Jump to content

Tdansmith

Members
  • Posts

    4260
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Posts posted by Tdansmith

  1. 16 hours ago, Gemmill said:

     

     

    Anyway. My advice. Take it or leave it, but good luck if you decide to stay on there. 

    When I first read  "good luck if you decide to stay on here" I wasn't sure what you meant.  I do now 😂🤣

    I wasn't expecting the pile on but I understand now why my opinion caused that, I didn't think I deserved the insults however, but that's life I guess. 

    Thanks Rayvin for being reasonable. 

    So, I'll take the hint Gemmill and leave this site.  It's a damn shame as I really liked posting and reading here.  Never-mind.

     

    Best of luck and good health to all who post here, even the ones who insulted me 😂 And nee hard feelings.

     

    Hopefully, sooner rather than later we end that trophy drought and bring a cup home, I'm convinced we will.  🤞

     

     

  2. 2 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

     

    Mate, I've really tried but you're not interested in my reasoning. Fair enough, but you've got nothing to say on this in response other than refusing to acknowledge this issue on the level of detail that would be necessary to form any sort of judgement. So I'm done with this now.

    ok fair enough. 

  3. Just now, Rayvin said:

     

    The one on the shorter sentence is being released apparently - from what I can see he didn't actually carry out the violence which is presumably why. He got the manslaughter charge seemingly because he supplied the weapon to the guy who did (the longer sentence).

     

    That's my reading of it anyway. Why the fuck I've spent so much time on this is beyond me, but what is clear is that there are a lot of details to this that Musk and friends are willfully ignoring to be able to whip up hysteria.

    When you find out the details please let me know..   

     Once again my very first question that i asked.

    maybe, just maybe, you've spent so much time on this is because you don't like what you hear ? 

    maybe Musk has a point ? 

  4. 4 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

    If it was that simple, I would say no. But then I don't consider it that simple whatsoever, so again, I feel the question isn't relevant. Two months for inciting a riot that could have led to people being killed and mass violence if strong action wasn't taken (and those people were warned in real time but continued their stupidity anyway) versus a teenager stabbing a guy in the hand during a scuffle between two gangs (where the perpetrator's gang was the one being pursued) and unfortunately nicking a major blood vessel.

     

    Taking all the details out makes it sound bad, but honestly isn't a remotely fair way of interpreting it. It lacks all context.

    Two years in prison...for posting something on the nett. 

    Two years ! 

    Manslaughter...6 month. 

    What planet are you on ?

     

    "context" is something you are looking for, maybe look up "!machete"

  5. 20 minutes ago, RobinRobin said:

    No shit Sherlock. Trump has said he's going to remove the head of the SEC who wants to bring crypto under the same rules as other investments. 

    And Trump just so happens to have a couple of his own crypto offerings out, so no conflict of interest there. 

    At least @Christmas Tree is doing alright. 🙂 

     

    The company 'NESO' who published data to support net zero, which Miliband claimed is 'independent', has only one registered person with 'significant control'.

     

    Any idea who it is ? 

    Go on have a guess ?  Or a google ?

  6. 2 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

     

    The fact that you're posing that question to me after everything I just wrote indicates to me that you're operating ideologically and not with interest in the facts of the matter.

     

    Why is your question relevant? A judge in 2024 sentenced this man with a specific ruling that while it was manslaughter, it was the lowest form of GBH possible because he stabbed him in the hand/wrist with no intent at all to kill. Then Labour release lower violence offenders which, on the judge's original decision, happens to include this guy. On a technicality. Now explain to me why your question, which seems to imply that Labour are actively responsible for both decisions, is relevant?

    Ok, fair comment. You've successfully baffled me with lawyer crap you've looked up.

     

    So, 6 month for manslaughter.

    Two years for posting about it..

    I couldn't give a fuck if it's labour or conservative .

    Do you think that is fair ? yes or no ? 

     

  7. Just now, RobinRobin said:

    No shit Sherlock. Trump has said he's going to remove the head of the SEC who wants to bring crypto under the same rules as other investments. 

    And Trump just so happens to have a couple of his own crypto offerings out, so no conflict of interest there. 

    At least @Christmas Tree is doing alright. 🙂 

     

    No need for the insult RR.

     

  8. 8 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

    And this level of effort is beyond right wing media, Elon bellend Musk, and associated right wing asshats.

    So, six month for manslaughter and two years for posting about it on a website. 

    that's ok by you ? 

  9. 10 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

     

     

    You are aware that the people posting bad words on the internet were supporting having scores of people burned alive in a building right?

    No one was burned alive, nobody, not scores of people, no body.

     

    The people that attempted that should go to prison, for attempted manslaughter,  idiots on the internet who posted bad words should not go to prison for two years ! 

    TWO YEARS ! when someone could be out after 6 month for actual manslaughter !    

     

  10. Just now, Rayvin said:

     

    You should take it up with the Tories but I would wager that the case was more complex than the any of the halfwits reacting to it have made clear.

    That is just your opinion is it not ? I actually can't take it up with the Tories..

    I just see what was posted, I honestly don't know what is true or not these days, however if someone can get 6 month in jail for manslaughter and someone else can get two years for posting some bad words on the internet that is just wrong IMO. 

     

  11. 4 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

    If by true you mean the prisons were neglected by the Tories to the point of extreme overcrowding, and this one lad who was jailed for manslaughter is getting out early as a result, (but the other guy who got 9 years is still in prison and doing the time) then yes.

    So, 6 month for manslaughter is ok ?  

  12. 1 hour ago, Dr Gloom said:

    I hope Tyson schools him, which of course he will if he doesn't throw it. Even at that age I doubt the YouTuber could lay a glove on him, but i suspect the Jake Paul gravy train will continue and Toy Bellew will be next line. Surely at some point pride will kick in and a former pro will put an end to this circus. Let the YouTubers "boxers' fight each other and stop bringing the sport into disrepute with this nonsense. 

    Jake Paul shouting, screaming "im  going to fucking kill him" and  "he's fucking going to fucking die" and lots more swearing in an interview after the slap.

     I can see how proper boxing fans are cringing at this.

     I hope after seeing that swearing rant that Tyson knocks the dickhead clean out.

  13. Jake Paul v Mike Tyson 

    Sat 4am

    60,000 people going to be there apparently.

      Tyson is 58 FFS ! 

     Real boxing fans will no doubt hate it.  

     Betting odds are interesting as well. 1/2 Jake Paul to win must be a good bet ? 

     Any thoughts? Or do most here not care ? 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.