock, you’ll make a point of vigorously ridiculing those obnoxious black sheep who dare to speak their own minds–regardless of whether or not they may actually be speaking the truth! Baaa!

Cutting a hole in the pressure hull? Rikko, if you don't mind me asking...what is your expertise in this. What is it that you actual do with reactors?

A lower angle? How low an angle?To me , considering it;s supposed to be 24 miles up, it certainly looks like it's either took from some other fake helium balloon, maybe piloted by a brave camera man or it's just blatantly embarrassingly fake. I'll go with the latter.

Agreed.

Back to these nuclear powered subs. It is said that nuclear power is just a glorified way of boiling water and if real, it would be correct because it just heats up, super hot we are told by miraculous fissioning. Now I'm on the understanding that to make something work, like a steam engine for instance, you cannot make it work unless something is vented one way or the other. We see how a steam train works by pumping the steam to drive pistons and is exhausted through the top as steam. I mean if it could condense the steam and recycle it back fully meaning no exhaust/outlet then you get no movement. So in a nuclear powered sub, the so called nuclear fusion super heats the water up which is sent to another part that turns it into steam that drives the generator and propeller and the used steam somehow condenses super quick and is sent back round to be heated again with no supposed venting necessary, even for the condenser...hmmmm. I'm having real trouble getting to grips with this mind. I'm still having trouble working out how they get spent fuel rods out of a sub to refuel without killing everyone in the vicinity of it, as we are told that spent fuel is highly toxic. The concept sounds great to be honest, when you look at it on face value. I mean, you fuel the sub, get the reaction going and off you go to sea where you can stay for 20 odd years without a refuel (as long as food supplies are dropped off to you) assuming you want to change crews at sea to keep it on going.

If someone can shed any light on post 582 and how they took the supposed infra red shot at that height sideways on I'd be interested to know.

Do you like beef paste?

Why don't you tell me what I got banned for.

You just think what you want to think. I'm happy with what I do and I don;t need to know what you do.

When Felix is falling from 126,000 feet , even though the footage is supposedly infra red ...can anyone tell me what took the footage of this at that height, looking at him sideways on and not from the ground.... I'd be interested if anyone can shed some light on this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYL0tVOpu2Q

Aye, silly me. just 20,000 more feet and it's the pitch black of space eh.

Oh it's not exactly perfect. like if we got our photos took at a party but it's one hell of a clearish shot form that height from ground level don;t you think? Do you think it was from a helicopter, nimble balloon..., maybe a U2 spy plane ? Super focus ground 2012 technology camera/video? http://www.space.com/17959-red-bull-stratos-skydive-photos.html

Ok. Well here's one at 106,594 feet. What camera took this shot?

The ground footage and the zoom in that is perfect. Can you explain that to me .

Ok.Can you tell me how they take out the spent fuel rods, that are obviously (so we are told) killer radioactive..from the submarines when they need to refuel. Can you also tell me how a nuclear sub can stay at sea for 25 years on the same fuel when nuclear reactors on land have to refuel ( supposedly every 6 years or so.

Who really knows. Who actually knows what and who's money is behind what is actually going on...we know that plenty of things are going on, yet the jigsaw is in tens of thousands of pieces and we still have to figure out what pieces of the sky fit because we have done the easy bit with the objects.

I know who fell for stuff and in isn't me but each to their own.

Don't you think the nice perfect footage of him at 120, 000 feet , as clear as day is suspect and I'm not talking about the supposed camera's on board which are pathetic in themselves, I'm on about the supposed GROUND shots of it as the balloon inflated more and more to what looked like breaking point. Why do people buy into this? I honestly hand on heart cannot understand how people think this shit is real.

Well it's gonna have to cut it because guess what. I don't know what was on their minds and why they did certain stuff with names and race, I think a seat in the room where it was planned maybe might clue you up.